Re: [LKP] Re: [pipe] f2af7d90e2: xfstests.btrfs.052.fail

2020-05-11 Thread Jens Axboe 
On 5/10/20 10:06 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Hi Matthew
> 
> with a quick look into the dmesg
> looks this commit broke the preparation of LKP tests
> 
> [   32.677588] install debs round two: dpkg -i --force-confdef 
> --force-depends /opt/deb/gawk_1%3a4.1.4+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
> [ 32.677593]-
> [   32.697180] tar: ./control: Cannot write: Invalid argument
> [ 32.697184]-
> [   32.705025] tar: ./md5sums: Cannot write: Invalid argument
> [ 32.705030]-
> [   32.710034] tar: ./postinst: Cannot write: Invalid argument
> [ 32.710039]-
> [   32.743721] tar: ./prerm: Cannot write: Invalid argument

The patch does look broken, as per discussions with Al on the equiv
eventfd change, it's not complete. It's also not queued up anywhere,
just posted for review, and subsequently dropped (for now).

So feel free to ignore it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [LKP] Re: [pipe] f2af7d90e2: xfstests.btrfs.052.fail

2020-05-10 Thread Li Zhijian 

Hi Matthew

with a quick look into the dmesg
looks this commit broke the preparation of LKP tests

[   32.677588] install debs round two: dpkg -i --force-confdef 
--force-depends /opt/deb/gawk_1%3a4.1.4+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

[ 32.677593]-
[   32.697180] tar: ./control: Cannot write: Invalid argument
[ 32.697184]-
[   32.705025] tar: ./md5sums: Cannot write: Invalid argument
[ 32.705030]-
[   32.710034] tar: ./postinst: Cannot write: Invalid argument
[ 32.710039]-
[   32.743721] tar: ./prerm: Cannot write: Invalid argument

i tried apt command, it also failed with this commit
root@vm-snb-186 ~# apt update
Ign:1 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian stretch InRelease
Get:2 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian testing InRelease 
[116 kB]

Ign:2 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian testing InRelease
Get:3 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian unstable 
InRelease [146 kB]

Ign:3 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian unstable InRelease
Get:4 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian stretch Release 
[118 kB]

Err:4 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian stretch Release
  Error writing to output file - write (22: Invalid argument)
Get:5 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian testing Release 
[115 kB]

Err:5 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian testing Release
  Error writing to output file - write (22: Invalid argument)
Get:6 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian unstable Release 
[145 kB]
Get:7 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian unstable 
Release.gpg [1601 B]

Err:7 http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian unstable Release.gpg
  Error writing to output file - write (22: Invalid argument)
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian 
stretch Release' does not have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is 
therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user 
configuration details.
E: The repository 'http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian 
testing Release' does not have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is 
therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user 
configuration details.
E: The repository 'http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian 
unstable Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is 
therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user 
configuration details.


everything works well without f2af7d90e2 in our environment


Thanks


On 5/11/20 9:16 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:09:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:

 --- tests/btrfs/095.out2020-04-09 10:45:28.0 +0800
 +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/095.out.bad2020-05-06 
21:13:51.276485703 +0800
 @@ -1,35 +1,9 @@
  QA output created by 095
 -Blocks modified: [135 - 164]
 -Blocks modified: [768 - 792]
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined

This looks like a problem with the test setup.
___
LKP mailing list -- l...@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-le...@lists.01.org

Re: [pipe] f2af7d90e2: xfstests.btrfs.052.fail

2020-05-10 Thread Rong Chen 




On 5/11/20 9:16 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:09:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:

 --- tests/btrfs/095.out2020-04-09 10:45:28.0 +0800
 +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/095.out.bad2020-05-06 
21:13:51.276485703 +0800
 @@ -1,35 +1,9 @@
  QA output created by 095
 -Blocks modified: [135 - 164]
 -Blocks modified: [768 - 792]
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
 +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined

This looks like a problem with the test setup.



Hi Matthew,

Thanks for the response, we'll double check it.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

Re: [pipe] f2af7d90e2: xfstests.btrfs.052.fail

2020-05-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox 
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:09:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> --- tests/btrfs/095.out   2020-04-09 10:45:28.0 +0800
> +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/095.out.bad   2020-05-06 
> 21:13:51.276485703 +0800
> @@ -1,35 +1,9 @@
>  QA output created by 095
> -Blocks modified: [135 - 164]
> -Blocks modified: [768 - 792]
> +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
> +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
> +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined
> +awk: line 19: function strtonum never defined

This looks like a problem with the test setup.