Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:58:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:41:42PM +0200, S.??a??lar Onur wrote: > > Hi; > > > > 07 ??ub 2008 Per tarihinde, Greg KH ??unlar?? yazmt??: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > > > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > > > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > If its possible could you please add [1] "mac80211: hardware scan rework" > > and [2] "mac80211: Restore rx.fc before every invocation of > > ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers" into -stable too? > > > > [1] > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ece8edddf067d21c4e5abfe3f1205da1588edbb2 > > [2] > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=69f817b654d683265118188bbfb8bc0d8978cce6 > > I can queue them up for the next one after this release. In looking at these, I would rather that either the wireless maintainer, or the network maintainer send these too us, to verify that they are needed, and the backport works properly. So please go ask them to send these in. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:58:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:41:42PM +0200, S.??a??lar Onur wrote: Hi; 07 ??ub 2008 Per tarihinde, Greg KH ??unlar?? yazmt??: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. If its possible could you please add [1] mac80211: hardware scan rework and [2] mac80211: Restore rx.fc before every invocation of ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers into -stable too? [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ece8edddf067d21c4e5abfe3f1205da1588edbb2 [2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=69f817b654d683265118188bbfb8bc0d8978cce6 I can queue them up for the next one after this release. In looking at these, I would rather that either the wireless maintainer, or the network maintainer send these too us, to verify that they are needed, and the backport works properly. So please go ask them to send these in. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:45:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. Rolled up patch can be found at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.24.1-rc1.gz thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:24:57PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > Greg, > > > > > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > > > couple of days ago is not included in this series? > > > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html > > > > > > We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that > > > the patch in the link above fixes the problem. > > > > I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? > > Not yet - it's in the pipeline. I'll see if that can be sped > up (someone else usually takes care of the pushes to Linus). Then we did our job right and didn't take it :) Please resend it after it gets into Linus's tree, not before, I'm really tired of checking for these things constantly... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 02/07/2008 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. > > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc: > > line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to > > add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list, > > also email us. > > > > Responses should be made by Friday, Feb 8 2008, 21:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > thanks, > > > > the -stable release team > > Is there an -rc1 patch somewhere on kernel.org? (and also for 2.6.23?) Ugh, no, I didn't create one, sorry. I'll get to that after dinner... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > Greg, > > > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > > couple of days ago is not included in this series? > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html > > > > We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that > > the patch in the link above fixes the problem. > > I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? Not yet - it's in the pipeline. I'll see if that can be sped up (someone else usually takes care of the pushes to Linus). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > Greg, > > Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a > couple of days ago is not included in this series? > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html > > We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that > the patch in the link above fixes the problem. I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not included in this series? http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that the patch in the link above fixes the problem. I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not included in this series? http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that the patch in the link above fixes the problem. I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? Not yet - it's in the pipeline. I'll see if that can be sped up (someone else usually takes care of the pushes to Linus). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 02/07/2008 03:45 PM, Greg KH wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list, also email us. Responses should be made by Friday, Feb 8 2008, 21:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anything received after that time might be too late. thanks, the -stable release team Is there an -rc1 patch somewhere on kernel.org? (and also for 2.6.23?) Ugh, no, I didn't create one, sorry. I'll get to that after dinner... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:24:57PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:44:30AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: Greg, Is there any reason why the XFS patch I sent to the stable list a couple of days ago is not included in this series? http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html We've had multiple reports of it, and multiple confirmations that the patch in the link above fixes the problem. I didn't think it was in Linus's tree yet. Is it? Not yet - it's in the pipeline. I'll see if that can be sped up (someone else usually takes care of the pushes to Linus). Then we did our job right and didn't take it :) Please resend it after it gets into Linus's tree, not before, I'm really tired of checking for these things constantly... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 00/45] 2.6.24-stable review
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:45:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.24.1 release. There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. Rolled up patch can be found at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.24.1-rc1.gz thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
