回复：回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet
>Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you >like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius >' ? Hello. Please use 'Ubisectech Sirius' to credit the report. Thanks.
Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet
Kalle Valo writes:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>
>> "Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>>
Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce
this issue with that applied?
>>> Hello.
>>> I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied
>>> Ubisectech Sirius Team
>>
>> Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
>> like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
>> ' ?
>
> Ubisectech, please CC linux-wireless on any wireless issues and don't
> use HTML format in emails. More info in the wiki below.
Doh, didn't even notice that linux-wireless was not in Cc. Sorry about
that! :(
-Toke
Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> "Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>
>>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>> ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
>>>Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce
>>>this issue with that applied?
>> Hello.
>> I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied
>> Ubisectech Sirius Team
>
> Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
> like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
> ' ?
Ubisectech, please CC linux-wireless on any wireless issues and don't
use HTML format in emails. More info in the wiki below.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet
"Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
>>Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce
>>this issue with that applied?
> Hello.
> I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied
> Ubisectech Sirius Team
Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
' ?
-Toke
