答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-08 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi baolu,
The attachment is the new patch.
If you have any questions, you can contact me at any time.
Thanks.

Best regards
Felix cui-oc




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月7日 16:08
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI 
device in RMRR

Hi,

On 2020/8/7 11:29, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi baolu,
>   I understand what you mean is that you want to put the 
> following processing code in the acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() into 
> the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() ,right?
>   If you mean it , I think it's OK.

Yes. If the acpi device has companion physical devices, then probe the 
companion devices; otherwise, probe the acpi device instead. Also, let's put 
detecting and probing acpi devices in different patches so that they could be 
easier for reviewing.

Best regards,
baolu

> 
>   if (pn_dev == NULL) {
>   acpi_device->bus->iommu_ops = _iommu_ops;
>   ret = iommu_probe_device(acpi_device);
>   if (ret) {
>   pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
>   return ret;
>   }
>   return 0;
>   }
> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui-oc
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月7日 9:08
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for 
> ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> Hi Felix,
> 
> On 2020/8/6 14:51, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi  baolu,
>>  >Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You 
>> have an acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device 
>> scope of a RMRR.
>>  >Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
>> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.
>>
>>  >At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work 
>> for this device, hence you want to add a home-made
>>  >acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.
>>
>>  Your understanding is right.
>>  But there is a problem that even if the namespace device in 
>> rmrr is enumerated in the code, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() also doesn't 
>> work for this device.
>>  This is because the dev parameter of the 
>> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is not the namespace device in RMRR.
>>  The actual parameter passed in is the namespace device's 
>> physical node device.
>>  In iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), the physical node 
>> device passed in cannot match the namespace device in rmrr->device[],right?
>>  We need acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper ?
>>
>>  In addition, adev->physical_node_list is related to the __HID 
>> of namespace device reported by the bios.
>>  For example, if the __HID reported by the bios belongs to 
>> acpi_pnp_device_ids[], adev->physical_node_list has no devices.
>>  So in acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(), I added the case 
>> that adev->physical_node_list is empty.
> 
> Got you. Thanks!
> 
> Have you ever tried to have probe_acpi_namespace_devices() handle the case of 
> empty adev->physical_node_list at the same time?
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Felix cui
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月6日 10:36
>> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
>> ; CobeChen-oc 
>> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI 
>> device in RMRR
>>
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>>> Hi baolu,
>>> Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
>>> needed and please tell me if there is an error.
>>
>> Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an acpi 
>> namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope of a 
>> RMRR. C

Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-07 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi,

On 2020/8/7 11:29, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
I understand what you mean is that you want to put the 
following processing code in the acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() into the 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices() ,right?
If you mean it , I think it's OK.


Yes. If the acpi device has companion physical devices, then probe the
companion devices; otherwise, probe the acpi device instead. Also, let's
put detecting and probing acpi devices in different patches so that they
could be easier for reviewing.

Best regards,
baolu



if (pn_dev == NULL) {
acpi_device->bus->iommu_ops = _iommu_ops;
ret = iommu_probe_device(acpi_device);
if (ret) {
pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}

Best regards
Felix cui-oc





-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月7日 9:08
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device 
in RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/6 14:51, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu,
>Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You 
have an acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope 
of a RMRR.
>Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

>At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work 
for this device, hence you want to add a home-made
>acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Your understanding is right.
But there is a problem that even if the namespace device in 
rmrr is enumerated in the code, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() also doesn't 
work for this device.
This is because the dev parameter of the 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is not the namespace device in RMRR.
The actual parameter passed in is the namespace device's 
physical node device.
In iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), the physical node device 
passed in cannot match the namespace device in rmrr->device[],right?
We need acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper ?

In addition, adev->physical_node_list is related to the __HID 
of namespace device reported by the bios.
For example, if the __HID reported by the bios belongs to 
acpi_pnp_device_ids[], adev->physical_node_list has no devices.
So in acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(), I added the case that 
adev->physical_node_list is empty.


Got you. Thanks!

Have you ever tried to have probe_acpi_namespace_devices() handle the case of 
empty adev->physical_node_list at the same time?

Best regards,
baolu




Best regards
Felix cui


   


-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月6日 10:36
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc
; CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI
device in RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
needed and please tell me if there is an error.


Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an acpi 
namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope of a RMRR. 
Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work for this
device, hence you want to add a home-made
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Did I get it right?


In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device in 
the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
device in RMRR. These are two different devices.


The namespace device has been probed and put in one drhd's device list.
Hence, it should be processed by probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). So the question 
is why there are no devices in addev->physical_node_list?


Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.


Best regards,
baolu



答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-06 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi baolu,
I understand what you mean is that you want to put the 
following processing code in the acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() into the 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices() ,right?
If you mean it , I think it's OK. 

if (pn_dev == NULL) {
acpi_device->bus->iommu_ops = _iommu_ops;
ret = iommu_probe_device(acpi_device);
if (ret) {
pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}

Best regards
Felix cui-oc





-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月7日 9:08
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device 
in RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/6 14:51, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi  baolu,
>   >Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You 
> have an acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device 
> scope of a RMRR.
>   >Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.
> 
>   >At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work 
> for this device, hence you want to add a home-made
>   >acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.
> 
>   Your understanding is right.
>   But there is a problem that even if the namespace device in 
> rmrr is enumerated in the code, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() also doesn't 
> work for this device.
>   This is because the dev parameter of the 
> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is not the namespace device in RMRR.
>   The actual parameter passed in is the namespace device's 
> physical node device.
>   In iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), the physical node 
> device passed in cannot match the namespace device in rmrr->device[],right?
>   We need acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper ?
> 
>   In addition, adev->physical_node_list is related to the __HID 
> of namespace device reported by the bios.
>   For example, if the __HID reported by the bios belongs to 
> acpi_pnp_device_ids[], adev->physical_node_list has no devices.
>   So in acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(), I added the case 
> that adev->physical_node_list is empty.

Got you. Thanks!

Have you ever tried to have probe_acpi_namespace_devices() handle the case of 
empty adev->physical_node_list at the same time?

Best regards,
baolu

> 
> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui
> 
> 
>   
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月6日 10:36
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI 
> device in RMRR
> 
> Hi Felix,
> 
> On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi baolu,
>>  Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
>> needed and please tell me if there is an error.
> 
> Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an acpi 
> namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope of a 
> RMRR. Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.
> 
> At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work for this 
> device, hence you want to add a home-made
> acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.
> 
> Did I get it right?
> 
>>  In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device 
>> in the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
>>  but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
>> device in RMRR. These are two different devices.
> 
> The namespace device has been probed and put in one drhd's device list.
> Hence, it should be processed by probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). So the 
> question is why there are no devices in addev->physical_node_list?
> 
>>  Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
>> probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
>>  acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
>> mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 


Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-06 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/6 14:51, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu,
>Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You 
have an acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope 
of a RMRR.
>Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

>At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work 
for this device, hence you want to add a home-made
>acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Your understanding is right.
But there is a problem that even if the namespace device in 
rmrr is enumerated in the code, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() also doesn't 
work for this device.
This is because the dev parameter of the 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is not the namespace device in RMRR.
The actual parameter passed in is the namespace device's 
physical node device.
In iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), the physical node device 
passed in cannot match the namespace device in rmrr->device[],right?
We need acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper ?

In addition, adev->physical_node_list is related to the __HID 
of namespace device reported by the bios.
For example, if the __HID reported by the bios belongs to 
acpi_pnp_device_ids[], adev->physical_node_list has no devices.
So in acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(), I added the case that 
adev->physical_node_list is empty.


Got you. Thanks!

Have you ever tried to have probe_acpi_namespace_devices() handle the
case of empty adev->physical_node_list at the same time?

Best regards,
baolu




Best regards
Felix cui


  


-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月6日 10:36
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in 
RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
needed and please tell me if there is an error.


Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an acpi 
namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope of a RMRR. 
Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work for this device, 
hence you want to add a home-made
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Did I get it right?


In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device in 
the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
device in RMRR. These are two different devices.


The namespace device has been probed and put in one drhd's device list.
Hence, it should be processed by probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). So the question 
is why there are no devices in addev->physical_node_list?


Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.


Best regards,
baolu



答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-06 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi  baolu,
>Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You 
have an acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device 
scope of a RMRR. 
>Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

>At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work 
for this device, hence you want to add a home-made
>acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Your understanding is right. 
But there is a problem that even if the namespace device in 
rmrr is enumerated in the code, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() also doesn't 
work for this device.
This is because the dev parameter of the 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is not the namespace device in RMRR.
The actual parameter passed in is the namespace device's 
physical node device.
In iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), the physical node 
device passed in cannot match the namespace device in rmrr->device[],right?
We need acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper ? 

In addition, adev->physical_node_list is related to the __HID 
of namespace device reported by the bios.
For example, if the __HID reported by the bios belongs to 
acpi_pnp_device_ids[], adev->physical_node_list has no devices.
So in acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(), I added the case 
that adev->physical_node_list is empty.


Best regards
Felix cui


 

-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月6日 10:36
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in 
RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi baolu,
>   Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
> needed and please tell me if there is an error.

Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an acpi 
namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device scope of a RMRR. 
Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the RMRR, hence 
iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this device.

At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work for this device, 
hence you want to add a home-made
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Did I get it right?

>   In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device 
> in the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
>   but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
> device in RMRR. These are two different devices.

The namespace device has been probed and put in one drhd's device list.
Hence, it should be processed by probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). So the 
question is why there are no devices in addev->physical_node_list?

>   Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
> probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
>   acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
> mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.

Best regards,
baolu


Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-05 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi Felix,

On 8/5/20 3:37 PM, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
needed and please tell me if there is an error.


Sure. Before that, let me sync my understanding with you. You have an
acpi namespace device in ANDD table, it also shows up in the device
scope of a RMRR. Current code doesn't enumerate that device for the
RMRR, hence iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() doesn't work for this
device.

At the same time, probe_acpi_namespace_devices() doesn't work for this
device, hence you want to add a home-made
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() helper.

Did I get it right?


In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device in 
the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
device in RMRR. These are two different devices.


The namespace device has been probed and put in one drhd's device list.
Hence, it should be processed by probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). So the
question is why there are no devices in addev->physical_node_list?


Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.


Best regards,
baolu


答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-05 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi baolu,
Let me talk about why acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is 
needed and please tell me if there is an error.

In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices() function, only the device 
in the addev->physical_node_list is probed,
but we need to establish identity mapping for the namespace 
device in RMRR. These are two different devices.
Therefore, the namespace device in RMRR is not mapped in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices(). 
acpi_device_create_direct_mappings() is to create direct 
mappings for namespace devices in RMRR.

Best regards
Felix cui-oc




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月5日 10:57
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/4/20 11:11 AM, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi  baolu ,
>   When creating a identity mapping for a namespace device in 
> RMRR, you need to add the namespace device to the rmrr->device[] , right?

Yes. You are right.

>   The dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev() in patch adds the enumeration of 
> the 
> namespace device in RMRR. This is similar to > enumerating pci 
> devices. Do you think this is unreasonable? If it is
unreasonable, please tell me why it is unreasonable.

It looks reasonable. Thanks for the explanation.

But I don't think we need to add acpi_device_create_direct_mappings()
since the rmrr identity mapping is already done in the iommu core.

Best regards,
baolu

>   
> Best regards
> Felix cui-oc
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月4日 9:12
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in 
> RMRR
> 
> Hi Felix,
> 
> On 2020/8/3 17:41, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi baolu,
>>   dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() parse ANDD structure and enumerated 
>> namespaces device in DRHD.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>   But the namespace device in RMRR is not enumerated, right?
> 
> It should be probed in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>>
>> Best regards
>> Felix cui-oc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: FelixCui-oc
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 17:02
>> 收件人: 'Lu Baolu' ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: RaymondPang-oc ; CobeChen-oc 
>> 
>> 主题: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in 
>> RMRR
>>
>> Hi  baolu:
>>  "The namespace devices are enumerated in 
>> probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
>>  It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and 
>> setup the identity mappings."
>>  
>>  This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
>> namespaces device as the pci device.
>>  In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
>> platform device or NULL.
>>  If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
>> NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
>>  So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
>> device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Felix cui
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
>> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
>> ; CobeChen-oc 
>> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in 
>> RMRR
>>
>> On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>>> Hi  baolu ,
>>> Yes ,that's right.
>>> This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
>>> RMRR region.
>>
>> The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
>> It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the 
>> identity mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Felix cui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -邮件

Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-04 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi,

On 8/4/20 11:11 AM, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu ,
When creating a identity mapping for a namespace device in RMRR, 
you need to add the namespace device to the rmrr->device[] , right?


Yes. You are right.

		The dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev() in patch adds the enumeration of the namespace device in RMRR. This is similar to > enumerating pci devices. Do you think this is unreasonable? If it is 

unreasonable, please tell me why it is unreasonable.

It looks reasonable. Thanks for the explanation.

But I don't think we need to add acpi_device_create_direct_mappings()
since the rmrr identity mapping is already done in the iommu core.

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月4日 9:12
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/3 17:41, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
 dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() parse ANDD structure and enumerated 
namespaces device in DRHD.


Yes.


 But the namespace device in RMRR is not enumerated, right?


It should be probed in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui-oc




-邮件原件-
发件人: FelixCui-oc
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 17:02
收件人: 'Lu Baolu' ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: RaymondPang-oc ; CobeChen-oc

主题: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi  baolu:
"The namespace devices are enumerated in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup 
the identity mappings."

This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
namespaces device as the pci device.
In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
platform device or NULL.
If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.

Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc
; CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu ,
Yes ,that's right.
This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
RMRR region.


The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the identity 
mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc
; CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu:
Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
reserved memory area.
So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope type 
ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping for > 
these ACPI devices.


So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but the 
identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the namespace devices fail 
to access the RMRR region."

Do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu


In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
distinguish acpi device from pci device.
You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
in vt-d spec.

Best regards
FelixCui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD)
; Raymond Pang(BJ-RD)

主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:

Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory
region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through

答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi  baolu ,
When creating a identity mapping for a namespace device in 
RMRR, you need to add the namespace device to the rmrr->device[] , right?
The dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev() in patch adds the enumeration of 
the namespace device in RMRR. This is similar to 
enumerating pci devices. Do you think this is unreasonable? If it is 
unreasonable, please tell me why it is unreasonable.

Best regards
Felix cui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月4日 9:12
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/3 17:41, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi baolu,
>dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() parse ANDD structure and enumerated 
> namespaces device in DRHD.

Yes.

>But the namespace device in RMRR is not enumerated, right?

It should be probed in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().

Best regards,
baolu

> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui-oc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: FelixCui-oc
> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 17:02
> 收件人: 'Lu Baolu' ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: RaymondPang-oc ; CobeChen-oc 
> 
> 主题: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> Hi  baolu:
>   "The namespace devices are enumerated in 
> probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
>   It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and 
> setup the identity mappings."
>   
>   This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
> namespaces device as the pci device.
>   In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
> platform device or NULL.
>   If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
> NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
>   So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
> device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.
> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi  baolu ,
>>  Yes ,that's right.
>>  This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
>> RMRR region.
> 
> The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
> It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the 
> identity mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>>
>> Best regards
>> Felix cui
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
>> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
>> ; CobeChen-oc 
>> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>>> Hi baolu:
>>> Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
>>> reserved memory area.
>>> So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
>>> RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
>>> At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
>>> scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
>>> This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope 
>>> type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping 
>>> for > these ACPI devices.
>>
>> So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but 
>> the identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the 
>> namespace devices fail to access the RMRR region."
>>
>> Do I understand it right?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
>>> In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
>>> distinguish acpi device from pci device.
>>> You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
>>> in vt-d spec.
>>>
>>> Bes

Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi Felix,

On 2020/8/3 17:41, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu,
 dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() parse ANDD structure and enumerated 
namespaces device in DRHD.


Yes.


 But the namespace device in RMRR is not enumerated, right?


It should be probed in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui-oc




-邮件原件-
发件人: FelixCui-oc
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 17:02
收件人: 'Lu Baolu' ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: RaymondPang-oc ; CobeChen-oc 

主题: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi  baolu:
"The namespace devices are enumerated in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup 
the identity mappings."

This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
namespaces device as the pci device.
In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
platform device or NULL.
If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.

Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu ,
Yes ,that's right.
This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
RMRR region.


The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the identity 
mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc
; CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu:
Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
reserved memory area.
So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope type 
ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping for > 
these ACPI devices.


So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but the 
identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the namespace devices fail 
to access the RMRR region."

Do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu


In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
distinguish acpi device from pci device.
You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
in vt-d spec.

Best regards
FelixCui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD)
; Raymond Pang(BJ-RD) 
主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:

Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory
region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR
structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish
identity mapping for ACPI device.


Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you mean 
some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not identity 
mapped?

Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.



Reported-by: kernel test robot 


No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
reported by lkp.

Best regards,
baolu


Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
 include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
 include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
 5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -215,

答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi baolu,
 dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() parse ANDD structure and enumerated 
namespaces device in DRHD.
 But the namespace device in RMRR is not enumerated, right?

Best regards
Felix cui-oc




-邮件原件-
发件人: FelixCui-oc 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 17:02
收件人: 'Lu Baolu' ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: RaymondPang-oc ; CobeChen-oc 

主题: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi  baolu:
"The namespace devices are enumerated in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and 
setup the identity mappings."

This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
namespaces device as the pci device.
In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
platform device or NULL.
If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.

Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi  baolu ,
>   Yes ,that's right.
>   This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
> RMRR region.

The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the identity 
mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?

Best regards,
baolu

> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi baolu:
>>  Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
>> reserved memory area.
>>  So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
>> RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
>>  At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
>> scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
>>  This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope 
>> type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping 
>> for > these ACPI devices.
> 
> So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but 
> the identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the 
> namespace devices fail to access the RMRR region."
> 
> Do I understand it right?
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>> In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
>> distinguish acpi device from pci device.
>>  You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
>> in vt-d spec.
>>
>> Best regards
>> FelixCui-oc
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
>> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) 
>> ; Raymond Pang(BJ-RD) 
>> 主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:
>>> Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory 
>>> region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR 
>>> structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish 
>>> identity mapping for ACPI device.
>>
>> Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you 
>> mean some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not 
>> identity mapped?
>>
>> Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.
>>
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot 
>>
>> No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
>> reported by lkp.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 

答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi  baolu:
"The namespace devices are enumerated in 
probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and 
setup the identity mappings."

This situation only applies to the physical node of the 
namespaces device as the pci device.
In fact, the physical node of the namespaces device can be a 
platform device or NULL.
If the physical node of the namespaces is a platform device or 
NULL, it has not actually been enumerated.
So it is necessary to increase the analysis of the namespaces 
device in RMRR and establish an identity mapping.

Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 16:26
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi  baolu ,
>   Yes ,that's right.
>   This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
> RMRR region.

The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the identity 
mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for you?

Best regards,
baolu

> 
> Best regards
> Felix cui
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc 
> ; CobeChen-oc 
> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:
>> Hi baolu:
>>  Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
>> reserved memory area.
>>  So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
>> RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
>>  At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
>> scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
>>  This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope 
>> type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping 
>> for > these ACPI devices.
> 
> So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but 
> the identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the 
> namespace devices fail to access the RMRR region."
> 
> Do I understand it right?
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>> In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
>> distinguish acpi device from pci device.
>>  You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
>> in vt-d spec.
>>
>> Best regards
>> FelixCui-oc
>>
>>
>>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
>> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
>> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
>> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
>> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) 
>> ; Raymond Pang(BJ-RD) 
>> 主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:
>>> Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory 
>>> region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR 
>>> structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish 
>>> identity mapping for ACPI device.
>>
>> Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you 
>> mean some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not 
>> identity mapped?
>>
>> Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.
>>
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot 
>>
>> No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
>> reported by lkp.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
>>> include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
>>> include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
>>> 5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu

Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread Lu Baolu

On 2020/8/3 14:52, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi  baolu ,
Yes ,that's right.
This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
RMRR region.


The namespace devices are enumerated in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
It calls iommu_probe_device() to process the enumeration and setup the
identity mappings. Can you please check why that code doesn't work for
you?

Best regards,
baolu



Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu:
Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
reserved memory area.
So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope type 
ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping for > 
these ACPI devices.


So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but the 
identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the namespace devices fail 
to access the RMRR region."

Do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu


In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
distinguish acpi device from pci device.
You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
in vt-d spec.

Best regards
FelixCui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel
; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) ;
Raymond Pang(BJ-RD) 
主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:

Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory
region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR
structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish identity
mapping for ACPI device.


Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you mean 
some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not identity 
mapped?

Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.



Reported-by: kernel test robot 


No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
reported by lkp.

Best regards,
baolu


Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
---
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct dmar_pci_notify_info 
*info, int bus,
}

/* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error

happens */ -int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info
*info,
+int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
  void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
  struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
  int devices_cnt)
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct
dmar_pci_notify_info *info)

		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,

struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
-   ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
+   ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
dmaru->segment,
dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt); @@ -696,48 
+696,56 @@
dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)

	return dmaru;

}
-
-static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
- struct acpi_device *adev)
+int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
+   struct acpi_device *adev,
+   void *start, void *end,
+   struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
+   int devices_cnt)
{
-   struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
-   struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
struct acpi_dmar_device_scope 

答复: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi  baolu ,
Yes ,that's right.
This patch is to achieve acpi namespace devices to access the 
RMRR region.

Best regards
Felix cui




-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 14:19
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; RaymondPang-oc ; 
CobeChen-oc 
主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:
> Hi baolu:
>   Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
> reserved memory area.
>   So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
> RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
>   At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
> scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
>   This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope 
> type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping 
> for > these ACPI devices.

So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed, but the 
identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result, the namespace 
devices fail to access the RMRR region."

Do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu

> In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
> distinguish acpi device from pci device.
>   You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
> in vt-d spec.
> 
> Best regards
> FelixCui-oc
> 
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Lu Baolu 
> 发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
> 收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel 
> ; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 
> 抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) ; 
> Raymond Pang(BJ-RD) 
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:
>> Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory 
>> region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR 
>> structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish identity 
>> mapping for ACPI device.
> 
> Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you 
> mean some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not 
> identity mapped?
> 
> Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.
> 
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot 
> 
> No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
> reported by lkp.
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu
> 
>> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
>> ---
>>drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
>>drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
>>drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
>>include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
>>include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
>>5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c 
>> index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct 
>> dmar_pci_notify_info *info, int bus,
>>}
>>
>>/* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error 
>> happens */ -int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info 
>> *info,
>> +int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
>>void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
>>struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
>>int devices_cnt)
>> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct 
>> dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
>>
>>  drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
>>  struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
>> -ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
>> +ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
>>  ((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
>>  dmaru->segment,
>>  dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt); @@ -696,48 
>> +696,56 @@ 
>> dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>
>>  return dmaru;
>>}
>> -
>> -static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
>> -  struct acpi_device *adev)
>> +int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
>> +  

Re: 答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-03 Thread Lu Baolu

Hi,

On 2020/8/3 12:40, FelixCui-oc wrote:

Hi baolu:
Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
reserved memory area.
So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope type 
ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping for > 
these ACPI devices.


So the problem is "although namespace devices in RMRR have been parsed,
but the identity map for those devices aren't created. As the result,
the namespace devices fail to access the RMRR region."

Do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu


In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in order to 
distinguish acpi device from pci device.
You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
in vt-d spec.

Best regards
FelixCui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu 
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) ; Raymond 
Pang(BJ-RD) 
主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:

Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory
region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR
structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish identity
mapping for ACPI device.


Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you mean 
some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not identity 
mapped?

Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.



Reported-by: kernel test robot 


No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
reported by lkp.

Best regards,
baolu


Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
---
   drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
   drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
   include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
   include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
   5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct dmar_pci_notify_info 
*info, int bus,
   }
   
   /* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error

happens */ -int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info
*info,
+int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
  void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
  struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
  int devices_cnt)
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct
dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
   
   		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,

struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
-   ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
+   ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
dmaru->segment,
dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt); @@ -696,48 
+696,56 @@
dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
   
   	return dmaru;

   }
-
-static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
- struct acpi_device *adev)
+int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
+   struct acpi_device *adev,
+   void *start, void *end,
+   struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
+   int devices_cnt)
   {
-   struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
-   struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
struct acpi_dmar_device_scope *scope;
struct device *tmp;
int i;
struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *path;
   
+	for (; start < end; start += scope->length) {

+   scope = start;
+   if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
+   continue;
+   if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
+   continue;
+   path = (void *)(scope + 1);
+   for_each_dev_scope(devices, devices_cnt, i, tmp)
+   if (tmp == NULL) {
+   devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
+   devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device, 
path->function);
+   rcu_assign_pointer(devices[i].dev,
+  

答复: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-08-02 Thread FelixCui-oc
Hi baolu:
Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access the 
reserved memory area.
So bios uses the device scope type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in 
RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
At present, there is no analysis in the kernel that the device 
scope type in RMRR is ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE.
This patch is mainly to add the analysis of the device scope 
type ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR structure and establish identity mapping for 
these ACPI devices. In addition, some naming changes have been made in patch in 
order to distinguish acpi device from pci device.
You can refer to the description of type in 8.3.1 device scope 
in vt-d spec.

Best regards
FelixCui-oc



-邮件原件-
发件人: Lu Baolu  
发送时间: 2020年8月3日 10:32
收件人: FelixCui-oc ; Joerg Roedel ; 
io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse 

抄送: baolu...@linux.intel.com; Cobe Chen(BJ-RD) ; Raymond 
Pang(BJ-RD) 
主题: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d:Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

Hi,

On 8/2/20 6:07 PM, FelixCuioc wrote:
> Some ACPI devices require access to the specified reserved memory 
> region.BIOS report the specified reserved memory region through RMRR 
> structures.Add analysis of ACPI device in RMRR and establish identity 
> mapping for ACPI device.

Can you please add more words about the problem you want to solve? Do you mean 
some RMRRs are not enumerated correctly? Or, enumerated, but not identity 
mapped?

Nit: add version and change log once you refreshed your patch.

> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot 

No need to add this. The problem you want to solve through this patch is not 
reported by lkp.

Best regards,
baolu

> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc 
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 -
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 46 ++-
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c   |  6 +++
>   include/linux/dmar.h| 12 +-
>   include/linux/iommu.h   |  3 ++
>   5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c 
> index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct 
> dmar_pci_notify_info *info, int bus,
>   }
>   
>   /* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error 
> happens */ -int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info 
> *info,
> +int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
> void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
> struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
> int devices_cnt)
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct 
> dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
>   
>   drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
>   struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
> - ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
> + ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
>   ((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
>   dmaru->segment,
>   dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt); @@ -696,48 
> +696,56 @@ 
> dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   
>   return dmaru;
>   }
> -
> -static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
> -   struct acpi_device *adev)
> +int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
> + struct acpi_device *adev,
> + void *start, void *end,
> + struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
> + int devices_cnt)
>   {
> - struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
> - struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
>   struct acpi_dmar_device_scope *scope;
>   struct device *tmp;
>   int i;
>   struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *path;
>   
> + for (; start < end; start += scope->length) {
> + scope = start;
> + if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
> + continue;
> + if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
> + continue;
> + path = (void *)(scope + 1);
> + for_each_dev_scope(devices, devices_cnt, i, tmp)
> + if (tmp == NULL) {
> + devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
> + devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device, 
> path->function);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(devices[i].dev,
> +get_device(>dev));
> + return 1;
> + }
> + WARN_ON(i >= devices_cnt);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev(u8 device_number,