Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': > >> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_boot_table_init' > >> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_boot_init' > > > > > > > > diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h > > --- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 > > 00:14:46.0 -0700 > > +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700 > > @@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ; > [patch snipped] > > Yes, that worked with no CONFIG_ACPI. Thanks. OK, I'll keep spamming the acpi guys with it until they tell me to shut up. > On a slightly offtopic note, I'm now using this gcc: > gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050308 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.32) > > I don't have any quantitative data at hand, this seems SLW. > I guess that's progress. But it slows down testing somewhat. > There's a reason why I persist in keeping the kernel working with gcc-2.95.4! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Andrew Morton wrote: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init' diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h --- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 00:14:46.0 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700 @@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ; [patch snipped] Yes, that worked with no CONFIG_ACPI. Thanks. On a slightly offtopic note, I'm now using this gcc: gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050308 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.32) I don't have any quantitative data at hand, this seems SLW. I guess that's progress. But it slows down testing somewhat. Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
>@Len: >ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with >X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. yeah, don't do that:-) I'm sorry I didn't push the patch to delete CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT earlier. For now, just enable them both. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
@Len: ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. yeah, don't do that:-) I'm sorry I didn't push the patch to delete CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT earlier. For now, just enable them both. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Andrew Morton wrote: Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init' diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h --- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 00:14:46.0 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700 @@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ; [patch snipped] Yes, that worked with no CONFIG_ACPI. Thanks. On a slightly offtopic note, I'm now using this gcc: gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050308 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.32) I don't have any quantitative data at hand, this seems SLW. I guess that's progress. But it slows down testing somewhat. Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init' diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h --- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 00:14:46.0 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700 @@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ; [patch snipped] Yes, that worked with no CONFIG_ACPI. Thanks. OK, I'll keep spamming the acpi guys with it until they tell me to shut up. On a slightly offtopic note, I'm now using this gcc: gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050308 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.32) I don't have any quantitative data at hand, this seems SLW. I guess that's progress. But it slows down testing somewhat. There's a reason why I persist in keeping the kernel working with gcc-2.95.4! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function
> 'acpi_boot_table_init'
> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function
> 'acpi_boot_init'
diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h
--- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 00:14:46.0
-0700
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700
@@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ;
#define acpi_mp_config 0
-static inline int acpi_boot_init(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int acpi_boot_table_init(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
#endif /*!CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT*/
unsigned int acpi_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int edge_level, int active_high_low);
@@ -538,5 +528,18 @@ static inline int acpi_get_pxm(acpi_hand
extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
+#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
+
+static inline int acpi_boot_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int acpi_boot_table_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
+
#endif /* _LINUX_ACPI_H */
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi again At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Hi Reuben, ... Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled through, and this one.. ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1823): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1828): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]# Backing out bk-acpi.patch works around it.. Please send your .config . Have just figured out that it seems to be caused by having ACPI disabled in .config, once I re-enabled ACPI the build problem went away. Config attached anyway, I imagine the problem is quite reproduceable.. Ah, this was the working .config . fter setting CONFIG_ACPI=n I started seeing different but most likely related problems. @Len: ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. Here is some additional and hopefully helpful information. Without CONFIG_ACPI=y, I first got: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init' and then at the end: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1b81): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1b86): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 With these set linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm1 built OK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm1]$ grep ^CONFIG_ACPI .config CONFIG_ACPI=y CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > Hi again > > At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >Hi Reuben, > > > >>... > >> Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled > >> through, and this one.. > >>... > >> LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > >> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1823): In function `setup_arch': > >> : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' > >> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1828): In function `setup_arch': > >> : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' > >> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]# > >> > >> Backing out bk-acpi.patch works around it.. > > > >Please send your .config . > > Have just figured out that it seems to be caused by having ACPI > disabled in .config, once I re-enabled ACPI the build problem went away. > > Config attached anyway, I imagine the problem is quite reproduceable.. Ah, this was the working .config . fter setting CONFIG_ACPI=n I started seeing different but most likely related problems. @Len: ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. The first error I get is: <-- snip --> CC arch/i386/kernel/setup.o arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: error: parse error before "acpi_sci_flags" arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `acpi_sci_flags' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: warning: data definition has no type or storage class arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function `parse_cmdline_early': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:811: error: request for member `trigger' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:814: error: request for member `trigger' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:817: error: request for member `polarity' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:820: error: request for member `polarity' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function `setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function `acpi_boot_init' make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/setup.o] Error 1 make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2 <-- snip --> > Reuben cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi again At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Hi Reuben, ... Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled through, and this one.. ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1823): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1828): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]# Backing out bk-acpi.patch works around it.. Please send your .config . Have just figured out that it seems to be caused by having ACPI disabled in .config, once I re-enabled ACPI the build problem went away. Config attached anyway, I imagine the problem is quite reproduceable.. Ah, this was the working .config . fter setting CONFIG_ACPI=n I started seeing different but most likely related problems. @Len: ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. Here is some additional and hopefully helpful information. Without CONFIG_ACPI=y, I first got: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init' and then at the end: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1b81): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1b86): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 With these set linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm1 built OK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm1]$ grep ^CONFIG_ACPI .config CONFIG_ACPI=y CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boot_table_init'
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boot_init'
diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h
--- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 00:14:46.0
-0700
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h2005-04-05 00:23:39.0 -0700
@@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ;
#define acpi_mp_config 0
-static inline int acpi_boot_init(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int acpi_boot_table_init(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
#endif /*!CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT*/
unsigned int acpi_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int edge_level, int active_high_low);
@@ -538,5 +528,18 @@ static inline int acpi_get_pxm(acpi_hand
extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
+#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
+
+static inline int acpi_boot_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int acpi_boot_table_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
+
#endif /* _LINUX_ACPI_H */
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi again At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Hi Reuben, ... Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled through, and this one.. ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1823): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x1828): In function `setup_arch': : undefined reference to `acpi_boot_init' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]# Backing out bk-acpi.patch works around it.. Please send your .config . Have just figured out that it seems to be caused by having ACPI disabled in .config, once I re-enabled ACPI the build problem went away. Config attached anyway, I imagine the problem is quite reproduceable.. Ah, this was the working .config . fter setting CONFIG_ACPI=n I started seeing different but most likely related problems. @Len: ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. The first error I get is: -- snip -- CC arch/i386/kernel/setup.o arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: error: parse error before acpi_sci_flags arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `acpi_sci_flags' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:96: warning: data definition has no type or storage class arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function `parse_cmdline_early': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:811: error: request for member `trigger' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:814: error: request for member `trigger' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:817: error: request for member `polarity' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:820: error: request for member `polarity' in something not a structure or union arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function `setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function `acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function `acpi_boot_init' make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/setup.o] Error 1 make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2 -- snip -- Reuben cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
