Re: 2.6.23-rc8-git2 possible recursive locking when running screen

2007-10-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:24, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> Seen this a few times lately on a machine running rawhide when running
> screen (and doing "something", it's not automatic. And box works just fine).
> I think I saw this a few weeks back, so it's not a new regression.

Did it happen with 2.6.22?

Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: 2.6.23-rc8-git2 possible recursive locking when running screen

2007-10-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:24, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
 Seen this a few times lately on a machine running rawhide when running
 screen (and doing something, it's not automatic. And box works just fine).
 I think I saw this a few weeks back, so it's not a new regression.

Did it happen with 2.6.22?

Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


2.6.23-rc8-git2 possible recursive locking when running screen

2007-10-03 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
Seen this a few times lately on a machine running rawhide when running
screen (and doing "something", it's not automatic. And box works just fine).
I think I saw this a few weeks back, so it's not a new regression.

=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.23-0.211.rc8.git2.fc8 #1
-
screen/32227 is trying to acquire lock:
 (>lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

but task is already holding lock:
 (>lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by screen/32227:
 #0:  (>atomic_read_lock){--..}, at: [] read_chan+0x1a1/0x5af
 #1:  (>lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

stack backtrace:
 [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
 [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
 [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
 [] __lock_acquire+0x189/0xc67
 [] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9e
 [] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x4a/0x77
 [] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
 [] ep_poll_safewake+0x86/0xa8
 [] ep_poll_callback+0x9f/0xaa
 [] __wake_up_common+0x32/0x55
 [] __wake_up+0x31/0x42
 [] tty_wakeup+0x4f/0x54
 [] pty_unthrottle+0x15/0x21
 [] check_unthrottle+0x2e/0x30
 [] read_chan+0x4ac/0x5af
 [] tty_read+0x66/0xac
 [] vfs_read+0xad/0x167
 [] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
 [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 ===
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


2.6.23-rc8-git2 possible recursive locking when running screen

2007-10-03 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
Seen this a few times lately on a machine running rawhide when running
screen (and doing something, it's not automatic. And box works just fine).
I think I saw this a few weeks back, so it's not a new regression.

=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.23-0.211.rc8.git2.fc8 #1
-
screen/32227 is trying to acquire lock:
 (q-lock){++..}, at: [c0426703] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

but task is already holding lock:
 (q-lock){++..}, at: [c0426703] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by screen/32227:
 #0:  (tty-atomic_read_lock){--..}, at: [c0554ca2] read_chan+0x1a1/0x5af
 #1:  (q-lock){++..}, at: [c0426703] __wake_up+0x15/0x42

stack backtrace:
 [c0406463] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
 [c0406e4d] show_trace+0x12/0x14
 [c0406e65] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
 [c0449c3a] __lock_acquire+0x189/0xc67
 [c044ab92] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9e
 [c06334fa] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x4a/0x77
 [c0426703] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
 [c04aece2] ep_poll_safewake+0x86/0xa8
 [c04af969] ep_poll_callback+0x9f/0xaa
 [c042483e] __wake_up_common+0x32/0x55
 [c042671f] __wake_up+0x31/0x42
 [c054f864] tty_wakeup+0x4f/0x54
 [c0555e9b] pty_unthrottle+0x15/0x21
 [c055301b] check_unthrottle+0x2e/0x30
 [c0554fad] read_chan+0x4ac/0x5af
 [c0551c99] tty_read+0x66/0xac
 [c0489fee] vfs_read+0xad/0x167
 [c048a482] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
 [c040522e] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 ===
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/