Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
On Tue, Oct 17 2000, Thomas Molina wrote: > CD Recording seems to work correctly under 2.4.0-test10-pre3. I'm using > cdrecord 1.9 with a Phillips CDD3610. However, playing back an audio cd > using cdp gives the following error: > > sr0: CDROM (ioctl) reports ILLEGAL REQUEST. > > CDROMPLAYTRKIND: Operation not supported cd app players can't use CDROMPLAYTRKIND and expect it to always work. It will fail on most setups with ide-scsi -- * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Murray wrote: > On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, David Riley wrote: > > > safemode wrote: > > > > > > I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with > > > 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? > > > Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't > > > mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi > > > bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. > > > anyone? > > > > Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the > > sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces > > shiny coasters" or something similar. > > It actually is in the "Fixed" section of the TODO list, and it did seem > to be working for me on the weekend, as I burnt a couple of disks (one at > 8x) under 2.4.0-test9 without any errors. That's with a relatively new > Matushita 8/4/32 CD-RW drive and cdrecord 1.8. CD Recording seems to work correctly under 2.4.0-test10-pre3. I'm using cdrecord 1.9 with a Phillips CDD3610. However, playing back an audio cd using cdp gives the following error: sr0: CDROM (ioctl) reports ILLEGAL REQUEST. CDROMPLAYTRKIND: Operation not supported There may have been a patch posted on the kernel list for this. As I'm having trouble accessing the archives at the moment I'm unable to test it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Murray wrote: On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, David Riley wrote: safemode wrote: I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. anyone? Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces shiny coasters" or something similar. It actually is in the "Fixed" section of the TODO list, and it did seem to be working for me on the weekend, as I burnt a couple of disks (one at 8x) under 2.4.0-test9 without any errors. That's with a relatively new Matushita 8/4/32 CD-RW drive and cdrecord 1.8. CD Recording seems to work correctly under 2.4.0-test10-pre3. I'm using cdrecord 1.9 with a Phillips CDD3610. However, playing back an audio cd using cdp gives the following error: sr0: CDROM (ioctl) reports ILLEGAL REQUEST. CDROMPLAYTRKIND: Operation not supported There may have been a patch posted on the kernel list for this. As I'm having trouble accessing the archives at the moment I'm unable to test it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, David Riley wrote: > safemode wrote: > > > > I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with > > 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? > > Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't > > mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi > > bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. > > anyone? > > Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the > sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces > shiny coasters" or something similar. It actually is in the "Fixed" section of the TODO list, and it did seem to be working for me on the weekend, as I burnt a couple of disks (one at 8x) under 2.4.0-test9 without any errors. That's with a relatively new Matushita 8/4/32 CD-RW drive and cdrecord 1.8. Scott -- = Scott Murrayemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.interlog.com/~scottm ICQ: 10602428 - "Good, bad ... I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash, "Army of Darkness" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, David Riley wrote: safemode wrote: I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. anyone? Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces shiny coasters" or something similar. It actually is in the "Fixed" section of the TODO list, and it did seem to be working for me on the weekend, as I burnt a couple of disks (one at 8x) under 2.4.0-test9 without any errors. That's with a relatively new Matushita 8/4/32 CD-RW drive and cdrecord 1.8. Scott -- = Scott Murrayemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.interlog.com/~scottm ICQ: 10602428 - "Good, bad ... I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash, "Army of Darkness" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
safemode wrote: > > I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with > 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? > Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't > mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi > bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. > anyone? Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces shiny coasters" or something similar. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
safemode wrote: I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. anyone? Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces shiny coasters" or something similar. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. anyone? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?
I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's? Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection. anyone? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
