Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > >> I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to > >> "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as > >> /dev/sda. > >> The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made was that instead of > >> the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver > >> (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the > >> probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the > >> ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix > >> had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. > > > > Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios > > is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and > > SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other > > hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide > > registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would > > guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. > > Mostly true... "standard IDE" can be configured in two modes, legacy > mode and native mode. Legacy mode has fixed addresses originating from > the ISA days (0x170, 0x1f0, irqs 14 & 15), and (as you implied) you > cannot bind two IDE controllers to the same ISA addresses. > > OTOH, an unlimited number of IDE controllers can be configured into > native mode, where all addresses and irq are allocated using standard > means accorded all PCI devices. In the situation being discussed, "ATA/IDE Mode" was set to "Native" in the BIOS (the other option for this item was "Legacy"). The BIOS had a separate "Configure SATA as" item with the options RAID, IDE and AHCI and it is this one which, when set to IDE, prevented Linux from finding the Marvell PATA chip - even though "ATA/IDE Mode" was set to "native". The legacy/native issue Jeff discusses sounds like it relates to the "ATA/IDE Mode" BIOS setting. Since this was always "Native" during the tests and given what Jeff wrote, I would have thought the BIOS would not be using the legacy ISA-era settings and therefore they were not the reason for Linux not finding the Marvell PATA controller. Regards jonathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jeff Garzik wrote: Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. Mostly true... standard IDE can be configured in two modes, legacy mode and native mode. Legacy mode has fixed addresses originating from the ISA days (0x170, 0x1f0, irqs 14 15), and (as you implied) you cannot bind two IDE controllers to the same ISA addresses. OTOH, an unlimited number of IDE controllers can be configured into native mode, where all addresses and irq are allocated using standard means accorded all PCI devices. In the situation being discussed, ATA/IDE Mode was set to Native in the BIOS (the other option for this item was Legacy). The BIOS had a separate Configure SATA as item with the options RAID, IDE and AHCI and it is this one which, when set to IDE, prevented Linux from finding the Marvell PATA chip - even though ATA/IDE Mode was set to native. The legacy/native issue Jeff discusses sounds like it relates to the ATA/IDE Mode BIOS setting. Since this was always Native during the tests and given what Jeff wrote, I would have thought the BIOS would not be using the legacy ISA-era settings and therefore they were not the reason for Linux not finding the Marvell PATA controller. Regards jonathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. Mostly true... "standard IDE" can be configured in two modes, legacy mode and native mode. Legacy mode has fixed addresses originating from the ISA days (0x170, 0x1f0, irqs 14 & 15), and (as you implied) you cannot bind two IDE controllers to the same ISA addresses. OTOH, an unlimited number of IDE controllers can be configured into native mode, where all addresses and irq are allocated using standard means accorded all PCI devices. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to > "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. > The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made was that instead of > the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver > (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the > probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the > ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix > had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Linux can still detect the chip and drive it natively even if the bios is emulating IDE/PATA on the chip. And libata will make both PATA and SATA show up as /dev/sda now if you use libata for both. On the other hand if the bios has configured the intel chip to use the standard ide registers, then it can't have configured the marvell to do so I would guess, which could make it difficult to talk to. Mostly true... standard IDE can be configured in two modes, legacy mode and native mode. Legacy mode has fixed addresses originating from the ISA days (0x170, 0x1f0, irqs 14 15), and (as you implied) you cannot bind two IDE controllers to the same ISA addresses. OTOH, an unlimited number of IDE controllers can be configured into native mode, where all addresses and irq are allocated using standard means accorded all PCI devices. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Len Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > > The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. > > > > It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a > > combination of issues. > > > > 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must > > be configured. > > > > 2) Unless the "Configure SATA as" setting in the BIOS is set to "AHCI" the > > PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, > > but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the > > other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. > > Maybe the SATA pretending to be PATA took up the ports that the marvell > PATA needed to provide PATA, so in effect hidding the marvell. I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Regards jonathan -- "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Len Sorensen wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a combination of issues. 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must be configured. 2) Unless the Configure SATA as setting in the BIOS is set to AHCI the PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. Maybe the SATA pretending to be PATA took up the ports that the marvell PATA needed to provide PATA, so in effect hidding the marvell. I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda. The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was that instead of the drive being handled by the ata_piix it now utilises the ahci driver (which is a much better driver). The other interesting thing is that the probe for the Marvell PATA device occured before the initialisation of the ata_piix driver (or ahci for that matter), so as far as I can tell ata_piix had no chance to grab any ports before the marvell driver initialised. Regards jonathan -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. > > It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a > combination of issues. > > 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must > be configured. > > 2) Unless the "Configure SATA as" setting in the BIOS is set to "AHCI" the > PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, > but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the > other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. Maybe the SATA pretending to be PATA took up the ports that the marvell PATA needed to provide PATA, so in effect hidding the marvell. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a combination of issues. 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must be configured. 2) Unless the Configure SATA as setting in the BIOS is set to AHCI the PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. Maybe the SATA pretending to be PATA took up the ports that the marvell PATA needed to provide PATA, so in effect hidding the marvell. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Hi Bill > > A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard > > (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE > > CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any > > problems. > > > Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in POST at cold boot. It may > need some BIOS setting to be visible. The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a combination of issues. 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must be configured. 2) Unless the "Configure SATA as" setting in the BIOS is set to "AHCI" the PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. Regards jonathan -- "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Hi Bill A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in POST at cold boot. It may need some BIOS setting to be visible. The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases. It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a combination of issues. 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must be configured. 2) Unless the Configure SATA as setting in the BIOS is set to AHCI the PATA controller won't be found. Sounds a bit odd and counter-intuitive, but that's what's happening. Originally this item was set to IDE; the other option is RAID but I haven't tested that. Regards jonathan -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in POST at cold boot. It may need some BIOS setting to be visible. -- Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in POST at cold boot. It may need some BIOS setting to be visible. -- Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Holger Eitzenberger wrote: just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance? NCQ support, CPU cycle savings, no silly DMA limits (supports larger clustered chunks of data, less bouncing), supports 64-bit (no bouncing on 64-bit), eliminates use of PIO, the list goes on. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS > settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the > controller into AHCI mode for best performance. Hi, just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance? /holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. Hi, just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance? /holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Holger Eitzenberger wrote: just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance? NCQ support, CPU cycle savings, no silly DMA limits (supports larger clustered chunks of data, less bouncing), supports 64-bit (no bouncing on 64-bit), eliminates use of PIO, the list goes on. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
> > Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just > > booted has this set to "y" (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not > > detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel > > was 2.6.22-rc2. > > Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip so you might need > to do some debugging and provide more detail. I got someone to go into the BIOS setup (I am debugging this remotely) and check the IDE/ATA related options. The two relevant options were set as follows: ATA/IDE Mode: [ Choices: Legacy, Native ] Configure SATA as: [ Choices: IDE, RAID, AHCI ] I had them change the "Configure SATA as" setting from "IDE" to "AHCI" and then reboot into 2.6.22-rc2. At this point things appear to be much happier: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ahci :00:1f.2: version 2.1 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 6 ports 3 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode ahci :00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq led clo pio slum part PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ahci : scsi5 : ahci ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf882a100 ctl 0x bmdma 0x irq 0 : ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf882a380 ctl 0x bmdma 0x irq 0 ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) : ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off : sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :02:00.0 to 64 scsi6 : pata_marvell scsi7 : pata_marvell ata7: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00011018 ctl 0x00011026 bmdma 0x00011000 irq 0 ata8: DUMMY BAR5:00:00 01:7F 02:22 03:CA 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 0A:00 0B:00 0C:01 0D:00 0E:00 0F:00 ata7.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66 ata7.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable ata7.00: configured for UDMA/33 scsi 6:0:0:0: CD-ROMSONY DVD RW DRU-830A SS25 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 40x/40x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 sr 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 sr 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5 Therefore it seems that for whatever reason, the marvell_pata driver will only find the Marvell PATA IDE controller if the *SATA* mode in the BIOS is set to "AHCI". It's somewhat counter-intuitive, but since AHCI is the "correct" setting for SATA performance reasons it's probably not such a bad thing. So, thanks for all the suggestions; the problem appears solved. Regards jonathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
> Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just > booted has this set to "y" (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not > detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel > was 2.6.22-rc2. Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip so you might need to do some debugging and provide more detail. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
> > 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device > > 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: > > Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master, > > fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10 > : > Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for your PATA stuff (my board is the > same). Try the latest Marvell driver, it seems to drive my machine ok. > For older kernels, I think you can pass 'all-generic-ide' on the boot > line to get the old IDE layer to drive the device. Oh dear, would you believe I totally missed this entry in a dozen runs though the output yesterday? A fresh pair of eyes always helps. > This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell. Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just booted has this set to "y" (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel was 2.6.22-rc2. Regards jonathan -- "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:05 pm Jonathan Woithe wrote: > 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device > 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: > Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master, > fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10 > I/O ports at 1018 [size=8] > I/O ports at 1024 [size=4] > I/O ports at 1010 [size=8] > I/O ports at 1020 [size=4] > I/O ports at 1000 [size=16] > Memory at 9010 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512] > Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2 > Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 > Enable- Capabilities: [e0] Express Legacy Endpoint IRQ 0 Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for your PATA stuff (my board is the same). Try the latest Marvell driver, it seems to drive my machine ok. For older kernels, I think you can pass 'all-generic-ide' on the boot line to get the old IDE layer to drive the device. Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell. > 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev > b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) > Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 > Does this apply to *all* SATA controllers or just these ICHx ones from > Intel? In other words, should all optimally configured SATA controllers > be in AHCI mode? If they have an AHCI mode then currently yes. AHCI is a well designed interface with nice functionality. None of the devices which support multiple modes of operation have any custom mode that is nicer .. so far anyway. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
> Jonathan Woithe wrote: > > I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under > > the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except > > those labelled "highly experimental"). As far as I can tell the > > CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the > > kernel. Maybe I do need one of those "highly experimental" drivers. > > Can you post the entire lspci -v for this board? Sure. Here it is: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Capabilities: [e0] Vendor Specific Information 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 Memory at 9020 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] Memory at 8000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] I/O ports at 2140 [size=8] Capabilities: [90] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 00:03.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 HECI Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11 Memory at 90325900 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [8c] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566DC Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 0001 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 218 Memory at 9030 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Memory at 90324000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] I/O ports at 20c0 [size=32] Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [d0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable+ 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 I/O ports at 20a0 [size=32] 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI #5 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20 I/O ports at 2080 [size=32] 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI #2 (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at 90325400 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] Debug port 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 2503 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 23 Memory at 9032 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [70] Express Unknown type IRQ 0 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 Memory behind bridge: 9040-904f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 1000-1fff Memory behind bridge: 9010-901f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0 Memory behind bridge: 9050-905f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
O> What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as > "n port SATA" controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a > PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Later ICH is listed by the documentation I have as SATA only. I would imagine there is a seperate Jmicron or Marvell PATA controller on the system ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except those labelled "highly experimental"). As far as I can tell the CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the kernel. Maybe I do need one of those "highly experimental" drivers. Can you post the entire lspci -v for this board? Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. I've often wondered how the BIOS descriptions correlate with the modes the controller ends up in. I've always gone for things like "enhanced" or "SATA" or "native" (the exact string of course being dependent on the BIOS writer's mood on the day). This seems to work out OK in practice. How can you tell from the Linux boot messages that the controller is in AHCI mode - is it as simple as looking for AHCI driver messages? In this case the scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix indicate that things are suboptimal I assume. Right, you should see that showing up as ahci. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
> Jonathan Woithe wrote: > > A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard > > (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE > > CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any > > problems. > > > > Relevant parts from lspci: > > > > 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) > > 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA > > IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) > > Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d > > Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 > > > > 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) > > 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA > > IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) > > Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d > > Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 > > > > What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as > > "n port SATA" controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a > > PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. > > > > Boot messages: > > > > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with > > idebus=xx > > Probing IDE interface ide0... > > Probing IDE interface ide1... > > : > > ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 > > ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > > PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 > > scsi0 : ata_piix > > scsi1 : ata_piix > > ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 > > irq 0 > > ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 > > irq 0 > > ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 > > ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 > > ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) > > ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 > > ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 > > scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 > > ANSI: 5 > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't > > support DPO or FUA > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't > > support DPO or FUA > > sda: sda1 sda2 > > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk > > ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] > > > > Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) > > isn't. > > > > libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. > > In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are > > defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected > > including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, > > BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA > > (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be > > provided if requested. > > A lot of newer Intel boards have the IDE interface provided by an > external JMicron, etc. chip so you may need to enable that driver for > things to work. I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except those labelled "highly experimental"). As far as I can tell the CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the kernel. Maybe I do need one of those "highly experimental" drivers. > Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS > settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller > into AHCI mode for best performance. I've often wondered how the BIOS descriptions correlate with the modes the controller ends up in. I've always gone for things like "enhanced" or "SATA" or "native" (the exact string of course being dependent on the BIOS writer's mood on the day). This seems to work out OK in practice. How can you tell from the Linux boot messages that the controller is in AHCI mode - is it as simple as looking for AHCI driver messages? In this case the scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix indicate that things are suboptimal I assume. Regards jonathan -- "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Relevant parts from lspci: 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as "n port SATA" controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Boot messages: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 irq 0 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 irq 0 ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) isn't. libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be provided if requested. A lot of newer Intel boards have the IDE interface provided by an external JMicron, etc. chip so you may need to enable that driver for things to work. Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Relevant parts from lspci: 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as "n port SATA" controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Boot messages: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 irq 0 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 irq 0 ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) isn't. libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be provided if requested. Regards jonathan -- "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Relevant parts from lspci: 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as n port SATA controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Boot messages: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 irq 0 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 irq 0 ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) isn't. libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be provided if requested. Regards jonathan -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Relevant parts from lspci: 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as n port SATA controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Boot messages: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 irq 0 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 irq 0 ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) isn't. libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be provided if requested. A lot of newer Intel boards have the IDE interface provided by an external JMicron, etc. chip so you may need to enable that driver for things to work. Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove nospam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any problems. Relevant parts from lspci: 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 4 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 00:1f.5 0101: 8086:2825 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 85 [Master SecO PriO]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as n port SATA controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Boot messages: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.11 ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012138 ctl 0x00012156 bmdma 0x00012110 irq 0 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00012130 ctl 0x00012152 bmdma 0x00012118 irq 0 ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00012137 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sda1 sda2 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ata_piix :00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ] Here the HDD is clearly detected while the CDROM/DVDROM (attached to ide0) isn't. libata is compiled into the kernel as is the non-libata PATA driver. In the libata configuration, only SATA_AHCI, ATA_PIIX and ATA_GENERIC are defined. For the non-libata side of things most options are selected including BLK_DEV_IDE, BLK_DEV_IDECD, IDE_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEPCI, BLK_DEV_GENERIC, BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI and BLK_DEV_PIIX. Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is a problem detecting the PATA (IDE) CDROM/DVDROM in this machine? Further information/testing can be provided if requested. A lot of newer Intel boards have the IDE interface provided by an external JMicron, etc. chip so you may need to enable that driver for things to work. I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except those labelled highly experimental). As far as I can tell the CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the kernel. Maybe I do need one of those highly experimental drivers. Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. I've often wondered how the BIOS descriptions correlate with the modes the controller ends up in. I've always gone for things like enhanced or SATA or native (the exact string of course being dependent on the BIOS writer's mood on the day). This seems to work out OK in practice. How can you tell from the Linux boot messages that the controller is in AHCI mode - is it as simple as looking for AHCI driver messages? In this case the scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix indicate that things are suboptimal I assume. Regards jonathan -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except those labelled highly experimental). As far as I can tell the CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the kernel. Maybe I do need one of those highly experimental drivers. Can you post the entire lspci -v for this board? Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the controller into AHCI mode for best performance. I've often wondered how the BIOS descriptions correlate with the modes the controller ends up in. I've always gone for things like enhanced or SATA or native (the exact string of course being dependent on the BIOS writer's mood on the day). This seems to work out OK in practice. How can you tell from the Linux boot messages that the controller is in AHCI mode - is it as simple as looking for AHCI driver messages? In this case the scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix indicate that things are suboptimal I assume. Right, you should see that showing up as ahci. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove nospam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
O What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as n port SATA controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though. Later ICH is listed by the documentation I have as SATA only. I would imagine there is a seperate Jmicron or Marvell PATA controller on the system ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell. 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Does this apply to *all* SATA controllers or just these ICHx ones from Intel? In other words, should all optimally configured SATA controllers be in AHCI mode? If they have an AHCI mode then currently yes. AHCI is a well designed interface with nice functionality. None of the devices which support multiple modes of operation have any custom mode that is nicer .. so far anyway. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:05 pm Jonathan Woithe wrote: 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10 I/O ports at 1018 [size=8] I/O ports at 1024 [size=4] I/O ports at 1010 [size=8] I/O ports at 1020 [size=4] I/O ports at 1000 [size=16] Memory at 9010 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512] Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [e0] Express Legacy Endpoint IRQ 0 Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for your PATA stuff (my board is the same). Try the latest Marvell driver, it seems to drive my machine ok. For older kernels, I think you can pass 'all-generic-ide' on the boot line to get the old IDE layer to drive the device. Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Jonathan Woithe wrote: I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except those labelled highly experimental). As far as I can tell the CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these built into the kernel. Maybe I do need one of those highly experimental drivers. Can you post the entire lspci -v for this board? Sure. Here it is: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Capabilities: [e0] Vendor Specific Information 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 Memory at 9020 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] Memory at 8000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] I/O ports at 2140 [size=8] Capabilities: [90] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 00:03.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 HECI Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11 Memory at 90325900 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [8c] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566DC Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 0001 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 218 Memory at 9030 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Memory at 90324000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] I/O ports at 20c0 [size=32] Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [d0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable+ 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 I/O ports at 20a0 [size=32] 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB UHCI #5 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20 I/O ports at 2080 [size=32] 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 EHCI #2 (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 514d Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at 90325400 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] Debug port 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 2503 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 23 Memory at 9032 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [70] Express Unknown type IRQ 0 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 Memory behind bridge: 9040-904f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 1000-1fff Memory behind bridge: 9010-901f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0 Memory behind bridge: 9050-905f Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10 : Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for your PATA stuff (my board is the same). Try the latest Marvell driver, it seems to drive my machine ok. For older kernels, I think you can pass 'all-generic-ide' on the boot line to get the old IDE layer to drive the device. Oh dear, would you believe I totally missed this entry in a dozen runs though the output yesterday? A fresh pair of eyes always helps. This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell. Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just booted has this set to y (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel was 2.6.22-rc2. Regards jonathan -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just booted has this set to y (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel was 2.6.22-rc2. Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip so you might need to do some debugging and provide more detail. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just booted has this set to y (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel was 2.6.22-rc2. Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip so you might need to do some debugging and provide more detail. I got someone to go into the BIOS setup (I am debugging this remotely) and check the IDE/ATA related options. The two relevant options were set as follows: ATA/IDE Mode: Native[ Choices: Legacy, Native ] Configure SATA as: IDE [ Choices: IDE, RAID, AHCI ] I had them change the Configure SATA as setting from IDE to AHCI and then reboot into 2.6.22-rc2. At this point things appear to be much happier: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Probing IDE interface ide0... Probing IDE interface ide1... : ahci :00:1f.2: version 2.1 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 6 ports 3 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode ahci :00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq led clo pio slum part PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ahci : scsi5 : ahci ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf882a100 ctl 0x bmdma 0x irq 0 : ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf882a380 ctl 0x bmdma 0x irq 0 ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD2500AAJS-00RYA0, 12.01B01, max UDMA/133 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 488397168, hpa_sectors = 488397168 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) : ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off : sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 16 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :02:00.0 to 64 scsi6 : pata_marvell scsi7 : pata_marvell ata7: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00011018 ctl 0x00011026 bmdma 0x00011000 irq 0 ata8: DUMMY BAR5:00:00 01:7F 02:22 03:CA 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 0A:00 0B:00 0C:01 0D:00 0E:00 0F:00 ata7.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66 ata7.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable ata7.00: configured for UDMA/33 scsi 6:0:0:0: CD-ROMSONY DVD RW DRU-830A SS25 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 40x/40x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 sr 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 sr 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5 Therefore it seems that for whatever reason, the marvell_pata driver will only find the Marvell PATA IDE controller if the *SATA* mode in the BIOS is set to AHCI. It's somewhat counter-intuitive, but since AHCI is the correct setting for SATA performance reasons it's probably not such a bad thing. So, thanks for all the suggestions; the problem appears solved. Regards jonathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
