Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
Alan Cox wrote: > > > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically > > > enable it at run time. > > > > I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... > > Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! > > > > Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. > > Its true in 2.2 At what point in 2.2 did it become true? I rarely used 2.2, I went from 2.1 to 2.3 and I don't recall having to ever enable it. Once it was compiled in it was on. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
> > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically > > enable it at run time. > > I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... > Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! > > Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. Its true in 2.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. Its true in 2.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
Alan Cox wrote: AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. Its true in 2.2 At what point in 2.2 did it become true? I rarely used 2.2, I went from 2.1 to 2.3 and I don't recall having to ever enable it. Once it was compiled in it was on. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
Jonathan Earle wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: > > > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically > > > enable it at run time. > > > > I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... > > Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it > > anyway, thanks! > > > > Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. > > I'd suggest leaving those lines in; I've never had it enabled by default. > I've run Debian and Redhat systems, and both had to have the option > specifically turned ON via startup script - simply compiling it into a > kernel did not enable it. > > Jon I suggest compiling it in and booting with init=/bin/bash, mounting /proc and checking the value. It is enabled by default. A few distributions have a boot script that enables or disables it based on the sysconfig. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: > > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically > > enable it at run time. > > I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... > Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it > anyway, thanks! > > Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. I'd suggest leaving those lines in; I've never had it enabled by default. I've run Debian and Redhat systems, and both had to have the option specifically turned ON via startup script - simply compiling it into a kernel did not enable it. Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. I'd suggest leaving those lines in; I've never had it enabled by default. I've run Debian and Redhat systems, and both had to have the option specifically turned ON via startup script - simply compiling it into a kernel did not enable it. Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
Jonathan Earle wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. I'd suggest leaving those lines in; I've never had it enabled by default. I've run Debian and Redhat systems, and both had to have the option specifically turned ON via startup script - simply compiling it into a kernel did not enable it. Jon I suggest compiling it in and booting with init=/bin/bash, mounting /proc and checking the value. It is enabled by default. A few distributions have a boot script that enables or disables it based on the sysconfig. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically > enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. /jmd --- Documentation/sysrq.txt~Sun Jan 28 14:41:44 2001 +++ Documentation/sysrq.txt Sun Jan 28 14:41:52 2001 @@ -15,9 +15,6 @@ echo "0" > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq -Note that previous versions disabled sysrq by default, and you were required -to specifically enable it at run-time. That is not the case any longer. - * How do I use the magic SysRq key? On x86 - You press the key combo 'ALT-SysRq-'. Note - Some - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
"Jeremy M. Dolan" wrote: > +Note that previous versions disabled sysrq by default, and you were required > +to specifically enable it at run-time. That is not the case any longer. AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. There are certain distributions which disabled it by default but this is distribution specific, not by way of the kernel. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
"Jeremy M. Dolan" wrote: +Note that previous versions disabled sysrq by default, and you were required +to specifically enable it at run-time. That is not the case any longer. AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. There are certain distributions which disabled it by default but this is distribution specific, not by way of the kernel. -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] doc update/fixes for sysrq.txt
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote: AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically enable it at run time. I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in... Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it anyway, thanks! Here's a patch against the first that simply removes the lines. /jmd --- Documentation/sysrq.txt~Sun Jan 28 14:41:44 2001 +++ Documentation/sysrq.txt Sun Jan 28 14:41:52 2001 @@ -15,9 +15,6 @@ echo "0" /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq -Note that previous versions disabled sysrq by default, and you were required -to specifically enable it at run-time. That is not the case any longer. - * How do I use the magic SysRq key? On x86 - You press the key combo 'ALT-SysRq-command key'. Note - Some - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
