RE: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

2018-02-13 Thread Brown, Aaron F 
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:48 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T 
> Cc: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Christophe
> JAILLET 
> Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
> 
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is
> 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.
> 
> See 'struct hwtstamp_config' in 'include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h'
> 
> This fixes a warning reported by smatch:
>igb_xmit_frame_ring() warn: bit shifter 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' used for
> logical '&'
> 
> Fixes: 26bd4e2db06be ("igb: protect TX timestamping from API misuse")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Tested-by: Aaron Brown

RE: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

2018-02-13 Thread Brown, Aaron F 
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:48 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T 
> Cc: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Christophe
> JAILLET 
> Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
> 
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is
> 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.
> 
> See 'struct hwtstamp_config' in 'include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h'
> 
> This fixes a warning reported by smatch:
>igb_xmit_frame_ring() warn: bit shifter 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' used for
> logical '&'
> 
> Fixes: 26bd4e2db06be ("igb: protect TX timestamping from API misuse")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Tested-by: Aaron Brown

Re: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

2018-02-06 Thread Richard Cochran 
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.

Nice catch, and I am going to introduce more tx_type values soon.

Thanks,
Richard

Re: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

2018-02-06 Thread Richard Cochran 
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.

Nice catch, and I am going to introduce more tx_type values soon.

Thanks,
Richard