RE: [PATCH 15/21] mwifiex: slight optimization of addr compare
Hi Ding, > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > index ada809f..a180298 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ mwifiex_11n_get_rx_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private > *priv, int tid, u8 *ta) > > spin_lock_irqsave(>rx_reorder_tbl_lock, flags); > list_for_each_entry(tbl, >rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) { > - if (!memcmp(tbl->ta, ta, ETH_ALEN) && tbl->tid == tid) { > + if (ether_addr_equal_unaligned(tbl->ta, ta) && tbl->tid == tid) > { checkpatch.pl found several warnings in this patch. WARNING: line over 80 characters Could you please fix these warnings by splitting the function arguments into multiple lines? Thanks, Bing
RE: [PATCH 15/21] mwifiex: slight optimization of addr compare
Hi Ding, diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c index ada809f..a180298 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ mwifiex_11n_get_rx_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private *priv, int tid, u8 *ta) spin_lock_irqsave(priv-rx_reorder_tbl_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(tbl, priv-rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) { - if (!memcmp(tbl-ta, ta, ETH_ALEN) tbl-tid == tid) { + if (ether_addr_equal_unaligned(tbl-ta, ta) tbl-tid == tid) { checkpatch.pl found several warnings in this patch. WARNING: line over 80 characters Could you please fix these warnings by splitting the function arguments into multiple lines? Thanks, Bing