RE: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Kan Liang> > > > Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of > > events is more than available counters. > > > > The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common > overhead > > type. > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > @@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry { > > */ > > enum perf_record_overhead_type { > > PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0, > > + PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0, > > '0' already had a name ?! PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD is only used to indicate the start of core overhead type. I will use comment line to replace PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD. Thanks, Kan
RE: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Kan Liang > > > > Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of > > events is more than available counters. > > > > The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common > overhead > > type. > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > > @@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry { > > */ > > enum perf_record_overhead_type { > > PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0, > > + PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0, > > '0' already had a name ?! PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD is only used to indicate the start of core overhead type. I will use comment line to replace PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD. Thanks, Kan
Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > From: Kan Liang> > Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of > events is more than available counters. > > The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common overhead > type. > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry { > */ > enum perf_record_overhead_type { > PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0, > + PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0, '0' already had a name ?! > > PERF_PMU_OVERHEAD= 20, > PERF_PMU_SAMPLE_OVERHEAD = 20, Same here I suppose, why are there two with the same name? > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index 306bc92..025a19d 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, > if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu) > cpuctx->exclusive = 0; > > + if (log_overhead && cpuctx->mux_overhead.nr) > + perf_log_overhead(event, PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD, > >mux_overhead); > + This isn't mentioned in the Changelog. Why is it here? > perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu); > } >
Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > From: Kan Liang > > Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of > events is more than available counters. > > The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common overhead > type. > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry { > */ > enum perf_record_overhead_type { > PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0, > + PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0, '0' already had a name ?! > > PERF_PMU_OVERHEAD= 20, > PERF_PMU_SAMPLE_OVERHEAD = 20, Same here I suppose, why are there two with the same name? > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index 306bc92..025a19d 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, > if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu) > cpuctx->exclusive = 0; > > + if (log_overhead && cpuctx->mux_overhead.nr) > + perf_log_overhead(event, PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD, > >mux_overhead); > + This isn't mentioned in the Changelog. Why is it here? > perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu); > } >