Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-08 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas 
Hello Amitkumar,

On 09/08/2016 11:55 AM, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> 
>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas [mailto:jav...@osg.samsung.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:43 PM
>> To: Kalle Valo
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Amitkumar Karwar;
>> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant
>> Sarmukadam; Arend van Spriel
>> Subject: Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in
>> mwifiex_sdio_of()
>>
>> Hello Kalle,
>>
>> On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error
>>>> message is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the
>> caller function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
>>>
>>> What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
>>>
>>> (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the
>>> signature.)
>>>
>>
>> My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the
>> question raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW,
>> the patch is OK and should be picked.
>>
>> I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him
>> though.
>>
> 
> This error doesn't affect actual wifi functionality. Only thing is wakeup on 
> interrupt when system is in suspended state won't work.
> I think, we can make below change. 
> 
> --
> @@ -122,9 +122,11 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev, 
> struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
>IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
>"wifi_wake", cfg);
>if (ret) {
> -dev_err(dev,
> +dev_dbg(dev,
>  "Failed to request irq_wifi %d (%d)\n",
>  cfg->irq_wifi, ret);
> +card->plt_wake_cfg = NULL;
> +return 0;
>  }

I'm OK with that change. Feel free too add my Reviewed-by if you post it.

> disable_irq(cfg->irq_wifi);
> }
> -
> 
> Regards,
> Amitkumar
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-08 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas 
Hello Amitkumar,

On 09/08/2016 11:55 AM, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> 
>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas [mailto:jav...@osg.samsung.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:43 PM
>> To: Kalle Valo
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Amitkumar Karwar;
>> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant
>> Sarmukadam; Arend van Spriel
>> Subject: Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in
>> mwifiex_sdio_of()
>>
>> Hello Kalle,
>>
>> On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
>>>> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error
>>>> message is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the
>> caller function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
>>>
>>> What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
>>>
>>> (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the
>>> signature.)
>>>
>>
>> My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the
>> question raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW,
>> the patch is OK and should be picked.
>>
>> I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him
>> though.
>>
> 
> This error doesn't affect actual wifi functionality. Only thing is wakeup on 
> interrupt when system is in suspended state won't work.
> I think, we can make below change. 
> 
> --
> @@ -122,9 +122,11 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev, 
> struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
>IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
>"wifi_wake", cfg);
>if (ret) {
> -dev_err(dev,
> +dev_dbg(dev,
>  "Failed to request irq_wifi %d (%d)\n",
>  cfg->irq_wifi, ret);
> +card->plt_wake_cfg = NULL;
> +return 0;
>  }

I'm OK with that change. Feel free too add my Reviewed-by if you post it.

> disable_irq(cfg->irq_wifi);
> }
> -
> 
> Regards,
> Amitkumar
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

RE: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-08 Thread Amitkumar Karwar 
Hi Javier,

> From: Javier Martinez Canillas [mailto:jav...@osg.samsung.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:43 PM
> To: Kalle Valo
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Amitkumar Karwar;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant
> Sarmukadam; Arend van Spriel
> Subject: Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in
> mwifiex_sdio_of()
> 
> Hello Kalle,
> 
> On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> >> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error
> >> message is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the
> caller function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
> >
> > What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
> >
> > (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the
> > signature.)
> >
> 
> My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the
> question raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW,
> the patch is OK and should be picked.
> 
> I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him
> though.
> 

This error doesn't affect actual wifi functionality. Only thing is wakeup on 
interrupt when system is in suspended state won't work.
I think, we can make below change. 

--
@@ -122,9 +122,11 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev, 
struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
   IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
   "wifi_wake", cfg);
   if (ret) {
-dev_err(dev,
+dev_dbg(dev,
 "Failed to request irq_wifi %d (%d)\n",
 cfg->irq_wifi, ret);
+card->plt_wake_cfg = NULL;
+return 0;
 }
disable_irq(cfg->irq_wifi);
}
-

Regards,
Amitkumar

RE: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-08 Thread Amitkumar Karwar 
Hi Javier,

> From: Javier Martinez Canillas [mailto:jav...@osg.samsung.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:43 PM
> To: Kalle Valo
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Amitkumar Karwar;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; Nishant
> Sarmukadam; Arend van Spriel
> Subject: Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in
> mwifiex_sdio_of()
> 
> Hello Kalle,
> 
> On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
> >> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error
> >> message is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the
> caller function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> >
> > What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
> >
> > (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the
> > signature.)
> >
> 
> My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the
> question raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW,
> the patch is OK and should be picked.
> 
> I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him
> though.
> 

This error doesn't affect actual wifi functionality. Only thing is wakeup on 
interrupt when system is in suspended state won't work.
I think, we can make below change. 

--
@@ -122,9 +122,11 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev, 
struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
   IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW,
   "wifi_wake", cfg);
   if (ret) {
-dev_err(dev,
+dev_dbg(dev,
 "Failed to request irq_wifi %d (%d)\n",
 cfg->irq_wifi, ret);
+card->plt_wake_cfg = NULL;
+return 0;
 }
disable_irq(cfg->irq_wifi);
}
-

Regards,
Amitkumar

Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-06 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas 
Hello Kalle,

On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
>> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error message
>> is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the caller function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> 
> What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
> 
> (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the signature.)
> 

My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the question
raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW, the patch is
OK and should be picked.

I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him though.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-06 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas 
Hello Kalle,

On 09/03/2016 12:35 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
>> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error message
>> is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the caller function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> 
> What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?
> 
> (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the signature.)
> 

My understanding is that Arend agrees with the patch and that the question
raised was caused by looking at an older kernel version. IOW, the patch is
OK and should be picked.

I'm adding Arend to cc, so can comment in case I misunderstood him though.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-03 Thread Kalle Valo 
Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error message
> is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the caller function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 

What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?

(The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the signature.)

-- 
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9288169/

Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of()

2016-09-03 Thread Kalle Valo 
Javier Martinez Canillas  wrote:
> If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error message
> is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the caller function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 

What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it?

(The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the signature.)

-- 
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9288169/