Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alan Cox wrote: I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report "irq 0"? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 < Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. I've seen the patch that eventually became 22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing from Tejun on the subject. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ > >>> storm > >> Why does the driver report "irq 0"? > >> > >> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 < > >> > >> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 > > > > Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ > > values wrongly ? > > AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it > remains broken... 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Alan Cox wrote: I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report "irq 0"? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 < Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
> > I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ > > storm > > Why does the driver report "irq 0"? > > ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 < > > Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On 29/06/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SATA/PATA > > Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 > Submitter : Rodney Gordon II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I removed this bug from the kr list. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On 06/29/2007 12:59 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> SATA/PATA >> >> Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 >> Submitter : Rodney Gordon II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Status : unknown > > Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I've > been running heavy testing with 2.6.22rc6 and IT8212 and its working > reliably for the "dumb" mode in question. > > The hardware mode needs a fix Tejun has queued somewhere (probably in > Jeff's vast backlog) and then works too. > > I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ > storm Why does the driver report "irq 0"? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 < Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Hello. Michal Piotrowski wrote: IDE Subject: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/29/121 Submitter : David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Probing IDE interface ide0... hda: probing with STATUS(0xa0) instead of ALTSTATUS(0x58) Ugh, 0xa0 is the device/head register's value, not the status register's! I'd suppose that I/O space was borken in some funny way, however, it would be hard top expect form x86 which should be prone to endiannes blues... MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
> SATA/PATA > > Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 > Submitter : Rodney Gordon II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I've been running heavy testing with 2.6.22rc6 and IT8212 and its working reliably for the "dumb" mode in question. The hardware mode needs a fix Tejun has queued somewhere (probably in Jeff's vast backlog) and then works too. I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
SATA/PATA Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 Submitter : Rodney Gordon II [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I've been running heavy testing with 2.6.22rc6 and IT8212 and its working reliably for the dumb mode in question. The hardware mode needs a fix Tejun has queued somewhere (probably in Jeff's vast backlog) and then works too. I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Hello. Michal Piotrowski wrote: IDE Subject: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/29/121 Submitter : David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Probing IDE interface ide0... hda: probing with STATUS(0xa0) instead of ALTSTATUS(0x58) Ugh, 0xa0 is the device/head register's value, not the status register's! I'd suppose that I/O space was borken in some funny way, however, it would be hard top expect form x86 which should be prone to endiannes blues... MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On 06/29/2007 12:59 PM, Alan Cox wrote: SATA/PATA Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 Submitter : Rodney Gordon II [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I've been running heavy testing with 2.6.22rc6 and IT8212 and its working reliably for the dumb mode in question. The hardware mode needs a fix Tejun has queued somewhere (probably in Jeff's vast backlog) and then works too. I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report irq 0? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd blah ctl blah bmdma blah irq 0 Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On 29/06/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SATA/PATA Subject: libata IT821X driver still fails! Hard-freezes system References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/82 Submitter : Rodney Gordon II [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Not a regression as it seems this user's box has always been broken. I removed this bug from the kr list. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report irq 0? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd blah ctl blah bmdma blah irq 0 Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan Cox wrote: I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report irq 0? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd blah ctl blah bmdma blah irq 0 Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Alan Cox wrote: I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report irq 0? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd blah ctl blah bmdma blah irq 0 Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2
Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan Cox wrote: I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm Why does the driver report irq 0? ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd blah ctl blah bmdma blah irq 0 Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. I've seen the patch that eventually became 22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing from Tejun on the subject. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
