Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:49:43 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was > > demand... > > I'd certainly like to see/use it. http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/arm-cross.tar.bz2 works. It's linked on FC5 x86, runs OK on FC6 and FC3 or thereabouts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:36:49 + Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 > > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ > > > > Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a > > number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation > > with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually > > work. Good luck ;) > > FWIW, OpenEmbedded (http://www.openembedded.org/) is a very capable > toolchain builder amongst other things. I built an ARM toolchain for > Andrew a while back with it. I'm personally not sure of its support > outside ARM/i386 since I don't have hardware to test any other output > but others use it for a variety of targets and new ones are simple to > add due to its design. > > I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was > demand... I'd certainly like to see/use it. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ > > Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a > number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation > with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually > work. Good luck ;) FWIW, OpenEmbedded (http://www.openembedded.org/) is a very capable toolchain builder amongst other things. I built an ARM toolchain for Andrew a while back with it. I'm personally not sure of its support outside ARM/i386 since I don't have hardware to test any other output but others use it for a variety of targets and new ones are simple to add due to its design. I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was demand... Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) FWIW, OpenEmbedded (http://www.openembedded.org/) is a very capable toolchain builder amongst other things. I built an ARM toolchain for Andrew a while back with it. I'm personally not sure of its support outside ARM/i386 since I don't have hardware to test any other output but others use it for a variety of targets and new ones are simple to add due to its design. I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was demand... Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:36:49 + Richard Purdie wrote: On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) FWIW, OpenEmbedded (http://www.openembedded.org/) is a very capable toolchain builder amongst other things. I built an ARM toolchain for Andrew a while back with it. I'm personally not sure of its support outside ARM/i386 since I don't have hardware to test any other output but others use it for a variety of targets and new ones are simple to add due to its design. I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was demand... I'd certainly like to see/use it. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:49:43 -0800 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was demand... I'd certainly like to see/use it. http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/arm-cross.tar.bz2 works. It's linked on FC5 x86, runs OK on FC6 and FC3 or thereabouts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:09:11 +0100 > Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 >>> Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ >>> Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a >>> number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation >>> with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually >>> work. Good luck ;) >>> >>> There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published >>> cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that >>> clever person was? >> Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? >> >>http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ >> > > No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with > scary-looking results. > > Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of > cross-compiler binaries? Probably not. I could publish a qemu i386 image with all cross compilers though. But some are not build from source but are obtained from more or less obscure sources (m32r, sh64). Currently this CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h "2.6.20-rc6cat:include/config/kernel.release:Nosuchfileordirectory" exceeds 64 characters make[1]: *** [include/linux/utsrelease.h] Error 1 make: *** [_all] Error 2 bug, which I reported weeks ago, makes the result invalid for most archs. But as I get nearly zero feedback about the results and I've lots of other obligations currently, my motivation to work on that is pretty much nil. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
> Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? > >http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ > No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with scary-looking results. Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of cross-compiler binaries? That's going to be tricky, even if they're statically linked, what architecture do you want them for, etc? Plus some things seem to just refuse to statically link now (anything with resolver code, though maybe gcc doesn't care). If we can get the crosstool configs to build all that stuff ourselves, for any platform, would be more flexible, IMHO. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:09:11 +0100 Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 > > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ > > > > Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a > > number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation > > with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually > > work. Good luck ;) > > > > There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published > > cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that > > clever person was? > > Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? > >http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ > No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with scary-looking results. Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of cross-compiler binaries? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ > > Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a > number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation > with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually > work. Good luck ;) > > There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published > cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that > clever person was? Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm giving up. Someone should publish a suite of cross-compilers for us > so stuff like this doesn't need to happen. Hi Andrew, I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ I will let you know more when my cross compiler chain is set up. Mathieu -- OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'm giving up. Someone should publish a suite of cross-compilers for us so stuff like this doesn't need to happen. Hi Andrew, I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ I will let you know more when my cross compiler chain is set up. Mathieu -- OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was? Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:09:11 +0100 Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was? Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with scary-looking results. Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of cross-compiler binaries? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with scary-looking results. Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of cross-compiler binaries? That's going to be tricky, even if they're statically linked, what architecture do you want them for, etc? Plus some things seem to just refuse to statically link now (anything with resolver code, though maybe gcc doesn't care). If we can get the crosstool configs to build all that stuff ourselves, for any platform, would be more flexible, IMHO. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:09:11 +0100 Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:05:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was? Wasn't it buildroot from Erik Andersen ? http://buildroot.uclibc.org/ No, it was http://l4x.org/k/ It still appears to be operating, with scary-looking results. Jan, is there any way in which you can help us publish a full suite of cross-compiler binaries? Probably not. I could publish a qemu i386 image with all cross compilers though. But some are not build from source but are obtained from more or less obscure sources (m32r, sh64). Currently this CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h 2.6.20-rc6cat:include/config/kernel.release:Nosuchfileordirectory exceeds 64 characters make[1]: *** [include/linux/utsrelease.h] Error 1 make: *** [_all] Error 2 bug, which I reported weeks ago, makes the result invalid for most archs. But as I get nearly zero feedback about the results and I've lots of other obligations currently, my motivation to work on that is pretty much nil. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
