Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-16 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:07:14 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>
>   
>> Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
>>
>> The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
>> Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
>>
>> This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
>> matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
>>
>> In order to do this, we:
>>1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
>>2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
>>3. update vmi accordingly
>>
>> One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
>> kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
>> binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
>> function won't work in this case.
>> 
>
> include/asm/paravirt.h: In function 'paravirt_sched_clock':
> include/asm/paravirt.h:281: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'PVOP_CALL0'
> include/asm/paravirt.h:281: error: expected expression before 'unsigned'
>   

Sorry, I didn't intend for it to be picked up; it depends on stuff
earlier in the patch series.  I just wanted to check with the VMI folks
that it works for them in principle.

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:07:14 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
> 
> The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
> Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
> 
> This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
> matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
> 
> In order to do this, we:
>1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
>2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
>3. update vmi accordingly
> 
> One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
> kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
> binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
> function won't work in this case.

include/asm/paravirt.h: In function 'paravirt_sched_clock':
include/asm/paravirt.h:281: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'PVOP_CALL0'
include/asm/paravirt.h:281: error: expected expression before 'unsigned'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:07:14 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
 
 The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
 Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
 
 This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
 matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
 
 In order to do this, we:
1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
3. update vmi accordingly
 
 One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
 kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
 binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
 function won't work in this case.

include/asm/paravirt.h: In function 'paravirt_sched_clock':
include/asm/paravirt.h:281: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'PVOP_CALL0'
include/asm/paravirt.h:281: error: expected expression before 'unsigned'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-16 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:07:14 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

   
 Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op

 The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
 Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.

 This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
 matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.

 In order to do this, we:
1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
3. update vmi accordingly

 One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
 kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
 binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
 function won't work in this case.
 

 include/asm/paravirt.h: In function 'paravirt_sched_clock':
 include/asm/paravirt.h:281: warning: implicit declaration of function 
 'PVOP_CALL0'
 include/asm/paravirt.h:281: error: expected expression before 'unsigned'
   

Sorry, I didn't intend for it to be picked up; it depends on stuff
earlier in the patch series.  I just wanted to check with the VMI folks
that it works for them in principle.

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-14 Thread Zachary Amsden

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op

The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.

This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.

In order to do this, we:
   1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
   2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
   3. update vmi accordingly

One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
function won't work in this case.
  


Acked-by: Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

2007-03-14 Thread Zachary Amsden

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op

The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.

This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.

In order to do this, we:
   1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
   2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
   3. update vmi accordingly

One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
function won't work in this case.
  


Acked-by: Zachary Amsden [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/