Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Thomas Garnier
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Morton
 wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:58:48 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
>> >> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
>> >> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
>> >
>> > Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?
>>
>> It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
>> but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
>> machines (every few hours of running tests).
>
> So should the fix be backported into -stable kernels?
>

I think it should, yes.

>> >
>> >> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
>> >> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
>> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
>> >
>> > This should have been signed off by yourself.
>> >
>> > I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
>> > indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
>> > Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?
>
> I have the patch as
>
> From: John Sperbeck 
> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier 
>
> Is that correct?  Is John the primary author?

That's correct.

-- 
Thomas


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Thomas Garnier
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Morton
 wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:58:48 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
>> >> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
>> >> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
>> >
>> > Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?
>>
>> It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
>> but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
>> machines (every few hours of running tests).
>
> So should the fix be backported into -stable kernels?
>

I think it should, yes.

>> >
>> >> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
>> >> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
>> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
>> >
>> > This should have been signed off by yourself.
>> >
>> > I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
>> > indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
>> > Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?
>
> I have the patch as
>
> From: John Sperbeck 
> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier 
>
> Is that correct?  Is John the primary author?

That's correct.

-- 
Thomas


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:58:48 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  
> wrote:
> > On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
> >> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
> >> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
> >
> > Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?
> 
> It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
> but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
> machines (every few hours of running tests).

So should the fix be backported into -stable kernels?

> >
> >> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
> >> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
> >
> > This should have been signed off by yourself.
> >
> > I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
> > indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
> > Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
> >
> 
> Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?

I have the patch as

From: John Sperbeck 
Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier 

Is that correct?  Is John the primary author?


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:58:48 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  
> wrote:
> > On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
> >> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
> >> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
> >
> > Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?
> 
> It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
> but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
> machines (every few hours of running tests).

So should the fix be backported into -stable kernels?

> >
> >> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
> >> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
> >
> > This should have been signed off by yourself.
> >
> > I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
> > indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
> > Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
> >
> 
> Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?

I have the patch as

From: John Sperbeck 
Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier 

Is that correct?  Is John the primary author?


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Thomas Garnier
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
>> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
>> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
>
> Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?

It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
machines (every few hours of running tests).

>
>> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
>> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
>
> This should have been signed off by yourself.
>
> I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
> indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
> Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
>

Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?

-- 
Thomas


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-06 Thread Thomas Garnier
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton  wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
>> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
>> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.
>
> Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?

It will result in odd behaviours and crashes. It should be uncommon
but it depends on the machines. We saw it happening more often on some
machines (every few hours of running tests).

>
>> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
>> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 
>
> This should have been signed off by yourself.
>
> I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
> indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog.
> Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).
>

Sorry, I though the sign-off was enough. Do you want me to send a v2?

-- 
Thomas


Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:

> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.

Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?

> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 

This should have been signed off by yourself.

I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog. 
Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).



Re: [PATCH] Fix SLAB freelist randomization duplicate entries

2017-01-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:19:08 -0800 Thomas Garnier  wrote:

> This patch fixes a bug in the freelist randomization code. When a high
> random number is used, the freelist will contain duplicate entries. It
> will result in different allocations sharing the same chunk.

Important: what are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?

> Fixes: c7ce4f60ac19 ("mm: SLAB freelist randomization")
> Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier 

This should have been signed off by yourself.

I'm guessing that the author was in fact John?  If so, you should
indicate this by putting his From: line at the start of the changelog. 
Otherwise, authorship will default to the sender (ie, yourself).