Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Re-work SMC comms v1

2020-11-09 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Brad,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on hwmon/hwmon-next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.10-rc3 next-20201109]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Brad-Campbell/applesmc-Re-work-SMC-comms-v1/20201105-134944
base:   
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git 
hwmon-next
config: i386-randconfig-r022-20201109 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/db5e9737dcc2fec2ff3713bc346904d4b5ac5c0d
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
Brad-Campbell/applesmc-Re-work-SMC-comms-v1/20201105-134944
git checkout db5e9737dcc2fec2ff3713bc346904d4b5ac5c0d
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot 

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c: In function 'send_command':
>> drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c:214:5: warning: variable 'status' set but not used 
>> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 214 |  u8 status;
 | ^~

vim +/status +214 drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c

   206  
   207  /*
   208   * send_command - Write a command to the SMC. Callers must hold 
applesmc_lock.
   209   * If SMC is in undefined state, any new command write resets the state 
machine.
   210   */
   211  
   212  static int send_command(u8 cmd)
   213  {
 > 214  u8 status;
   215  
   216  if (wait_status(0,
   217  SMC_STATUS_IB_CLOSED)) {
   218  pr_warn("send_command SMC was busy\n");
   219  goto fail; }
   220  
   221  status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
   222  
   223  outb(cmd, APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
   224  if (!wait_status(SMC_STATUS_BUSY,
   225  SMC_STATUS_BUSY))
   226  return 0;
   227  fail:
   228  pr_warn("send_cmd(0x%02x, 0x%04x) fail\n", cmd, 
APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
   229  return -EIO;
   230  }
   231  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org


.config.gz
Description: application/gzip


Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Re-work SMC comms v1

2020-11-04 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:47:25PM +1100, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Commit fff2d0f701e6 ("hwmon: (applesmc) avoid overlong udelay()") introduced
> an issue whereby communication with the SMC became unreliable with write
> errors :
> 
> [  120.378614] applesmc: send_byte(0x00, 0x0300) fail: 0x40
> [  120.378621] applesmc: LKSB: write data fail
> [  120.512782] applesmc: send_byte(0x00, 0x0300) fail: 0x40
> [  120.512787] applesmc: LKSB: write data fail
> 
> The original code appeared to be timing sensitive and was not reliable with
> the timing changes in the aforementioned commit.
> 
> This patch re-factors the SMC communication to remove the timing 
> dependencies and restore function with the changes previously committed.
> 
> Reported-by: Andreas Kemnade 

Add

Fixes: fff2d0f701e6 ("hwmon: (applesmc) avoid overlong udelay()")

> Signed-off-by: Brad Campbell 
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> index a18887990f4a..22cc5122ce9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
>  
>  #define APPLESMC_MAX_DATA_LENGTH 32
>  
> +/* Apple SMC status bits from VirtualSMC */
> +#define SMC_STATUS_AWAITING_DATA  0x01  ///< Data waiting to be read
> +#define SMC_STATUS_IB_CLOSED  0x02  /// A write is pending / will ignore 
> input
> +#define SMC_STATUS_BUSY   0x04  ///< Busy in the middle of a command.
> +

Maybe consider using BIT() while at it.

/* Please use standard comments */

Also, what does the "<" mean ? Is that supposed to be negated 
(ie bit set means not busy) ? If so, that isn't a standard notation
that I am aware of. Maybe "not set if busy in the middle of a command"
would be better in this case.

>  /* wait up to 128 ms for a status change. */
>  #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT0x0010
>  #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT  0x0100
> @@ -151,65 +156,77 @@ static unsigned int key_at_index;
>  static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq;
>  
>  /*
> - * wait_read - Wait for a byte to appear on SMC port. Callers must
> - * hold applesmc_lock.
> + * Wait for specific status bits with a mask on the SMC
> + * Used before and after writes, and before reads
>   */
> -static int wait_read(void)
> +
> +static int wait_status(u8 val, u8 mask)
>  {
>   unsigned long end = jiffies + (APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT * HZ) / USEC_PER_SEC;
>   u8 status;
>   int us;
>  
>   for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> - usleep_range(us, us * 16);
>   status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
> - /* read: wait for smc to settle */
> - if (status & 0x01)
> + if ((status & mask) == val)
>   return 0;
>   /* timeout: give up */
>   if (time_after(jiffies, end))
>   break;
> - }
> -
> - pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status);
> + usleep_range(us, us * 16);
> + }
> + pr_warn("wait_status timeout: 0x%02x, 0x%02x, 0x%02x\n", status, val, 
> mask);
>   return -EIO;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * send_byte - Write to SMC port, retrying when necessary. Callers
> + * send_byte_data - Write to SMC data port. Callers
>   * must hold applesmc_lock.
> + * Parameter skip must be true on the last write of any
> + * command or it'll time out.
>   */
> -static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port)

I would suggest to keep send_byte() and change it to the following.

static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port)
{
return send_byte_data(cmd, port, false);
}

That would limit the number of changes needed later in the code
(it is never called with a hard 'true' as parameter).

> +
> +static int send_byte_data(u8 cmd, u16 port, bool skip)
>  {
> - u8 status;
> - int us;
> - unsigned long end = jiffies + (APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT * HZ) / USEC_PER_SEC;
> + u8 wstat = SMC_STATUS_BUSY;
>  
> + if (skip)
> + wstat = 0;

u8 wstat = skip ? 0 : SMC_STATUS_BUSY;

> + if (wait_status(SMC_STATUS_BUSY,
> + SMC_STATUS_BUSY | SMC_STATUS_IB_CLOSED))

This fits one line, and the error code
should really not be overwritten.

ret = wait_status(SMC_STATUS_BUSY, SMC_STATUS_BUSY | 
SMC_STATUS_IB_CLOSED);
if (ret)
return ret;

> + goto fail;
>   outb(cmd, port);
> - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> - usleep_range(us, us * 16);
> - status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
> - /* write: wait for smc to settle */
> - if (status & 0x02)
> - continue;
> - /* ready: cmd accepted, return */
> - if (status & 0x04)
> - return 0;
> - /* timeout: give up */
> - if (time_after(jiffies, end))
> - break;
> - /* busy: long wait and resend */
> - udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT);
> - outb(cmd, port);
> - }
> -
> -