Re: [PATCH] arm:pm: Use kmemdup to replace duplicating its implementation

2018-08-13 Thread zhong jiang
On 2018/8/13 20:28, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi zhong jiang,
>
> On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
>> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> index 6247157..6eefff8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>>  void *iram_swap_area;
>>  
>>  /* Allocate some space for temporary IRAM storage */
>> -iram_swap_area = kmalloc(lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +iram_swap_area = kmemdup((void *)TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
>> +lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> there is a minor coding style issue, which is reported by checkpatch:
>
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #53: FILE: arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c:90:
>
> Other than that the change is valid, I'll fix the indentation issue
> myself and apply the change for v4.19.
 Thank you for doing this. I will notice that for next time.

 Sincerely,
 zhong jiang
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir
>
>>  if (!iram_swap_area) {
>>  printk(KERN_ERR
>> "PM Suspend: cannot allocate memory to save portion "
>> @@ -94,10 +95,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Backup a small area of IRAM used for the suspend code */
>> -memcpy(iram_swap_area, (void *) TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
>> -lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz);
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Copy code to suspend system into IRAM. The suspend code
>>   * needs to run from IRAM as DRAM may no longer be available
>>
>
> .
>




Re: [PATCH] arm:pm: Use kmemdup to replace duplicating its implementation

2018-08-13 Thread zhong jiang
On 2018/8/13 20:28, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi zhong jiang,
>
> On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
>> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> index 6247157..6eefff8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
>> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>>  void *iram_swap_area;
>>  
>>  /* Allocate some space for temporary IRAM storage */
>> -iram_swap_area = kmalloc(lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +iram_swap_area = kmemdup((void *)TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
>> +lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> there is a minor coding style issue, which is reported by checkpatch:
>
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #53: FILE: arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c:90:
>
> Other than that the change is valid, I'll fix the indentation issue
> myself and apply the change for v4.19.
 Thank you for doing this. I will notice that for next time.

 Sincerely,
 zhong jiang
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir
>
>>  if (!iram_swap_area) {
>>  printk(KERN_ERR
>> "PM Suspend: cannot allocate memory to save portion "
>> @@ -94,10 +95,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Backup a small area of IRAM used for the suspend code */
>> -memcpy(iram_swap_area, (void *) TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
>> -lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz);
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Copy code to suspend system into IRAM. The suspend code
>>   * needs to run from IRAM as DRAM may no longer be available
>>
>
> .
>




Re: [PATCH] arm:pm: Use kmemdup to replace duplicating its implementation

2018-08-13 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi zhong jiang,

On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> index 6247157..6eefff8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>   void *iram_swap_area;
>  
>   /* Allocate some space for temporary IRAM storage */
> - iram_swap_area = kmalloc(lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + iram_swap_area = kmemdup((void *)TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
> + lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);

there is a minor coding style issue, which is reported by checkpatch:

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#53: FILE: arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c:90:

Other than that the change is valid, I'll fix the indentation issue
myself and apply the change for v4.19.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

>   if (!iram_swap_area) {
>   printk(KERN_ERR
>  "PM Suspend: cannot allocate memory to save portion "
> @@ -94,10 +95,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>   }
>  
> - /* Backup a small area of IRAM used for the suspend code */
> - memcpy(iram_swap_area, (void *) TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
> - lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz);
> -
>   /*
>* Copy code to suspend system into IRAM. The suspend code
>* needs to run from IRAM as DRAM may no longer be available
> 



Re: [PATCH] arm:pm: Use kmemdup to replace duplicating its implementation

2018-08-13 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi zhong jiang,

On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> index 6247157..6eefff8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>   void *iram_swap_area;
>  
>   /* Allocate some space for temporary IRAM storage */
> - iram_swap_area = kmalloc(lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + iram_swap_area = kmemdup((void *)TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
> + lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz, GFP_KERNEL);

there is a minor coding style issue, which is reported by checkpatch:

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#53: FILE: arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c:90:

Other than that the change is valid, I'll fix the indentation issue
myself and apply the change for v4.19.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

>   if (!iram_swap_area) {
>   printk(KERN_ERR
>  "PM Suspend: cannot allocate memory to save portion "
> @@ -94,10 +95,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>   }
>  
> - /* Backup a small area of IRAM used for the suspend code */
> - memcpy(iram_swap_area, (void *) TEMP_IRAM_AREA,
> - lpc32xx_sys_suspend_sz);
> -
>   /*
>* Copy code to suspend system into IRAM. The suspend code
>* needs to run from IRAM as DRAM may no longer be available
>