Re: [PATCH] sched: fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period

2014-05-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Ben Segall wrote:
> @@ -3783,7 +3787,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused 
> unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
>* clock_task is not advancing so we just need to make sure
>* there's some valid quota amount
>*/
> - cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = cfs_b->quota;
> + cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1;
>   if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
>   unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>   }
> 

That ^, causes:

kernel/sched/fair.c: In function ‘unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs’:
kernel/sched/fair.c:3782:25: warning: unused variable ‘cfs_b’ 
[-Wunused-variable]

Stuck this on:

---
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3779,8 +3779,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_of
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
 
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
-   struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
-
if (!cfs_rq->runtime_enabled)
continue;
 


pgpRBLZHHpgJl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH] sched: fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period

2014-05-21 Thread Roman Gushchin

I tested this patch together with my previous patch 
("sched: tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() causes rq->lock deadlock"),
and can confirm, that all lockups are gone away.

Tested-by: Roman Gushchin 

At Mon, 19 May 2014 15:49:45 -0700,
Ben Segall wrote:
> 
> sched_cfs_period_timer read cfs_b->period without locks before calling
> do_sched_cfs_period_timer, and similarly unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs
> would read cfs_b->period without the right lock. Thus a simultaneous
> change of bandwidth could cause corruption on any platform where ktime_t
> or u64 writes/reads are not atomic.
> 
> Extend cfs_b->lock from do_sched_cfs_period_timer to include the read of
> cfs_b->period to solve that issue; unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs can just
> use 1 rather than the exact quota, much like distribute_cfs_runtime
> does.
> 
> There is also an unlocked read of cfs_b->runtime_expires, but a race
> there would only delay runtime expiry by a tick. Still, the comparison
> should just be != anyway, which clarifies even that problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Segall 
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c |   38 +-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c9617b7..60eddde 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3224,10 +3224,12 @@ static void expire_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq 
> *cfs_rq)
>* has not truly expired.
>*
>* Fortunately we can check determine whether this the case by checking
> -  * whether the global deadline has advanced.
> +  * whether the global deadline has advanced. It is valid to compare
> +  * cfs_b->runtime_expires without any locks since we only care about
> +  * exact equality, so a partial write will still work.
>*/
>  
> - if ((s64)(cfs_rq->runtime_expires - cfs_b->runtime_expires) >= 0) {
> + if (cfs_rq->runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires) {
>   /* extend local deadline, drift is bounded above by 2 ticks */
>   cfs_rq->runtime_expires += TICK_NSEC;
>   } else {
> @@ -3456,21 +3458,21 @@ next:
>  static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int 
> overrun)
>  {
>   u64 runtime, runtime_expires;
> - int idle = 1, throttled;
> + int throttled;
>  
> - raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
>   /* no need to continue the timer with no bandwidth constraint */
>   if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + goto out_deactivate;
>  
>   throttled = !list_empty(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
> - /* idle depends on !throttled (for the case of a large deficit) */
> - idle = cfs_b->idle && !throttled;
>   cfs_b->nr_periods += overrun;
>  
> - /* if we're going inactive then everything else can be deferred */
> - if (idle)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + /*
> +  * idle depends on !throttled (for the case of a large deficit), and if
> +  * we're going inactive then everything else can be deferred
> +  */
> + if (cfs_b->idle && !throttled)
> + goto out_deactivate;
>  
>   /*
>* if we have relooped after returning idle once, we need to update our
> @@ -3484,7 +3486,7 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct 
> cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun)
>   if (!throttled) {
>   /* mark as potentially idle for the upcoming period */
>   cfs_b->idle = 1;
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return 0;
>   }
>  
>   /* account preceding periods in which throttling occurred */
> @@ -3524,12 +3526,12 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct 
> cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun)
>* timer to remain active while there are any throttled entities.)
>*/
>   cfs_b->idle = 0;
> -out_unlock:
> - if (idle)
> - cfs_b->timer_active = 0;
> - raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
>  
> - return idle;
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_deactivate:
> + cfs_b->timer_active = 0;
> + return 1;
>  }
>  
>  /* a cfs_rq won't donate quota below this amount */
> @@ -3706,6 +3708,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart 
> sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
>   int overrun;
>   int idle = 0;
>  
> + raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
>   for (;;) {
>   now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
>   overrun = hrtimer_forward(timer, now, cfs_b->period);
> @@ -3715,6 +3718,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart 
> sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
>  
>   idle = do_sched_cfs_period_timer(cfs_b, overrun);
>   }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
>  
>   return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
>  }
> @@ -3783,7 +3787,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused 
> unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
>* clock_task is not advancing so we just need to make sure
>* there's some valid quota amount
>*/
> -