Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: avoid false-positive gcc-8 warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann  wrote:
> This is an interesting regression with gcc-8, showing a harmless
> warning for correct code:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
>  ...
>  from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
> include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used uninitialized in this 
> function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>   printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   ^~
> In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was declared here
>
> I tried to come up with a reduced test case for gcc here
> a few times, but every time ended up with code that is actually
> wrong with older gcc versions missing the bug and gcc-8 finding
> it. As this is the only false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> warnign I got with gcc-8 randconfig builds, I'd suggest we
> work around it.
>
> Making the index variable 'unsigned' is enough to shut up
> the warning, as gcc can then see that comparing eqidx to
> phba->io_channel_irqs is fine here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 

Sorry, I have to retract my patch. While it apparently solved the problem
for most randconfig builds, I have now run into another case that it did
not address, and I still get the warning for one caller:

In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
 from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function
'lpfc_debug_dump_all_queues':
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
  struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
   ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
 from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
  struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
   ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

 Arnd

Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: avoid false-positive gcc-8 warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann  wrote:
> This is an interesting regression with gcc-8, showing a harmless
> warning for correct code:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
>  ...
>  from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
> include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used uninitialized in this 
> function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>   printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   ^~
> In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was declared here
>
> I tried to come up with a reduced test case for gcc here
> a few times, but every time ended up with code that is actually
> wrong with older gcc versions missing the bug and gcc-8 finding
> it. As this is the only false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> warnign I got with gcc-8 randconfig builds, I'd suggest we
> work around it.
>
> Making the index variable 'unsigned' is enough to shut up
> the warning, as gcc can then see that comparing eqidx to
> phba->io_channel_irqs is fine here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 

Sorry, I have to retract my patch. While it apparently solved the problem
for most randconfig builds, I have now run into another case that it did
not address, and I still get the warning for one caller:

In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
 from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function
'lpfc_debug_dump_all_queues':
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
  struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
   ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
 from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
 from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
  struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
   ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

 Arnd

Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: avoid false-positive gcc-8 warning

[James Smart]

On 8/23/2017 8:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

This is an interesting regression with gcc-8, showing a harmless
warning for correct code:

In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
  ...
  from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used uninitialized in this 
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
   printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
   ^~
In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was declared here

I tried to come up with a reduced test case for gcc here
a few times, but every time ended up with code that is actually
wrong with older gcc versions missing the bug and gcc-8 finding
it. As this is the only false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
warnign I got with gcc-8 randconfig builds, I'd suggest we
work around it.

Making the index variable 'unsigned' is enough to shut up
the warning, as gcc can then see that comparing eqidx to
phba->io_channel_irqs is fine here.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
---
  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)



looks good. Thanks

Signed-off-by: James Smart 

-- james

Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: avoid false-positive gcc-8 warning

[James Smart]

On 8/23/2017 8:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

This is an interesting regression with gcc-8, showing a harmless
warning for correct code:

In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
  ...
  from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used uninitialized in this 
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
   printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
   ^~
In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was declared here

I tried to come up with a reduced test case for gcc here
a few times, but every time ended up with code that is actually
wrong with older gcc versions missing the bug and gcc-8 finding
it. As this is the only false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
warnign I got with gcc-8 randconfig builds, I'd suggest we
work around it.

Making the index variable 'unsigned' is enough to shut up
the warning, as gcc can then see that comparing eqidx to
phba->io_channel_irqs is fine here.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
---
  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)



looks good. Thanks

Signed-off-by: James Smart 

-- james