On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:04:21AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > This patch explicitly depends on Yinghai's patch, [PATCH v3] x86, irq: get > correct available vectors for cpu disable, which was last posted here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139094603622814&w=2 > > and is not yet in any tree AFAICT. > > P. > Sounds reasonable to me. Just a nitpick.
Acked-by: Gong Chen <gong.c...@linux.intel.com> [...] > + if (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new)) { > + pr_warn("CPU %d disable failed: IRQ %u has no availble > CPUS to transition IRQ.\n", These words looks not fluent to native speaker. (but I'm not native speaker, too ;-))
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature