Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Boris Ostrovsky 
On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun 

Applied to for-linus-4.15

-boris

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Boris Ostrovsky 
On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun 

Applied to for-linus-4.15

-boris

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Juergen Gross 
On 28/12/17 04:46, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun 

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross 


Juergen

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Juergen Gross 
On 28/12/17 04:46, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun 

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross 


Juergen