Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi : cpu hot-remove returns error when cpu_down() fails

2012-10-18 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu

Hi Rafael,

2012/10/19 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Friday 28 of September 2012 19:36:02 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
the cpu. If the cpu has a running process and the cpu is turned the power off,
the system may not work well.

Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat 
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani 
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu 

---
  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |   18 --
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
===
--- linux-3.6-rc7.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c  2012-09-24 
10:10:57.0 +0900
+++ linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c   2012-09-28 
19:16:33.207858261 +0900
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ err_free_pr:
  static int acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
  {
struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
-
+   int ret;

if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -616,8 +616,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove(struct
goto free;

if (type == ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT) {
-   if (acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr))
-   return -EINVAL;
+   ret = acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
}

acpi_processor_power_exit(pr, device);
@@ -848,12 +849,17 @@ static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd

  static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
  {
-   if (cpu_online(pr->id))
-   cpu_down(pr->id);
+   int ret = 0;
+
+   if (cpu_online(pr->id)) {
+   ret = cpu_down(pr->id);


If you defined ret here ...


+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
+   }




arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr->id);
-   return (0);
+   return ret;


... this line wouldn't need to be changed.


Thank you for your review.
O.K. I'll put the return code back.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu




  }
  #else
  static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)


Thanks,
Rafael





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi : cpu hot-remove returns error when cpu_down() fails

2012-10-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 28 of September 2012 19:36:02 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
> But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
> the cpu. If the cpu has a running process and the cpu is turned the power off,
> the system may not work well.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat 
> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani 
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu 
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |   18 --
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> ===
> --- linux-3.6-rc7.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c2012-09-24 
> 10:10:57.0 +0900
> +++ linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2012-09-28 
> 19:16:33.207858261 +0900
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ err_free_pr:
>  static int acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>  {
>   struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
> -
> + int ret;
>  
>   if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
>   return -EINVAL;
> @@ -616,8 +616,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove(struct 
>   goto free;
>  
>   if (type == ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT) {
> - if (acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>   }
>  
>   acpi_processor_power_exit(pr, device);
> @@ -848,12 +849,17 @@ static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd
>  
>  static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  {
> - if (cpu_online(pr->id))
> - cpu_down(pr->id);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (cpu_online(pr->id)) {
> + ret = cpu_down(pr->id);

If you defined ret here ...

> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>  
>   arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
>   acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr->id);
> - return (0);
> + return ret;

... this line wouldn't need to be changed.

>  }
>  #else
>  static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi : cpu hot-remove returns error when cpu_down() fails

2012-10-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 28 of September 2012 19:36:02 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
 Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
 But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
 the cpu. If the cpu has a running process and the cpu is turned the power off,
 the system may not work well.
 
 Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
 Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
 
 ---
  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |   18 --
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 
 Index: linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
 ===
 --- linux-3.6-rc7.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c2012-09-24 
 10:10:57.0 +0900
 +++ linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2012-09-28 
 19:16:33.207858261 +0900
 @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ err_free_pr:
  static int acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
  {
   struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
 -
 + int ret;
  
   if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
   return -EINVAL;
 @@ -616,8 +616,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove(struct 
   goto free;
  
   if (type == ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT) {
 - if (acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr))
 - return -EINVAL;
 + ret = acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr);
 + if (ret)
 + return ret;
   }
  
   acpi_processor_power_exit(pr, device);
 @@ -848,12 +849,17 @@ static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd
  
  static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
  {
 - if (cpu_online(pr-id))
 - cpu_down(pr-id);
 + int ret = 0;
 +
 + if (cpu_online(pr-id)) {
 + ret = cpu_down(pr-id);

If you defined ret here ...

 + if (ret)
 + return ret;
 + }
  
   arch_unregister_cpu(pr-id);
   acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr-id);
 - return (0);
 + return ret;

... this line wouldn't need to be changed.

  }
  #else
  static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi : cpu hot-remove returns error when cpu_down() fails

2012-10-18 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu

Hi Rafael,

2012/10/19 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Friday 28 of September 2012 19:36:02 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
the cpu. If the cpu has a running process and the cpu is turned the power off,
the system may not work well.

Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com

---
  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |   18 --
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
===
--- linux-3.6-rc7.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c  2012-09-24 
10:10:57.0 +0900
+++ linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c   2012-09-28 
19:16:33.207858261 +0900
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ err_free_pr:
  static int acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
  {
struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
-
+   int ret;

if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -616,8 +616,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove(struct
goto free;

if (type == ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT) {
-   if (acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr))
-   return -EINVAL;
+   ret = acpi_processor_handle_eject(pr);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
}

acpi_processor_power_exit(pr, device);
@@ -848,12 +849,17 @@ static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd

  static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
  {
-   if (cpu_online(pr-id))
-   cpu_down(pr-id);
+   int ret = 0;
+
+   if (cpu_online(pr-id)) {
+   ret = cpu_down(pr-id);


If you defined ret here ...


+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
+   }




arch_unregister_cpu(pr-id);
acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr-id);
-   return (0);
+   return ret;


... this line wouldn't need to be changed.


Thank you for your review.
O.K. I'll put the return code back.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu




  }
  #else
  static acpi_status acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)


Thanks,
Rafael





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/