Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace

2023-10-18 Thread Huan Yang



在 2023/10/19 0:28, Yu Zhao 写道:

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:22 AM Huan Yang  wrote:

This patch add two reclaim stat:
nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen.
nr_demote: nr_pages NUMA demotion passed.

The above isn't specific to MLGRU, so they should be in a separate patchset.


OK, nr_demote isn't MGLRU, separate is good, but, if this, nr_demote 
isn't need by

myself, I just add this when I see this code. :)
Please see nr_promote and nr_scanned fix  is MGLRU need?




And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive.

Mistake info like this:
```
kswapd0-89[000]64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive:
nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0
nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0
nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4
flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
```
Correct info like this:
```
  <...>-9041  [006]43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive:
  nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0
  nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0
  nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 nr_demote=0 priority=12
  flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
```

Adding Jaewon & Kalesh to take a look.

Thanks, Huan



Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace

2023-10-18 Thread Yu Zhao
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:22 AM Huan Yang  wrote:
>
> This patch add two reclaim stat:
> nr_promote: nr_pages shrink before promote by folio_update_gen.
> nr_demote: nr_pages NUMA demotion passed.

The above isn't specific to MLGRU, so they should be in a separate patchset.

> And then, use correct nr_scanned which evict_folios passed into
> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive.
>
> Mistake info like this:
> ```
> kswapd0-89[000]64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive:
> nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0
> nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0
> nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4
> flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
> ```
> Correct info like this:
> ```
>  <...>-9041  [006]43.738481: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive:
>  nid=0 nr_scanned=13 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0
>  nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=9 nr_activate_file=0
>  nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 nr_promote=4 nr_demote=0 priority=12
>  flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
> ```

Adding Jaewon & Kalesh to take a look.