Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq
> > +#include > This can just be , because you're only using > wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? > I fixed this up before merging. Yes, right. Thanks for your help! Regards Nam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq
+#include linux/completion.h This can just be linux/wait.h, because you're only using wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? I fixed this up before merging. Yes, right. Thanks for your help! Regards Nam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq
Looks OK to me, queued for 2.6.21, except: > +#include This can just be , because you're only using wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? I fixed this up before merging. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq
Looks OK to me, queued for 2.6.21, except: +#include linux/completion.h This can just be linux/wait.h, because you're only using wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? I fixed this up before merging. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
