Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:15:17PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/06/2013 02:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. > >There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.4-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > patch applied cleanly. > Compile testing - passed > Boot testing - passed > dmesg regression testing - passed > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. Thanks for testing all three of these -rc releases. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On 12/06/2013 02:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.4-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h patch applied cleanly. Compile testing - passed Boot testing - passed dmesg regression testing - passed dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Test systems Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:52:04PM +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:50:50 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. > > Patch applied cleanly on top of 3.12.3. Built & runs with no problems on > both a Thinkpad T60 (x86) and two generic whiteboxes (x64, i5/i7). > No regressions noticed so far. Thanks for testing. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:44:57PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 12/06/2013 01:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. > > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 110 pass: 107 skipped: 3 fail: 0 > > qemu tests all passed. > > Results are as expected. > Details are available as usual at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Nice, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:44:57PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 12/06/2013 01:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build results: total: 110 pass: 107 skipped: 3 fail: 0 qemu tests all passed. Results are as expected. Details are available as usual at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Nice, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:52:04PM +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:50:50 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. Patch applied cleanly on top of 3.12.3. Built runs with no problems on both a Thinkpad T60 (x86) and two generic whiteboxes (x64, i5/i7). No regressions noticed so far. Thanks for testing. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On 12/06/2013 02:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.4-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h patch applied cleanly. Compile testing - passed Boot testing - passed dmesg regression testing - passed dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Test systems Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah...@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:15:17PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.4-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h patch applied cleanly. Compile testing - passed Boot testing - passed dmesg regression testing - passed dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing all three of these -rc releases. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On 12/06/2013 01:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build results: total: 110 pass: 107 skipped: 3 fail: 0 qemu tests all passed. Results are as expected. Details are available as usual at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:50:50 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. Patch applied cleanly on top of 3.12.3. Built & runs with no problems on both a Thinkpad T60 (x86) and two generic whiteboxes (x64, i5/i7). No regressions noticed so far. Thanks! Holger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:50:50 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. Patch applied cleanly on top of 3.12.3. Built runs with no problems on both a Thinkpad T60 (x86) and two generic whiteboxes (x64, i5/i7). No regressions noticed so far. Thanks! Holger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review
On 12/06/2013 01:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. Anything received after that time might be too late. Build results: total: 110 pass: 107 skipped: 3 fail: 0 qemu tests all passed. Results are as expected. Details are available as usual at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
