Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:59:54PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> From the Linaro test farm:
> 
> Summary
> 
> 
> kernel: 4.9.60-rc1
> git repo: 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> git commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
> git describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> Test details: 
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.59)

thanks for testing and letting me know.

No testing of 4.13-rc?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:59:54PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> From the Linaro test farm:
> 
> Summary
> 
> 
> kernel: 4.9.60-rc1
> git repo: 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> git commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
> git describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> Test details: 
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.59)

thanks for testing and letting me know.

No testing of 4.13-rc?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Tom Gall]

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman  
> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

From the Linaro test farm:

Summary


kernel: 4.9.60-rc1
git repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.9.y
git commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
git describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e


No regressions (compared to build v4.9.59)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-

hi6220-hikey - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 7, skip: 8, pass: 38 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 76
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 1, pass: 21
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 122, pass: 986
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 7, skip: 6, pass: 38 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 76
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 10
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - fail: 2, skip: 156, pass: 943 (known failures)
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 6, skip: 11, pass: 36 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1,
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 67, pass: 1040
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12

dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 15, pass: 52 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 76
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 1
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 18
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 1
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 163, pass: 964
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Tom Gall]

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman  
> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

From the Linaro test farm:

Summary


kernel: 4.9.60-rc1
git repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.9.y
git commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
git describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e


No regressions (compared to build v4.9.59)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-

hi6220-hikey - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 7, skip: 8, pass: 38 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 76
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 1, pass: 21
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 122, pass: 986
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 7, skip: 6, pass: 38 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 76
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 10
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - fail: 2, skip: 156, pass: 943 (known failures)
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 13

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 6, skip: 11, pass: 36 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1,
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 67, pass: 1040
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12

dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64
* boot - pass: 20
* kselftest - fail: 15, pass: 52 (known failures)
* libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 76
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 1
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 18
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 1
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 163, pass: 964
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/31/2017 03:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg and kselftest regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/31/2017 03:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.60-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg and kselftest regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 123 pass: 123 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.60 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Nov  2 09:55:07 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 123 pass: 123 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:22:06AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

> > at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab
> > at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
> > sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc: 1 failed lab

> This seems like a lot of failed labs, anything I should be worried
> about?

It's all one lab, a quick poll of results seems to suggest that lab is
having a bad day and some of the boards have booted in other labs so I'd
not worry.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:22:06AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

> > at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab
> > at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
> > sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc: 1 failed lab

> This seems like a lot of failed labs, anything I should be worried
> about?

It's all one lab, a quick poll of results seems to suggest that lab is
having a bad day and some of the boards have booted in other labs so I'd
not worry.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:22:06AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.9.y boot: 272 boots: 18 failed, 226 passed with 24 offline, 
> 4 conflicts (v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e/
> Full Build Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: linux-4.9.y
> Git Describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> Git Commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
> Git URL: 
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 95 unique boards, 24 SoC families, 22 builds out of 187
> 
> Boot Failures Detected:
> 
> arm:
> 
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> imx6q-nitrogen6x: 1 failed lab
> 
> mvebu_v7_defconfig
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-rd: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-xp-linksys-mamba: 1 failed lab
> 
> at91_dt_defconfig
> at91rm9200ek_rootfs:nfs: 1 failed lab
> at91sam9261ek: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y
> alpine-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig
> alpine-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-xp-linksys-mamba: 1 failed lab
> at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab
> at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
> sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc: 1 failed lab

This seems like a lot of failed labs, anything I should be worried
about?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:22:06AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.9.y boot: 272 boots: 18 failed, 226 passed with 24 offline, 
> 4 conflicts (v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e/
> Full Build Summary: 
> https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: linux-4.9.y
> Git Describe: v4.9.59-24-g0aea695df43e
> Git Commit: 0aea695df43ec4454c9bf076a1a7faf264eb074f
> Git URL: 
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 95 unique boards, 24 SoC families, 22 builds out of 187
> 
> Boot Failures Detected:
> 
> arm:
> 
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> imx6q-nitrogen6x: 1 failed lab
> 
> mvebu_v7_defconfig
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-rd: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-xp-linksys-mamba: 1 failed lab
> 
> at91_dt_defconfig
> at91rm9200ek_rootfs:nfs: 1 failed lab
> at91sam9261ek: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y
> alpine-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2: 1 failed lab
> 
> multi_v7_defconfig
> alpine-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-370-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-398-db: 1 failed lab
> armada-xp-linksys-mamba: 1 failed lab
> at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab
> at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
> sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc: 1 failed lab

This seems like a lot of failed labs, anything I should be worried
about?

thanks,

greg k-h