Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
Hi Greg, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:38:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: (gcc version 10.2.1 20210406) mips: 63 configs -> no new failure arm: 105 configs -> no new failure x86_64: 2 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any problems here: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On 2021/4/12 16:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.30-rc1, Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.30-rc1 Commit: 8ac4b1deedaa507b5d0f46316e7f32004dd99cd1 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC) arm64: Testcase Result Summary: total: 5264 passed: 5264 failed: 0 timeout: 0 x86: Testcase Result Summary: total: 5264 passed: 5264 failed: 0 timeout: 0 Tested-by: Hulk Robot
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 14:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ## Build * kernel: 5.10.30-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 8ac4b1deedaa507b5d0f46316e7f32004dd99cd1 * git describe: v5.10.29-189-g8ac4b1deedaa * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.29-189-g8ac4b1deedaa ## No regressions (compared to v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33) ## No fixes (compared to v5.10.28-42-g18f507c37f33) ## Test result summary total: 75890, pass: 63301, fail: 2174, skip: 10129, xfail: 286, ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 2 total, 1 passed, 1 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:38:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 454 pass: 454 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On 4/12/21 2:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan thanks, -- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
On 4/12/2021 1:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian
Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review
Hello all, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:38:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h I tested 5.10.30-rc1 on my i686, the kernel was compiled with gcc 10.2 using make localmodconfig. I found no issues to compile and run the kernel. Selftest resluts [ok/not ok]: [1434/82] "Regression" (compared with 5.10.29-rc1): 75d74 < not ok 1 selftests: rtc: rtctest # TIMEOUT 90 seconds 80d78 < not ok 9 selftests: timers: rtcpie # exit=255 These test results were fluctuating for the previous kernels as well, thus I can't conclude that this "regression" is actually a real regression. Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov
