Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] bonding: use __dev_get_by_name instead of dev_get_by_name to find interface
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:41:01PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote:
The following call chain indicates that bond_do_ioctl() is protected
under rtnl_lock. If we use __dev_get_by_name() instead of
dev_get_by_name() to find interface handler in it, this would
help us avoid to change reference counter of interface once.
dev_ioctl()
rtnl_lock()
dev_ifsioc()
bond_do_ioctl()
rtnl_unlock()
Additionally we also change the coding style in bond_do_ioctl(),
letting it more readable for us.
Cc: Jay Vosburgh
Cc: Veaceslav Falico
Acked-by: Veaceslav Falico
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 49 ++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e06c445..a69afbf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3213,37 +3213,34 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev,
struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
- slave_dev = dev_get_by_name(net, ifr->ifr_slave);
+ slave_dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr->ifr_slave);
pr_debug("slave_dev=%p:\n", slave_dev);
if (!slave_dev)
- res = -ENODEV;
- else {
- pr_debug("slave_dev->name=%s:\n", slave_dev->name);
- switch (cmd) {
- case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
- res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- break;
- case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
- res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- break;
- case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
- bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- res = 0;
- break;
- case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
- res = bond_option_active_slave_set(bond, slave_dev);
- break;
- default:
- res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ return -ENODEV;
- dev_put(slave_dev);
+ pr_debug("slave_dev->name=%s:\n", slave_dev->name);
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
+ res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
+ res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
+ bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ res = 0;
+ break;
+ case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
+ res = bond_option_active_slave_set(bond, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ default:
+ res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return res;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] bonding: use __dev_get_by_name instead of dev_get_by_name to find interface
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:41:01PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote:
The following call chain indicates that bond_do_ioctl() is protected
under rtnl_lock. If we use __dev_get_by_name() instead of
dev_get_by_name() to find interface handler in it, this would
help us avoid to change reference counter of interface once.
dev_ioctl()
rtnl_lock()
dev_ifsioc()
bond_do_ioctl()
rtnl_unlock()
Additionally we also change the coding style in bond_do_ioctl(),
letting it more readable for us.
Cc: Jay Vosburgh fu...@us.ibm.com
Cc: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue ying@windriver.com
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 49 ++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e06c445..a69afbf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3213,37 +3213,34 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev,
struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
if (!ns_capable(net-user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
- slave_dev = dev_get_by_name(net, ifr-ifr_slave);
+ slave_dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr-ifr_slave);
pr_debug(slave_dev=%p:\n, slave_dev);
if (!slave_dev)
- res = -ENODEV;
- else {
- pr_debug(slave_dev-name=%s:\n, slave_dev-name);
- switch (cmd) {
- case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
- res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- break;
- case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
- res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- break;
- case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
- bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- res = 0;
- break;
- case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
- case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
- res = bond_option_active_slave_set(bond, slave_dev);
- break;
- default:
- res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ return -ENODEV;
- dev_put(slave_dev);
+ pr_debug(slave_dev-name=%s:\n, slave_dev-name);
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
+ res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
+ res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
+ bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ res = 0;
+ break;
+ case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
+ res = bond_option_active_slave_set(bond, slave_dev);
+ break;
+ default:
+ res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return res;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
