Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC] regmap: Add no-"bus" configuration possibility
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Second version of the patch with incorporated suggestions form > Mark(hopefully): >https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/20/249 > > Once again at this point this patch is for illustrative purposes. If > the overall structure and nature of the change is agreed upon, I'll > work on properly implementing it and testing it with my driver code(SI476X). This looks basically good - I'd like to see the refactoring changes split out from the new API (and in general done in smaller hunks) as it's a very big and invasive change but the top level API and the basic idea look good. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC] regmap: Add no-bus configuration possibility
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: Second version of the patch with incorporated suggestions form Mark(hopefully): https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/20/249 Once again at this point this patch is for illustrative purposes. If the overall structure and nature of the change is agreed upon, I'll work on properly implementing it and testing it with my driver code(SI476X). This looks basically good - I'd like to see the refactoring changes split out from the new API (and in general done in smaller hunks) as it's a very big and invasive change but the top level API and the basic idea look good. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
