Re: [PATCH v2] devfreq: Add tracepoint for frequency changes

2019-09-25 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:56:15AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 19. 9. 25. 오전 4:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:15:57AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> > 
> > sorry for the delayed response, you message got buried in my
> > mailbox.
> > 
> >> On 19. 9. 20. 오전 2:44, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >>> Add a tracepoint for frequency changes of devfreq devices and
> >>> use it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke 
> >>> ---
> >>> (sending v2 without much delay wrt v1, since the change in devfreq
> >>>  probably isn't controversial, and I'll be offline a few days)
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - included trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() in the condition
> >>>   to avoid unnecessary evaluation when the trace point is
> >>>   disabled
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c  |  3 +++
> >>>  include/trace/events/devfreq.h | 18 ++
> >>>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> >>> index ab22bf8a12d6..e9f04dcafb01 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> >>> @@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq 
> >>> *devfreq, unsigned long new_freq,
> >>>  
> >>>   devfreq->previous_freq = new_freq;
> >>>  
> >>> + if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() && new_freq != cur_freq)
> >>> + trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq, new_freq);
> >>
> >> You can change as following without 'new_freq' variable
> >> because devfreq->previous_freq is the new frequency.   
> >>trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq);
> > 
> > In general that sounds good.
> > 
> > devfreq essentially uses df->previous_freq as df->cur_freq, I think
> > most code using it would be clearer if we renamed it accordingly.
> > I'll send a separate patch for this.
> 
> Actually, according to reference time of the 'df->previous_freq',
> 'previous_freq' is proper or 'cur_freq is proper.
> But, In the comment of 'struct devfreq',
> it means the configured time as following: 
>   * @previous_freq:  previously configured frequency value.

sure, I wouldn't expect the comment of a variable/field called 'previous_freq'
say that it's the current frequency.

> I think that it it not big problem to keep the name.

It's indeed not a big problem, because the code works either way, something
like 'cur_freq' would just be less confusing.

These are the functions that use 'previous_freq' and how they use it:

devfreq_set_target
devfreq_monitor_suspend
cur_freq_show
target_freq_show
trans_stat_show
devfreq_passive_notifier_call
devfreq_userspace_func
  cur freq

devfreq_update_status
  prev freq

More than 85% use the variable as current frequency, which seems like a
good argument to give it the proper name, instead of having folks wonder
why the previous frequency is used.


Re: [PATCH v2] devfreq: Add tracepoint for frequency changes

2019-09-24 Thread Chanwoo Choi
On 19. 9. 25. 오전 4:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:15:57AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi,
> 
> sorry for the delayed response, you message got buried in my
> mailbox.
> 
>> On 19. 9. 20. 오전 2:44, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> Add a tracepoint for frequency changes of devfreq devices and
>>> use it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke 
>>> ---
>>> (sending v2 without much delay wrt v1, since the change in devfreq
>>>  probably isn't controversial, and I'll be offline a few days)
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - included trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() in the condition
>>>   to avoid unnecessary evaluation when the trace point is
>>>   disabled
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c  |  3 +++
>>>  include/trace/events/devfreq.h | 18 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> index ab22bf8a12d6..e9f04dcafb01 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> @@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq *devfreq, 
>>> unsigned long new_freq,
>>>  
>>> devfreq->previous_freq = new_freq;
>>>  
>>> +   if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() && new_freq != cur_freq)
>>> +   trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq, new_freq);
>>
>> You can change as following without 'new_freq' variable
>> because devfreq->previous_freq is the new frequency. 
>>  trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq);
> 
> In general that sounds good.
> 
> devfreq essentially uses df->previous_freq as df->cur_freq, I think
> most code using it would be clearer if we renamed it accordingly.
> I'll send a separate patch for this.

Actually, according to reference time of the 'df->previous_freq',
'previous_freq' is proper or 'cur_freq is proper.
But, In the comment of 'struct devfreq',
it means the configured time as following: 
* @previous_freq:  previously configured frequency value.
I think that it it not big problem to keep the name.

> 
>>> +
>>> if (devfreq->suspend_freq)
>>> devfreq->resume_freq = cur_freq;
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
>>> index cf5b8772175d..a62d32fe3c33 100644
>>> --- a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
>>> @@ -8,6 +8,24 @@
>>>  #include 
>>>  #include 
>>>  
>>> +TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_frequency,
>>> +   TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq),
>>
>> 'unsigned long freq' parameter is not necessary.
>>
>>> +
>>> +   TP_ARGS(devfreq, freq),
>>> +
>>> +   TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> +   __string(dev_name, dev_name(>dev))
>>> +   __field(unsigned long, freq)
>>> +   ),
>>> +
>>> +   TP_fast_assign(
>>> +   __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(>dev));
>>> +   __entry->freq = freq;
>>
>> Initialize the new frequency with 'devfreq->previous_freq' as following:
>>
>>  __entry->freq = devfreq->previous_freq;
>>
>>> +   ),
>>> +
>>> +   TP_printk("dev_name=%s freq=%lu", __get_str(dev_name), __entry->freq)
>>> +);
>>> +
>>>  TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_monitor,
>>> TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq),
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>> Samsung Electronics
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics


Re: [PATCH v2] devfreq: Add tracepoint for frequency changes

2019-09-24 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:15:57AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,

sorry for the delayed response, you message got buried in my
mailbox.

> On 19. 9. 20. 오전 2:44, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Add a tracepoint for frequency changes of devfreq devices and
> > use it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke 
> > ---
> > (sending v2 without much delay wrt v1, since the change in devfreq
> >  probably isn't controversial, and I'll be offline a few days)
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - included trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() in the condition
> >   to avoid unnecessary evaluation when the trace point is
> >   disabled
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c  |  3 +++
> >  include/trace/events/devfreq.h | 18 ++
> >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> > index ab22bf8a12d6..e9f04dcafb01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> > @@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq *devfreq, 
> > unsigned long new_freq,
> >  
> > devfreq->previous_freq = new_freq;
> >  
> > +   if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() && new_freq != cur_freq)
> > +   trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq, new_freq);
> 
> You can change as following without 'new_freq' variable
> because devfreq->previous_freq is the new frequency.  
>   trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq);

In general that sounds good.

devfreq essentially uses df->previous_freq as df->cur_freq, I think
most code using it would be clearer if we renamed it accordingly.
I'll send a separate patch for this.

> > +
> > if (devfreq->suspend_freq)
> > devfreq->resume_freq = cur_freq;
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> > index cf5b8772175d..a62d32fe3c33 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> > @@ -8,6 +8,24 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  
> > +TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_frequency,
> > +   TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq),
> 
> 'unsigned long freq' parameter is not necessary.
> 
> > +
> > +   TP_ARGS(devfreq, freq),
> > +
> > +   TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > +   __string(dev_name, dev_name(>dev))
> > +   __field(unsigned long, freq)
> > +   ),
> > +
> > +   TP_fast_assign(
> > +   __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(>dev));
> > +   __entry->freq = freq;
> 
> Initialize the new frequency with 'devfreq->previous_freq' as following:
> 
>   __entry->freq = devfreq->previous_freq;
> 
> > +   ),
> > +
> > +   TP_printk("dev_name=%s freq=%lu", __get_str(dev_name), __entry->freq)
> > +);
> > +
> >  TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_monitor,
> > TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq),
> >  
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
> Samsung Electronics


Re: [PATCH v2] devfreq: Add tracepoint for frequency changes

2019-09-19 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi,

On 19. 9. 20. 오전 2:44, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Add a tracepoint for frequency changes of devfreq devices and
> use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke 
> ---
> (sending v2 without much delay wrt v1, since the change in devfreq
>  probably isn't controversial, and I'll be offline a few days)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - included trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() in the condition
>   to avoid unnecessary evaluation when the trace point is
>   disabled
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c  |  3 +++
>  include/trace/events/devfreq.h | 18 ++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index ab22bf8a12d6..e9f04dcafb01 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq *devfreq, 
> unsigned long new_freq,
>  
>   devfreq->previous_freq = new_freq;
>  
> + if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() && new_freq != cur_freq)
> + trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq, new_freq);

You can change as following without 'new_freq' variable
because devfreq->previous_freq is the new frequency.
trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq);

> +
>   if (devfreq->suspend_freq)
>   devfreq->resume_freq = cur_freq;
>  
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> index cf5b8772175d..a62d32fe3c33 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/devfreq.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,24 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_frequency,
> + TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq),

'unsigned long freq' parameter is not necessary.

> +
> + TP_ARGS(devfreq, freq),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(dev_name, dev_name(>dev))
> + __field(unsigned long, freq)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(>dev));
> + __entry->freq = freq;

Initialize the new frequency with 'devfreq->previous_freq' as following:

__entry->freq = devfreq->previous_freq;

> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev_name=%s freq=%lu", __get_str(dev_name), __entry->freq)
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(devfreq_monitor,
>   TP_PROTO(struct devfreq *devfreq),
>  
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics


Re: [PATCH v2] devfreq: Add tracepoint for frequency changes

2019-09-19 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:44:23 -0700
Matthias Kaehlcke  wrote:

> Add a tracepoint for frequency changes of devfreq devices and
> use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke 

>From the tracing point of view:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) 

-- Steve