Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: GICv3: Convert to EOImode == 1

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Auger
Hi Marc,
On 08/13/2015 10:28 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> So far, GICv3 has been used in with EOImode == 0. The effect of this
> mode is to perform the priority drop and the deactivation of the
> interrupt at the same time.
> 
> While this works perfectly for Linux (we only have a single priority),
> it causes issues when an interrupt is forwarded to a guest, and when
> we want the guest to perform the EOI itself.
> 
> For this case, the GIC architecture provides EOImode == 1, where:
> - A write to ICC_EOIR1_EL1 drops the priority of the interrupt and leaves
> it active. Other interrupts at the same priority level can now be taken,
> but the active interrupt cannot be taken again
> - A write to ICC_DIR_EL1 marks the interrupt as inactive, meaning it can
> now be taken again.
> 
> This patch converts the driver to be able to use this new mode, depending
> on whether or not the kernel can behave as a hypervisor. No feature change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier 
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c   | 37 +
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  9 +
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index c52f7ba..61190fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
>  
>  #include "irq-gic-common.h"
>  #include "irqchip.h"
> @@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
>  };
>  
>  static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
> +static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
>  
>  #define gic_data_rdist() (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist))
>  #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base)
> @@ -293,7 +295,14 @@ static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>  
>  static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
> - gic_write_eoir(gic_irq(d));
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate)) {
> + /* No need to deactivate an LPI */
> + if (gic_irq(d) >= 8192)
> + return;
> + gic_write_dir(gic_irq(d));
> + } else {
> + gic_write_eoir(gic_irq(d));
> + }
>  }
>  
>  static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> @@ -343,15 +352,24 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry 
> gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
>  
>   if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
>   int err;
> +
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate))
> + gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> +
>   err = handle_domain_irq(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
>   if (err) {
>   WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected interrupt 
> received!\n");
> - gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate))
> + gic_write_dir(irqnr);
shouldn't be needed to DIR the irq if LPI but is it harmful? Just
because we don't do it on gic_eoi_irq ...

Best Regards

Eric
> + else
> + gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
>   }
>   continue;
>   }
>   if (irqnr < 16) {
>   gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate))
> + gic_write_dir(irqnr);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>   handle_IPI(irqnr, regs);
>  #else
> @@ -451,8 +469,13 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
>   /* Set priority mask register */
>   gic_write_pmr(DEFAULT_PMR_VALUE);
>  
> - /* EOI deactivates interrupt too (mode 0) */
> - gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop_dir);
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate)) {
> + /* EOI drops priority only (mode 1) */
> + gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop);
> + } else {
> + /* EOI deactivates interrupt too (mode 0) */
> + gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop_dir);
> + }
>  
>   /* ... and let's hit the road... */
>   gic_write_grpen1(1);
> @@ -820,6 +843,12 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, 
> struct device_node *pare
>   if (of_property_read_u64(node, "redistributor-stride", _stride))
>   redist_stride = 0;
>  
> + if (!is_hyp_mode_available())
> + static_key_slow_dec(_deactivate);
> +
> + if (static_key_true(_deactivate))
> + pr_info("GIC: Using split EOI/Deactivate mode\n");
> +
>   gic_data.dist_base = dist_base;
>   gic_data.redist_regions = rdist_regs;
>   gic_data.nr_redist_regions = nr_redist_regions;
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h 
> b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index ffbc034..bc98832 100644
> --- 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: GICv3: Convert to EOImode == 1

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Auger
Hi Marc,
On 08/13/2015 10:28 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
 So far, GICv3 has been used in with EOImode == 0. The effect of this
 mode is to perform the priority drop and the deactivation of the
 interrupt at the same time.
 
 While this works perfectly for Linux (we only have a single priority),
 it causes issues when an interrupt is forwarded to a guest, and when
 we want the guest to perform the EOI itself.
 
 For this case, the GIC architecture provides EOImode == 1, where:
 - A write to ICC_EOIR1_EL1 drops the priority of the interrupt and leaves
 it active. Other interrupts at the same priority level can now be taken,
 but the active interrupt cannot be taken again
 - A write to ICC_DIR_EL1 marks the interrupt as inactive, meaning it can
 now be taken again.
 
 This patch converts the driver to be able to use this new mode, depending
 on whether or not the kernel can behave as a hypervisor. No feature change.
 
 Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
 ---
  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c   | 37 +
  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  9 +
  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
 index c52f7ba..61190fb 100644
 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
 +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
 @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  #include asm/cputype.h
  #include asm/exception.h
  #include asm/smp_plat.h
 +#include asm/virt.h
  
  #include irq-gic-common.h
  #include irqchip.h
 @@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
  };
  
  static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
 +static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
  
  #define gic_data_rdist() (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist))
  #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()-rd_base)
 @@ -293,7 +295,14 @@ static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
  
  static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
  {
 - gic_write_eoir(gic_irq(d));
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate)) {
 + /* No need to deactivate an LPI */
 + if (gic_irq(d) = 8192)
 + return;
 + gic_write_dir(gic_irq(d));
 + } else {
 + gic_write_eoir(gic_irq(d));
 + }
  }
  
  static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 @@ -343,15 +352,24 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry 
 gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
  
   if (likely(irqnr  15  irqnr  1020) || irqnr = 8192) {
   int err;
 +
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate))
 + gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
 +
   err = handle_domain_irq(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
   if (err) {
   WARN_ONCE(true, Unexpected interrupt 
 received!\n);
 - gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate))
 + gic_write_dir(irqnr);
shouldn't be needed to DIR the irq if LPI but is it harmful? Just
because we don't do it on gic_eoi_irq ...

Best Regards

Eric
 + else
 + gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
   }
   continue;
   }
   if (irqnr  16) {
   gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate))
 + gic_write_dir(irqnr);
  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
   handle_IPI(irqnr, regs);
  #else
 @@ -451,8 +469,13 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
   /* Set priority mask register */
   gic_write_pmr(DEFAULT_PMR_VALUE);
  
 - /* EOI deactivates interrupt too (mode 0) */
 - gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop_dir);
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate)) {
 + /* EOI drops priority only (mode 1) */
 + gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop);
 + } else {
 + /* EOI deactivates interrupt too (mode 0) */
 + gic_write_ctlr(ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOImode_drop_dir);
 + }
  
   /* ... and let's hit the road... */
   gic_write_grpen1(1);
 @@ -820,6 +843,12 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, 
 struct device_node *pare
   if (of_property_read_u64(node, redistributor-stride, redist_stride))
   redist_stride = 0;
  
 + if (!is_hyp_mode_available())
 + static_key_slow_dec(supports_deactivate);
 +
 + if (static_key_true(supports_deactivate))
 + pr_info(GIC: Using split EOI/Deactivate mode\n);
 +
   gic_data.dist_base = dist_base;
   gic_data.redist_regions = rdist_regs;
   gic_data.nr_redist_regions = nr_redist_regions;
 diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h 
 b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
 index ffbc034..bc98832 100644
 ---