Re: [PATCH v20 11/17] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Introduce some new structs to prepare for GTDT
Hi Hanjun, On 19 January 2017 at 16:28, Hanjun Guowrote: > On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu@linaro.org wrote: >> >> From: Fu Wei >> >> The patch introduce two new structs: arch_timer_mem, arch_timer_mem_frame. >> And also introduce a new define: ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES >> >> These will be used for refactoring the memory-mapped timer init code to >> prepare for GTDT >> >> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei >> --- >> include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 17 + >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> index 4a98c06..b7dd185 100644 >> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr { >> #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS 2 >> #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_VIRT_ACCESS 3 >> >> +#define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES 8 >> + >> #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_PCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 0) /* physical counter */ >> #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_VCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 1) /* virtual counter */ >> #define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN (1 << 2) >> @@ -72,6 +74,21 @@ struct arch_timer_kvm_info { >> int virtual_irq; >> }; >> >> +struct arch_timer_mem_frame { >> + int frame_nr; >> + phys_addr_t cntbase; >> + size_t size; >> + int phys_irq; >> + int virt_irq; >> +}; >> + >> +struct arch_timer_mem { >> + phys_addr_t cntctlbase; >> + size_t size; >> + int num_frames; >> + struct arch_timer_mem_frame frame[ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES]; >> +}; > > > Since struct is introduced but not used in this patch, how about > squash it with patch 12/17? In the previous patchset, I have been suggested that I should split it out. > > Thanks > Hanjun -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat
Re: [PATCH v20 11/17] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Introduce some new structs to prepare for GTDT
Hi Hanjun, On 19 January 2017 at 16:28, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu@linaro.org wrote: >> >> From: Fu Wei >> >> The patch introduce two new structs: arch_timer_mem, arch_timer_mem_frame. >> And also introduce a new define: ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES >> >> These will be used for refactoring the memory-mapped timer init code to >> prepare for GTDT >> >> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei >> --- >> include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 17 + >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> index 4a98c06..b7dd185 100644 >> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr { >> #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS 2 >> #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_VIRT_ACCESS 3 >> >> +#define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES 8 >> + >> #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_PCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 0) /* physical counter */ >> #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_VCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 1) /* virtual counter */ >> #define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN (1 << 2) >> @@ -72,6 +74,21 @@ struct arch_timer_kvm_info { >> int virtual_irq; >> }; >> >> +struct arch_timer_mem_frame { >> + int frame_nr; >> + phys_addr_t cntbase; >> + size_t size; >> + int phys_irq; >> + int virt_irq; >> +}; >> + >> +struct arch_timer_mem { >> + phys_addr_t cntctlbase; >> + size_t size; >> + int num_frames; >> + struct arch_timer_mem_frame frame[ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES]; >> +}; > > > Since struct is introduced but not used in this patch, how about > squash it with patch 12/17? In the previous patchset, I have been suggested that I should split it out. > > Thanks > Hanjun -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat
Re: [PATCH v20 11/17] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Introduce some new structs to prepare for GTDT
On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu@linaro.org wrote: From: Fu WeiThe patch introduce two new structs: arch_timer_mem, arch_timer_mem_frame. And also introduce a new define: ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES These will be used for refactoring the memory-mapped timer init code to prepare for GTDT Signed-off-by: Fu Wei --- include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h index 4a98c06..b7dd185 100644 --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr { #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS 2 #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_VIRT_ACCESS 3 +#define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES 8 + #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_PCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 0) /* physical counter */ #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_VCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 1) /* virtual counter */ #define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN (1 << 2) @@ -72,6 +74,21 @@ struct arch_timer_kvm_info { int virtual_irq; }; +struct arch_timer_mem_frame { + int frame_nr; + phys_addr_t cntbase; + size_t size; + int phys_irq; + int virt_irq; +}; + +struct arch_timer_mem { + phys_addr_t cntctlbase; + size_t size; + int num_frames; + struct arch_timer_mem_frame frame[ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES]; +}; Since struct is introduced but not used in this patch, how about squash it with patch 12/17? Thanks Hanjun
Re: [PATCH v20 11/17] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Introduce some new structs to prepare for GTDT
On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu@linaro.org wrote: From: Fu Wei The patch introduce two new structs: arch_timer_mem, arch_timer_mem_frame. And also introduce a new define: ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES These will be used for refactoring the memory-mapped timer init code to prepare for GTDT Signed-off-by: Fu Wei --- include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h index 4a98c06..b7dd185 100644 --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr { #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS 2 #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_VIRT_ACCESS 3 +#define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES 8 + #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_PCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 0) /* physical counter */ #define ARCH_TIMER_USR_VCT_ACCESS_EN (1 << 1) /* virtual counter */ #define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN (1 << 2) @@ -72,6 +74,21 @@ struct arch_timer_kvm_info { int virtual_irq; }; +struct arch_timer_mem_frame { + int frame_nr; + phys_addr_t cntbase; + size_t size; + int phys_irq; + int virt_irq; +}; + +struct arch_timer_mem { + phys_addr_t cntctlbase; + size_t size; + int num_frames; + struct arch_timer_mem_frame frame[ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES]; +}; Since struct is introduced but not used in this patch, how about squash it with patch 12/17? Thanks Hanjun