Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-09-10 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Wed 22 Aug 10:36 PDT 2018, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
[..]
> +
> + vdd_qusb_hs0:
> + vdda_hp_pcie_core:
> + vdda_mipi_csi0_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_csi1_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_csi2_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_dsi0_pll:
> + vdda_mipi_dsi1_pll:
> + vdda_qlink_lv:
> + vdda_qlink_lv_ck:
> + vdda_qrefs_0p875:
> + vdda_pcie_core:
> + vdda_pll_cc_ebi01:
> + vdda_pll_cc_ebi23:
> + vdda_sp_sensor:
> + vdda_ufs1_core:
> + vdda_ufs2_core:
> + vdda_usb1_ss_core:
> + vdda_usb2_ss_core:

While I agree with Doug that it would be connect to use the input pin
name to describe the supplies of the various block I don't like the
level of indirection it results in when reading the dts.

So I would prefer that any of these just reference vreg_l1a_0p875
directly.


That said, the patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 

Regards,
Bjorn


Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-09-10 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Wed 22 Aug 10:36 PDT 2018, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
[..]
> +
> + vdd_qusb_hs0:
> + vdda_hp_pcie_core:
> + vdda_mipi_csi0_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_csi1_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_csi2_0p9:
> + vdda_mipi_dsi0_pll:
> + vdda_mipi_dsi1_pll:
> + vdda_qlink_lv:
> + vdda_qlink_lv_ck:
> + vdda_qrefs_0p875:
> + vdda_pcie_core:
> + vdda_pll_cc_ebi01:
> + vdda_pll_cc_ebi23:
> + vdda_sp_sensor:
> + vdda_ufs1_core:
> + vdda_ufs2_core:
> + vdda_usb1_ss_core:
> + vdda_usb2_ss_core:

While I agree with Doug that it would be connect to use the input pin
name to describe the supplies of the various block I don't like the
level of indirection it results in when reading the dts.

So I would prefer that any of these just reference vreg_l1a_0p875
directly.


That said, the patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 

Regards,
Bjorn


Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-08-22 10:36:28)
> Add regulator devices for PMIC regulators managed via VRM and XOB
> RPMh accelerators.
> 
> A few notes here:
> - Regulators are added directly to the board file.  While it's true
>   that this will mean a bunch of copy/pasting for other boards that
>   are very similar, this is probably the right call since boards
>   could make changes to the way these regulators are hooked up and
>   trying to find a way to avoid duplication will result in some
>   confusing node overrides.
> - Regulators that are hooked up to supply pins on the SoC are given
>   an alias matching the name of that pin (pin name comes from the
>   Qualcomm SoC "device specification" doc).
> - Other regulator labels are based on the schematic.  If there is
>   more than one logical name on the schematic for the same rail the
>   secondary names are also listed and should be referred to as
>   appropriate.
> - Regulators all default to HPM mode w/ no ability to switch modes.
>   Future patches can switch things to LPM and possibly add
>   dynamic load switching if we have determined there's a benefit.
>   This should only be done for rails where we'll actually be able
>   to take advantage of the lower power modes so we don't need to
>   churn with lots of patches adding regulator_set_load() calls
>   to drivers.
> 
> NOTE: This patch is loosely based on one originally shared to me by
> David Collins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson 
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd 



Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Add RPMh VRM/XOB regulators

2018-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-08-22 10:36:28)
> Add regulator devices for PMIC regulators managed via VRM and XOB
> RPMh accelerators.
> 
> A few notes here:
> - Regulators are added directly to the board file.  While it's true
>   that this will mean a bunch of copy/pasting for other boards that
>   are very similar, this is probably the right call since boards
>   could make changes to the way these regulators are hooked up and
>   trying to find a way to avoid duplication will result in some
>   confusing node overrides.
> - Regulators that are hooked up to supply pins on the SoC are given
>   an alias matching the name of that pin (pin name comes from the
>   Qualcomm SoC "device specification" doc).
> - Other regulator labels are based on the schematic.  If there is
>   more than one logical name on the schematic for the same rail the
>   secondary names are also listed and should be referred to as
>   appropriate.
> - Regulators all default to HPM mode w/ no ability to switch modes.
>   Future patches can switch things to LPM and possibly add
>   dynamic load switching if we have determined there's a benefit.
>   This should only be done for rails where we'll actually be able
>   to take advantage of the lower power modes so we don't need to
>   churn with lots of patches adding regulator_set_load() calls
>   to drivers.
> 
> NOTE: This patch is loosely based on one originally shared to me by
> David Collins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson 
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd