Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:26:44PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > > > From: Ladislav Michl> > > > > > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that > > > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value > > > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for > > > that purpose. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl > > > --- > > > drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer > > > *timer, int prescaler) > > > if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { > > > l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; > > > l |= prescaler << 2; > > > + } else { > > > + if (prescaler != -1) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. > > I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole > > approach a bit later (and better). > > Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you. Yes. I rebased event capture patches on top of this serie (based on linux-next) and will post them during next week for review. Fixed patch will be included (note, it is not really needed for your serie as noone is calling this function). > > > > > } > > > omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); > > > > Sorry for the noise, > > ladis > >
Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:26:44PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > > > From: Ladislav Michl > > > > > > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that > > > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value > > > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for > > > that purpose. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl > > > --- > > > drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > > > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer > > > *timer, int prescaler) > > > if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { > > > l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; > > > l |= prescaler << 2; > > > + } else { > > > + if (prescaler != -1) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. > > I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole > > approach a bit later (and better). > > Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you. Yes. I rebased event capture patches on top of this serie (based on linux-next) and will post them during next week for review. Fixed patch will be included (note, it is not really needed for your serie as noone is calling this function). > > > > > } > > > omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); > > > > Sorry for the noise, > > ladis > >
Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: From: Ladislav MichlInvalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl --- drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int prescaler) if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; l |= prescaler << 2; + } else { + if (prescaler != -1) + return -EINVAL; Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole approach a bit later (and better). Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you. } omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); Sorry for the noise, ladis
Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: From: Ladislav Michl Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl --- drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer *timer, int prescaler) if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; l |= prescaler << 2; + } else { + if (prescaler != -1) + return -EINVAL; Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole approach a bit later (and better). Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you. } omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); Sorry for the noise, ladis
Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > From: Ladislav Michl> > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for > that purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl > --- > drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer > *timer, int prescaler) > if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { > l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; > l |= prescaler << 2; > + } else { > + if (prescaler != -1) > + return -EINVAL; Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole approach a bit later (and better). > } > omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); > Sorry for the noise, ladis
Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: > From: Ladislav Michl > > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for > that purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl > --- > drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer > *timer, int prescaler) > if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) { > l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE; > l |= prescaler << 2; > + } else { > + if (prescaler != -1) > + return -EINVAL; Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled. I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole approach a bit later (and better). > } > omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l); > Sorry for the noise, ladis