Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-07 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:26:44PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> > > From: Ladislav Michl 
> > > 
> > > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
> > > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
> > > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
> > > that purpose.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
> > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c 
> > > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
> > > *timer, int prescaler)
> > >   if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
> > >   l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
> > >   l |= prescaler << 2;
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (prescaler != -1)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
> > I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
> > approach a bit later (and better).
> 
> Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you.

Yes. I rebased event capture patches on top of this serie (based on
linux-next) and will post them during next week for review. Fixed
patch will be included (note, it is not really needed for your serie
as noone is calling this function).

> > 
> > >   }
> > >   omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
> > 
> > Sorry for the noise,
> > ladis
> > 


Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-07 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:26:44PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> > > From: Ladislav Michl 
> > > 
> > > Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
> > > by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
> > > disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
> > > that purpose.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
> > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c 
> > > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> > > @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
> > > *timer, int prescaler)
> > >   if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
> > >   l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
> > >   l |= prescaler << 2;
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (prescaler != -1)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
> > I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
> > approach a bit later (and better).
> 
> Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you.

Yes. I rebased event capture patches on top of this serie (based on
linux-next) and will post them during next week for review. Fixed
patch will be included (note, it is not really needed for your serie
as noone is calling this function).

> > 
> > >   }
> > >   omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
> > 
> > Sorry for the noise,
> > ladis
> > 


Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-07 Thread Keerthy



On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote:

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:

From: Ladislav Michl 

Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
---
  drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
@@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
*timer, int prescaler)
if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
l |= prescaler << 2;
+   } else {
+   if (prescaler != -1)
+   return -EINVAL;


Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
approach a bit later (and better).


Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you.




}
omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
  


Sorry for the noise,
ladis



Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-07 Thread Keerthy



On 1/5/2018 4:17 AM, Ladislav Michl wrote:

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:

From: Ladislav Michl 

Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
---
  drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
@@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
*timer, int prescaler)
if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
l |= prescaler << 2;
+   } else {
+   if (prescaler != -1)
+   return -EINVAL;


Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
approach a bit later (and better).


Okay. I hope the rest 9 patches work well for you.




}
omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
  


Sorry for the noise,
ladis



Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-04 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> From: Ladislav Michl 
> 
> Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
> by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
> disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
> that purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
> *timer, int prescaler)
>   if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
>   l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
>   l |= prescaler << 2;
> + } else {
> + if (prescaler != -1)
> + return -EINVAL;

Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
approach a bit later (and better).

>   }
>   omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
>  

Sorry for the noise,
ladis


Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] clocksource: timer-dm: Check prescaler value

2018-01-04 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:39:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> From: Ladislav Michl 
> 
> Invalid prescaler value is silently ignored. Fix that
> by returning -EINVAL in such case. As invalid value
> disabled use of the prescaler, use -1 explicitely for
> that purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl 
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> index 60db173..01a9cb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-dm.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,9 @@ int omap_dm_timer_set_prescaler(struct omap_dm_timer 
> *timer, int prescaler)
>   if (prescaler >= 0x00 && prescaler <= 0x07) {
>   l |= OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_PRE;
>   l |= prescaler << 2;
> + } else {
> + if (prescaler != -1)
> + return -EINVAL;

Argh... This is actually wrong, as it leaves timer enabled.
I suggest simply dropping this patch and I'll rethink whole
approach a bit later (and better).

>   }
>   omap_dm_timer_write_reg(timer, OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_REG, l);
>  

Sorry for the noise,
ladis