Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-07 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:10:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Mark Rutland  wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> >> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
> >>
> >> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
> >>
> >> -Kees
> >
> > Something like the below?
> >
> > It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
> > right thing, anyhow:
> 
> Cool, this looks good. What happens on systems without an alias?

In that case, lm_alias() should be an identity function, and we'll just
hit the usual kernel address (i.e. it should be identical to
USERCOPY_KERNEL).

> Laura, feel free to add this to your series:
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook 

I'm happy with that, or I can resend this as a proper patch once the
rest is in.

Thanks,
Mark.


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-07 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:10:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Mark Rutland  wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> >> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
> >>
> >> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
> >>
> >> -Kees
> >
> > Something like the below?
> >
> > It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
> > right thing, anyhow:
> 
> Cool, this looks good. What happens on systems without an alias?

In that case, lm_alias() should be an identity function, and we'll just
hit the usual kernel address (i.e. it should be identical to
USERCOPY_KERNEL).

> Laura, feel free to add this to your series:
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook 

I'm happy with that, or I can resend this as a proper patch once the
rest is in.

Thanks,
Mark.


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Mark Rutland  wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
>> >
>> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
>> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
>>
>> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
>>
>> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
>>
>> -Kees
>
> Something like the below?
>
> It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
> right thing, anyhow:

Cool, this looks good. What happens on systems without an alias?

Laura, feel free to add this to your series:

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

-Kees

>
> root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# echo USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS > 
> /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
> [   44.493400] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from 
> 8031a730 () (4096 bytes)
> [   44.504263] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:75!
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> >8
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> index fdf954c..96d8d76 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> @@ -56,5 +56,6 @@
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void);
>
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> index f9154b8..f6bc6d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
> +   CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS),
>  };
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> index 1dd6114..955f2dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> @@ -279,9 +279,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void)
> do_usercopy_stack(true, false);
>  }
>
> -void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> +static void do_usercopy_kernel(bool use_alias)
>  {
> unsigned long user_addr;
> +   const void *rodata = test_text;
> +   void *text = vm_mmap;
> +
> +   if (use_alias) {
> +   rodata = lm_alias(rodata);
> +   text = lm_alias(text);
> +   }
>
> user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> @@ -292,14 +299,14 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> }
>
> pr_info("attempting good copy_to_user from kernel rodata\n");
> -   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, test_text,
> +   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, rodata,
>  unconst + sizeof(test_text))) {
> pr_warn("copy_to_user failed unexpectedly?!\n");
> goto free_user;
> }
>
> pr_info("attempting bad copy_to_user from kernel text\n");
> -   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, vm_mmap,
> +   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, text,
>  unconst + PAGE_SIZE)) {
> pr_warn("copy_to_user failed, but lacked Oops\n");
> goto free_user;
> @@ -309,6 +316,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
>  }
>
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> +{
> +   do_usercopy_kernel(false);
> +}
> +
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void)
> +{
> +   do_usercopy_kernel(true);
> +}
> +
>  void __init lkdtm_usercopy_init(void)
>  {
> /* Prepare cache that lacks SLAB_USERCOPY flag. */



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Mark Rutland  wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
>> >
>> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
>> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
>>
>> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
>>
>> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
>>
>> -Kees
>
> Something like the below?
>
> It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
> right thing, anyhow:

Cool, this looks good. What happens on systems without an alias?

Laura, feel free to add this to your series:

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

-Kees

>
> root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# echo USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS > 
> /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
> [   44.493400] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from 
> 8031a730 () (4096 bytes)
> [   44.504263] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:75!
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> >8
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> index fdf954c..96d8d76 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> @@ -56,5 +56,6 @@
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
>  void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void);
>
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> index f9154b8..f6bc6d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
> +   CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS),
>  };
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> index 1dd6114..955f2dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
> @@ -279,9 +279,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void)
> do_usercopy_stack(true, false);
>  }
>
> -void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> +static void do_usercopy_kernel(bool use_alias)
>  {
> unsigned long user_addr;
> +   const void *rodata = test_text;
> +   void *text = vm_mmap;
> +
> +   if (use_alias) {
> +   rodata = lm_alias(rodata);
> +   text = lm_alias(text);
> +   }
>
> user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> @@ -292,14 +299,14 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> }
>
> pr_info("attempting good copy_to_user from kernel rodata\n");
> -   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, test_text,
> +   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, rodata,
>  unconst + sizeof(test_text))) {
> pr_warn("copy_to_user failed unexpectedly?!\n");
> goto free_user;
> }
>
> pr_info("attempting bad copy_to_user from kernel text\n");
> -   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, vm_mmap,
> +   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, text,
>  unconst + PAGE_SIZE)) {
> pr_warn("copy_to_user failed, but lacked Oops\n");
> goto free_user;
> @@ -309,6 +316,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
>  }
>
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
> +{
> +   do_usercopy_kernel(false);
> +}
> +
> +void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void)
> +{
> +   do_usercopy_kernel(true);
> +}
> +
>  void __init lkdtm_usercopy_init(void)
>  {
> /* Prepare cache that lacks SLAB_USERCOPY flag. */



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55:28AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> 
> The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 

I've given this a go on Juno, which boots happily. LKDTM triggers as
expected when copying from the kernel text and its alias.

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland 
Tested-by: Mark Rutland 

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
> Found when reviewing the kernel. Tested.
> ---
>  mm/usercopy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
> index 3c8da0a..8345299 100644
> --- a/mm/usercopy.c
> +++ b/mm/usercopy.c
> @@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ static inline const char 
> *check_kernel_text_object(const void *ptr,
>* __pa() is not just the reverse of __va(). This can be detected
>* and checked:
>*/
> - textlow_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(textlow));
> + textlow_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(textlow);
>   /* No different mapping: we're done. */
>   if (textlow_linear == textlow)
>   return NULL;
>  
>   /* Check the secondary mapping... */
> - texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(texthigh));
> + texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(texthigh);
>   if (overlaps(ptr, n, textlow_linear, texthigh_linear))
>   return "";
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55:28AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> 
> The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 

I've given this a go on Juno, which boots happily. LKDTM triggers as
expected when copying from the kernel text and its alias.

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland 
Tested-by: Mark Rutland 

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
> Found when reviewing the kernel. Tested.
> ---
>  mm/usercopy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
> index 3c8da0a..8345299 100644
> --- a/mm/usercopy.c
> +++ b/mm/usercopy.c
> @@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ static inline const char 
> *check_kernel_text_object(const void *ptr,
>* __pa() is not just the reverse of __va(). This can be detected
>* and checked:
>*/
> - textlow_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(textlow));
> + textlow_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(textlow);
>   /* No different mapping: we're done. */
>   if (textlow_linear == textlow)
>   return NULL;
>  
>   /* Check the secondary mapping... */
> - texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(texthigh));
> + texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(texthigh);
>   if (overlaps(ptr, n, textlow_linear, texthigh_linear))
>   return "";
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
> >
> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
> 
> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
> 
> -Kees

Something like the below?

It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
right thing, anyhow:

root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# echo USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS > 
/sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
[   44.493400] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from 
8031a730 () (4096 bytes)
[   44.504263] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:75!

Thanks,
Mark.

>8
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
index fdf954c..96d8d76 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
@@ -56,5 +56,6 @@
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
index f9154b8..f6bc6d6 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
+   CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS),
 };
 
 
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
index 1dd6114..955f2dc 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
@@ -279,9 +279,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void)
do_usercopy_stack(true, false);
 }
 
-void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
+static void do_usercopy_kernel(bool use_alias)
 {
unsigned long user_addr;
+   const void *rodata = test_text;
+   void *text = vm_mmap;
+
+   if (use_alias) {
+   rodata = lm_alias(rodata);
+   text = lm_alias(text);
+   }
 
user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
@@ -292,14 +299,14 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
}
 
pr_info("attempting good copy_to_user from kernel rodata\n");
-   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, test_text,
+   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, rodata,
 unconst + sizeof(test_text))) {
pr_warn("copy_to_user failed unexpectedly?!\n");
goto free_user;
}
 
pr_info("attempting bad copy_to_user from kernel text\n");
-   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, vm_mmap,
+   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, text,
 unconst + PAGE_SIZE)) {
pr_warn("copy_to_user failed, but lacked Oops\n");
goto free_user;
@@ -309,6 +316,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
+{
+   do_usercopy_kernel(false);
+}
+
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void)
+{
+   do_usercopy_kernel(true);
+}
+
 void __init lkdtm_usercopy_init(void)
 {
/* Prepare cache that lacks SLAB_USERCOPY flag. */


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-12-06 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
> >
> > The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> > aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook 
> 
> I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...
> 
> -Kees

Something like the below?

It uses lm_alias(), so it depends on Laura's patches. We seem to do the
right thing, anyhow:

root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# echo USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS > 
/sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
[   44.493400] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from 
8031a730 () (4096 bytes)
[   44.504263] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:75!

Thanks,
Mark.

>8
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
index fdf954c..96d8d76 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
@@ -56,5 +56,6 @@
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
 void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
index f9154b8..f6bc6d6 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
+   CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS),
 };
 
 
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
index 1dd6114..955f2dc 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
@@ -279,9 +279,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void)
do_usercopy_stack(true, false);
 }
 
-void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
+static void do_usercopy_kernel(bool use_alias)
 {
unsigned long user_addr;
+   const void *rodata = test_text;
+   void *text = vm_mmap;
+
+   if (use_alias) {
+   rodata = lm_alias(rodata);
+   text = lm_alias(text);
+   }
 
user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
@@ -292,14 +299,14 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
}
 
pr_info("attempting good copy_to_user from kernel rodata\n");
-   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, test_text,
+   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, rodata,
 unconst + sizeof(test_text))) {
pr_warn("copy_to_user failed unexpectedly?!\n");
goto free_user;
}
 
pr_info("attempting bad copy_to_user from kernel text\n");
-   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, vm_mmap,
+   if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, text,
 unconst + PAGE_SIZE)) {
pr_warn("copy_to_user failed, but lacked Oops\n");
goto free_user;
@@ -309,6 +316,16 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void)
+{
+   do_usercopy_kernel(false);
+}
+
+void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL_ALIAS(void)
+{
+   do_usercopy_kernel(true);
+}
+
 void __init lkdtm_usercopy_init(void)
 {
/* Prepare cache that lacks SLAB_USERCOPY flag. */


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-11-29 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
>
> The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...

-Kees

> ---
> Found when reviewing the kernel. Tested.
> ---
>  mm/usercopy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
> index 3c8da0a..8345299 100644
> --- a/mm/usercopy.c
> +++ b/mm/usercopy.c
> @@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ static inline const char 
> *check_kernel_text_object(const void *ptr,
>  * __pa() is not just the reverse of __va(). This can be detected
>  * and checked:
>  */
> -   textlow_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(textlow));
> +   textlow_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(textlow);
> /* No different mapping: we're done. */
> if (textlow_linear == textlow)
> return NULL;
>
> /* Check the secondary mapping... */
> -   texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(texthigh));
> +   texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(texthigh);
> if (overlaps(ptr, n, textlow_linear, texthigh_linear))
> return "";
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security


Re: [PATCHv4 09/10] mm/usercopy: Switch to using lm_alias

2016-11-29 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Laura Abbott  wrote:
>
> The usercopy checking code currently calls __va(__pa(...)) to check for
> aliases on symbols. Switch to using lm_alias instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

I should probably add a corresponding alias test to lkdtm...

-Kees

> ---
> Found when reviewing the kernel. Tested.
> ---
>  mm/usercopy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
> index 3c8da0a..8345299 100644
> --- a/mm/usercopy.c
> +++ b/mm/usercopy.c
> @@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ static inline const char 
> *check_kernel_text_object(const void *ptr,
>  * __pa() is not just the reverse of __va(). This can be detected
>  * and checked:
>  */
> -   textlow_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(textlow));
> +   textlow_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(textlow);
> /* No different mapping: we're done. */
> if (textlow_linear == textlow)
> return NULL;
>
> /* Check the secondary mapping... */
> -   texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(texthigh));
> +   texthigh_linear = (unsigned long)lm_alias(texthigh);
> if (overlaps(ptr, n, textlow_linear, texthigh_linear))
> return "";
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security