Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-08 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Lee,

On 05/05/2015 12:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".
>> > 
>> > What is this in reference to?
>> >
>> 
>> I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
>> referring to this patch particular.
> 
> Better to quote one of the offending occurrences than to randomly
> top-post helpful comments.
> 

Just for clarification, on a second read I noticed that Gwendal was talking
about the subject line since $subject uses "mfd: cros ec" as a prefix while
most of the commits in the subsystem (and in the series) use "mfd: cros_ec".
Also, there is another patch (5/8) that used "mfd: cros-ec" so he is right
that I should had used cros_ec consistently.

Sorry for missing that and I will fix when posting v2.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-08 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Lee,

On 05/05/2015 12:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
 On Tue, 05 May 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
 On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
  On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
  
  Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of cros ec or cros-ec.
  
  What is this in reference to?
 
 
 I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
 referring to this patch particular.
 
 Better to quote one of the offending occurrences than to randomly
 top-post helpful comments.
 

Just for clarification, on a second read I noticed that Gwendal was talking
about the subject line since $subject uses mfd: cros ec as a prefix while
most of the commits in the subsystem (and in the series) use mfd: cros_ec.
Also, there is another patch (5/8) that used mfd: cros-ec so he is right
that I should had used cros_ec consistently.

Sorry for missing that and I will fix when posting v2.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> > 
> >> Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".
> > 
> > What is this in reference to?
> >
> 
> I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
> referring to this patch particular.

Better to quote one of the offending occurrences than to randomly
top-post helpful comments.

> >> Otherwise:
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> >> Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> >>  wrote:
> >> > From: Gwendal Grignou 
> >> >
> >> > parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
> >> > parent is unused, removed.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> >> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber 
> >> > Tested-by: Stephen Barber 
> >> > Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
> >> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
> >> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
> >> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
> >> >  4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > For when you re-submit:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones 
> > 
> 
> Thanks a lot for your ack.
> 
> Best regards,
> Javier

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-05 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Lee,

On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> 
>> Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".
> 
> What is this in reference to?
>

I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
referring to this patch particular.
 
>> Otherwise:
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou 
>> Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>  wrote:
>> > From: Gwendal Grignou 
>> >
>> > parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
>> > parent is unused, removed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou 
>> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber 
>> > Tested-by: Stephen Barber 
>> > Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat 
>> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
>> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
>> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
>> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
>> >  4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> For when you re-submit:
> 
> Acked-by: Lee Jones 
> 

Thanks a lot for your ack.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-05 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Lee,

On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
 On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
 
 Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of cros ec or cros-ec.
 
 What is this in reference to?


I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
referring to this patch particular.
 
 Otherwise:
 
 Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 
 On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
 javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
  From: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 
  parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
  parent is unused, removed.
 
  Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
  Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
  Tested-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
  Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat put...@chromium.org
  Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
  ---
   drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
   drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
   drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
   include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
   4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
 
 For when you re-submit:
 
 Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
 

Thanks a lot for your ack.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-05-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
 On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
  On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
  
  Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of cros ec or cros-ec.
  
  What is this in reference to?
 
 
 I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
 referring to this patch particular.

Better to quote one of the offending occurrences than to randomly
top-post helpful comments.

  Otherwise:
  
  Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
  Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
  
  On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
  javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
   From: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
  
   parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
   parent is unused, removed.
  
   Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
   Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
   Tested-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
   Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat put...@chromium.org
   Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
   ---
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
  
  For when you re-submit:
  
  Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
  
 
 Thanks a lot for your ack.
 
 Best regards,
 Javier

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:

> Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".

What is this in reference to?

> Otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>  wrote:
> > From: Gwendal Grignou 
> >
> > parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
> > parent is unused, removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber 
> > Tested-by: Stephen Barber 
> > Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat 
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
> >  4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

For when you re-submit:

Acked-by: Lee Jones 

> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> > index c0c30f4f946f..82b4d6148698 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> > @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int cros_ec_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c;
> > ec_dev->ec_name = client->name;
> > ec_dev->phys_name = client->adapter->name;
> > -   ec_dev->parent = >dev;
> >
> > err = cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
> > if (err) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> > index bf6e08e8013e..27bd52e5e8b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> > @@ -363,7 +363,6 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi;
> > ec_dev->ec_name = ec_spi->spi->modalias;
> > ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(_spi->spi->dev);
> > -   ec_dev->parent = _spi->spi->dev;
> > ec_dev->din_size = EC_MSG_BYTES + EC_MSG_PREAMBLE_COUNT;
> > ec_dev->dout_size = EC_MSG_BYTES;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c 
> > b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> > index 8f9ac4d7bbd0..860310513cf0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> > @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static int cros_ec_lpc_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> > ec_dev->dev = dev;
> > ec_dev->ec_name = pdev->name;
> > ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(dev);
> > -   ec_dev->parent = dev;
> > ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_lpc;
> > ec_dev->cmd_readmem = cros_ec_lpc_readmem;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> > index 324a34683971..14cf522123dd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
> >   * to using dword.
> >   * @din_size: size of din buffer to allocate (zero to use static din)
> >   * @dout_size: size of dout buffer to allocate (zero to use static dout)
> > - * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device)
> >   * @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep
> >   * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
> >   * Returns the number of bytes received if the communication 
> > succeeded, but
> > @@ -113,7 +112,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
> > uint8_t *dout;
> > int din_size;
> > int dout_size;
> > -   struct device *parent;
> > bool wake_enabled;
> > int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
> > struct cros_ec_command *msg);
> >

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:

 Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of cros ec or cros-ec.

What is this in reference to?

 Otherwise:
 
 Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 
 On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
 javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
  From: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 
  parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
  parent is unused, removed.
 
  Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
  Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
  Tested-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
  Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat put...@chromium.org
  Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
  ---
   drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
   drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
   drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
   include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
   4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

For when you re-submit:

Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org

  diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
  index c0c30f4f946f..82b4d6148698 100644
  --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
  +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
  @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int cros_ec_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
  ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c;
  ec_dev-ec_name = client-name;
  ec_dev-phys_name = client-adapter-name;
  -   ec_dev-parent = client-dev;
 
  err = cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
  if (err) {
  diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
  index bf6e08e8013e..27bd52e5e8b7 100644
  --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
  +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
  @@ -363,7 +363,6 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
  ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi;
  ec_dev-ec_name = ec_spi-spi-modalias;
  ec_dev-phys_name = dev_name(ec_spi-spi-dev);
  -   ec_dev-parent = ec_spi-spi-dev;
  ec_dev-din_size = EC_MSG_BYTES + EC_MSG_PREAMBLE_COUNT;
  ec_dev-dout_size = EC_MSG_BYTES;
 
  diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c 
  b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
  index 8f9ac4d7bbd0..860310513cf0 100644
  --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
  +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
  @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static int cros_ec_lpc_probe(struct platform_device 
  *pdev)
  ec_dev-dev = dev;
  ec_dev-ec_name = pdev-name;
  ec_dev-phys_name = dev_name(dev);
  -   ec_dev-parent = dev;
  ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_lpc;
  ec_dev-cmd_readmem = cros_ec_lpc_readmem;
 
  diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
  index 324a34683971..14cf522123dd 100644
  --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
  +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
  @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
* to using dword.
* @din_size: size of din buffer to allocate (zero to use static din)
* @dout_size: size of dout buffer to allocate (zero to use static dout)
  - * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device)
* @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep
* @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
* Returns the number of bytes received if the communication 
  succeeded, but
  @@ -113,7 +112,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
  uint8_t *dout;
  int din_size;
  int dout_size;
  -   struct device *parent;
  bool wake_enabled;
  int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
  struct cros_ec_command *msg);
 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-04-23 Thread Gwendal Grignou
Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".
Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou 
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou 

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
 wrote:
> From: Gwendal Grignou 
>
> parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
> parent is unused, removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber 
> Tested-by: Stephen Barber 
> Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
>  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
>  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
>  4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> index c0c30f4f946f..82b4d6148698 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int cros_ec_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c;
> ec_dev->ec_name = client->name;
> ec_dev->phys_name = client->adapter->name;
> -   ec_dev->parent = >dev;
>
> err = cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
> if (err) {
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> index bf6e08e8013e..27bd52e5e8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,6 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi;
> ec_dev->ec_name = ec_spi->spi->modalias;
> ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(_spi->spi->dev);
> -   ec_dev->parent = _spi->spi->dev;
> ec_dev->din_size = EC_MSG_BYTES + EC_MSG_PREAMBLE_COUNT;
> ec_dev->dout_size = EC_MSG_BYTES;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c 
> b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> index 8f9ac4d7bbd0..860310513cf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static int cros_ec_lpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ec_dev->dev = dev;
> ec_dev->ec_name = pdev->name;
> ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(dev);
> -   ec_dev->parent = dev;
> ec_dev->cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_lpc;
> ec_dev->cmd_readmem = cros_ec_lpc_readmem;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> index 324a34683971..14cf522123dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
>   * to using dword.
>   * @din_size: size of din buffer to allocate (zero to use static din)
>   * @dout_size: size of dout buffer to allocate (zero to use static dout)
> - * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device)
>   * @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep
>   * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
>   * Returns the number of bytes received if the communication succeeded, 
> but
> @@ -113,7 +112,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
> uint8_t *dout;
> int din_size;
> int dout_size;
> -   struct device *parent;
> bool wake_enabled;
> int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
> struct cros_ec_command *msg);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field

2015-04-23 Thread Gwendal Grignou
Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of cros ec or cros-ec.
Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
 From: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org

 parent and dev were pointing to the same device structure.
 parent is unused, removed.

 Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou gwen...@chromium.org
 Reviewed-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
 Tested-by: Stephen Barber smbar...@chromium.org
 Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat put...@chromium.org
 Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
 ---
  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h   | 2 --
  4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
 index c0c30f4f946f..82b4d6148698 100644
 --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
 +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
 @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int cros_ec_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c;
 ec_dev-ec_name = client-name;
 ec_dev-phys_name = client-adapter-name;
 -   ec_dev-parent = client-dev;

 err = cros_ec_register(ec_dev);
 if (err) {
 diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
 index bf6e08e8013e..27bd52e5e8b7 100644
 --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
 +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
 @@ -363,7 +363,6 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi;
 ec_dev-ec_name = ec_spi-spi-modalias;
 ec_dev-phys_name = dev_name(ec_spi-spi-dev);
 -   ec_dev-parent = ec_spi-spi-dev;
 ec_dev-din_size = EC_MSG_BYTES + EC_MSG_PREAMBLE_COUNT;
 ec_dev-dout_size = EC_MSG_BYTES;

 diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c 
 b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
 index 8f9ac4d7bbd0..860310513cf0 100644
 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
 +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
 @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static int cros_ec_lpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 ec_dev-dev = dev;
 ec_dev-ec_name = pdev-name;
 ec_dev-phys_name = dev_name(dev);
 -   ec_dev-parent = dev;
 ec_dev-cmd_xfer = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_lpc;
 ec_dev-cmd_readmem = cros_ec_lpc_readmem;

 diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
 index 324a34683971..14cf522123dd 100644
 --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
 +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
 @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
   * to using dword.
   * @din_size: size of din buffer to allocate (zero to use static din)
   * @dout_size: size of dout buffer to allocate (zero to use static dout)
 - * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device)
   * @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep
   * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
   * Returns the number of bytes received if the communication succeeded, 
 but
 @@ -113,7 +112,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
 uint8_t *dout;
 int din_size;
 int dout_size;
 -   struct device *parent;
 bool wake_enabled;
 int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec,
 struct cros_ec_command *msg);
 --
 2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/