Re: [RFC PATCH] seqlock: add lockdep support
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > Hi, > > > > lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=137875860600648=2 > > > > This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock. > > Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments and help. > > > > TODO: > > - fix seqlock usage in vdso code > > > > I got below with this patch applied. > > There should be something wrong with this patch. > > Any idea? > > You're aware of John Stultz's patches? No. Glad that John has wrote this. Reading it ... Thanks for the info. > > lkml.kernel.org/r/1379117948-7385-1-git-send-email-john.stu...@linaro.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH] seqlock: add lockdep support
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > Hi, > > lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=137875860600648=2 > > This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock. > Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments and help. > > TODO: > - fix seqlock usage in vdso code > > I got below with this patch applied. > There should be something wrong with this patch. > Any idea? You're aware of John Stultz's patches? lkml.kernel.org/r/1379117948-7385-1-git-send-email-john.stu...@linaro.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH] seqlock: add lockdep support
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: Hi, lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=137875860600648w=2 This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock. Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments and help. TODO: - fix seqlock usage in vdso code I got below with this patch applied. There should be something wrong with this patch. Any idea? You're aware of John Stultz's patches? lkml.kernel.org/r/1379117948-7385-1-git-send-email-john.stu...@linaro.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH] seqlock: add lockdep support
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: Hi, lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=137875860600648w=2 This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock. Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments and help. TODO: - fix seqlock usage in vdso code I got below with this patch applied. There should be something wrong with this patch. Any idea? You're aware of John Stultz's patches? No. Glad that John has wrote this. Reading it ... Thanks for the info. lkml.kernel.org/r/1379117948-7385-1-git-send-email-john.stu...@linaro.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
