Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread Wayne . Brown



The thing that confused me here was the help text in menuconfig.  The help for
CONFIG_I82365 says, "Say Y here to include support for PCMCIA and CardBus host
bridges that are register compatible with the Intel i82365 and/or the Yenta
specification: this includes virtually all modern PCMCIA bridges."  Also, the
help text for both this option and CONFIG_CARDBUS say, "If unsure, say Y," so I
selected both of them.  It wasn't until Jeff Garzik set me straight recently
that I began disabling CONFIG_I82365 and using CONFIG_CARDBUS alone.

Wayne




David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/07/2001 03:58:00 AM

To:   "Martin.Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:   Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc:
      Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec)

Subject:  Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to
  2.4.4




[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>   I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
> i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
> Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
> hint should go into the changes document.

i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be
'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent
confusion.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread Martin.Knoblauch

David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> >   I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
> > i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
> > Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
> > hint should go into the changes document.
> 
> i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be
> 'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent
> confusion.
> 

 good idea. maybe the token "bridge" should appear in both the Cardbus
and PCMCIA case. It *may* have brought me on track a bit earlier :-)

 It was also confusing, that the i82365 module worked [for me]
until/including 2.4.3-ac9.

 Anyway, the story just shows that reading the docs helps from time to
time. :-)

Martin
-- 
--
Martin Knoblauch |email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TeraPort GmbH|Phone:  +49-89-510857-309
IT Services  |Fax:+49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de   |Mobile: +49-170-4904759

begin:vcard 
n:Knoblauch;Martin
tel;cell:+49-170-4904759
tel;fax:+49-89-510857-111
tel;work:+49-89-510857-309
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.teraport.de
org:TeraPort GmbH;IT-Services
adr:;;Garmischer Straße 4;München;Bayern;D-80339;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior System Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;32160
fn:Martin Knoblauch
end:vcard



Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread David Woodhouse


[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 
>   I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
> i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
> Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
> hint should go into the changes document. 

i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be 
'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent 
confusion.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread David Woodhouse


[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
   I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
 i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
 Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
 hint should go into the changes document. 

i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be 
'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent 
confusion.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread Martin.Knoblauch

David Woodhouse wrote:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
  i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
  Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
  hint should go into the changes document.
 
 i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be
 'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent
 confusion.
 

 good idea. maybe the token bridge should appear in both the Cardbus
and PCMCIA case. It *may* have brought me on track a bit earlier :-)

 It was also confusing, that the i82365 module worked [for me]
until/including 2.4.3-ac9.

 Anyway, the story just shows that reading the docs helps from time to
time. :-)

Martin
-- 
--
Martin Knoblauch |email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TeraPort GmbH|Phone:  +49-89-510857-309
IT Services  |Fax:+49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de   |Mobile: +49-170-4904759

begin:vcard 
n:Knoblauch;Martin
tel;cell:+49-170-4904759
tel;fax:+49-89-510857-111
tel;work:+49-89-510857-309
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.teraport.de
org:TeraPort GmbH;IT-Services
adr:;;Garmischer Straße 4;München;Bayern;D-80339;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior System Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;32160
fn:Martin Knoblauch
end:vcard



Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4

2001-05-07 Thread Wayne . Brown



The thing that confused me here was the help text in menuconfig.  The help for
CONFIG_I82365 says, Say Y here to include support for PCMCIA and CardBus host
bridges that are register compatible with the Intel i82365 and/or the Yenta
specification: this includes virtually all modern PCMCIA bridges.  Also, the
help text for both this option and CONFIG_CARDBUS say, If unsure, say Y, so I
selected both of them.  It wasn't until Jeff Garzik set me straight recently
that I began disabling CONFIG_I82365 and using CONFIG_CARDBUS alone.

Wayne




David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/07/2001 03:58:00 AM

To:   Martin.Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc:
  Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec)

Subject:  Re: [Solved ?] Re: pcmcia problems after upgrading from 2.4.3-ac7 to
  2.4.4




[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

   I am not sure whether this should be closed alltogether. Maybe
 i82365 was not the proper choice for my hardware in the first place.
 Anyway, the module seems to be retired as of 2.4.3-ac10/ac11. Maybe a
 hint should go into the changes document.

i82365 is for use only on PCMCIA bridges, not CardBus. It should not be
'retired' but should probably have the config option renamed to prevent
confusion.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/