Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:13:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? > > I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry. > > However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please > send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it? Ok, I will. You are always in copy for kevent patchsets. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:59:17AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of > > features. > > No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since > regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build. I think if you would provide error message you saw, I fixed that in a couple of moments, doesn't it? I will send new patchset next week when rc1 will be out and your feedback is greatly appreciated. > -- > ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ > -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry. However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of > features. No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:23:36PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL > PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Generic event handling mechanism. > > > > Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications. > > It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to > > poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and > > allows to work with essentially eny kind of events. > > > > Events are provided into kernel through control syscall and can be read > > back through ring buffer or using usual syscalls. > > Kevent update (i.e. readiness switching) happens directly from internals > > of the appropriate state machine of the underlying subsytem (like > > network, filesystem, timer or any other). > > > > Homepage: > > http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects=kevent > > > > Documentation page: > > http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Kevent > > > > Consider for inclusion. > > > > P.S. If you want to be removed from Cc: list just drop me a mail. > > > > Changes from 'take34' patchset: > > * Ported to the 2.6.20-rc7 (9be5b038b1c9d1927c367bf91683458e10d5d4eb) tree. > > Is there some progress? > Some things to be implemented, described or discussed? I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of features. Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:23:36PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Generic event handling mechanism. Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications. It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and allows to work with essentially eny kind of events. Events are provided into kernel through control syscall and can be read back through ring buffer or using usual syscalls. Kevent update (i.e. readiness switching) happens directly from internals of the appropriate state machine of the underlying subsytem (like network, filesystem, timer or any other). Homepage: http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projectsitem=kevent Documentation page: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Kevent Consider for inclusion. P.S. If you want to be removed from Cc: list just drop me a mail. Changes from 'take34' patchset: * Ported to the 2.6.20-rc7 (9be5b038b1c9d1927c367bf91683458e10d5d4eb) tree. Is there some progress? Some things to be implemented, described or discussed? I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of features. Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of features. No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry. However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:59:17AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of features. No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build. I think if you would provide error message you saw, I fixed that in a couple of moments, doesn't it? I will send new patchset next week when rc1 will be out and your feedback is greatly appreciated. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:13:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry. However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it? Ok, I will. You are always in copy for kevent patchsets. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Generic event handling mechanism. The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error: CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_poll.o make[2]: *** No rule to make target `kernel/kevent/epoll.o', needed by `kernel/kevent/built-in.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [kernel/kevent] Error 2 make: *** [kernel] Error 2 - DML - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:28:05AM -0600, David M. Lloyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Generic event handling mechanism. > > The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error: > > CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o > CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o > CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o > CC kernel/kevent/kevent_poll.o > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `kernel/kevent/epoll.o', needed by > `kernel/kevent/built-in.o'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [kernel/kevent] Error 2 > make: *** [kernel] Error 2 It looks like I generated wrong diff from my tree - it compiles just fine. This patch should fix it. That hunk is about epoll rewrite over keent I posted couple of weeks ago. Thanks for testing. > - DML diff --git a/kernel/kevent/Makefile b/kernel/kevent/Makefile index a179bea..dc7f8b2 100644 --- a/kernel/kevent/Makefile +++ b/kernel/kevent/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ obj-y := kevent.o kevent_user.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_TIMER) += kevent_timer.o -obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_POLL) += kevent_poll.o epoll.o +obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_POLL) += kevent_poll.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_SOCKET) += kevent_socket.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_PIPE) += kevent_pipe.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_SIGNAL) += kevent_signal.o -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Generic event handling mechanism. > > Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications. > It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to > poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and > allows to work with essentially eny kind of events. > > Events are provided into kernel through control syscall and can be read > back through ring buffer or using usual syscalls. > Kevent update (i.e. readiness switching) happens directly from internals > of the appropriate state machine of the underlying subsytem (like > network, filesystem, timer or any other). > > Homepage: > http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects=kevent > > Documentation page: > http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Kevent > > Consider for inclusion. > > P.S. If you want to be removed from Cc: list just drop me a mail. > > Changes from 'take34' patchset: > * Ported to the 2.6.20-rc7 (9be5b038b1c9d1927c367bf91683458e10d5d4eb) tree. Is there some progress? Some things to be implemented, described or discussed? Thank you. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Generic event handling mechanism. Kevent is a generic subsytem which allows to handle event notifications. It supports both level and edge triggered events. It is similar to poll/epoll in some cases, but it is more scalable, it is faster and allows to work with essentially eny kind of events. Events are provided into kernel through control syscall and can be read back through ring buffer or using usual syscalls. Kevent update (i.e. readiness switching) happens directly from internals of the appropriate state machine of the underlying subsytem (like network, filesystem, timer or any other). Homepage: http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projectsitem=kevent Documentation page: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Kevent Consider for inclusion. P.S. If you want to be removed from Cc: list just drop me a mail. Changes from 'take34' patchset: * Ported to the 2.6.20-rc7 (9be5b038b1c9d1927c367bf91683458e10d5d4eb) tree. Is there some progress? Some things to be implemented, described or discussed? Thank you. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:28:05AM -0600, David M. Lloyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: Generic event handling mechanism. The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error: CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_poll.o make[2]: *** No rule to make target `kernel/kevent/epoll.o', needed by `kernel/kevent/built-in.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [kernel/kevent] Error 2 make: *** [kernel] Error 2 It looks like I generated wrong diff from my tree - it compiles just fine. This patch should fix it. That hunk is about epoll rewrite over keent I posted couple of weeks ago. Thanks for testing. - DML diff --git a/kernel/kevent/Makefile b/kernel/kevent/Makefile index a179bea..dc7f8b2 100644 --- a/kernel/kevent/Makefile +++ b/kernel/kevent/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ obj-y := kevent.o kevent_user.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_TIMER) += kevent_timer.o -obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_POLL) += kevent_poll.o epoll.o +obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_POLL) += kevent_poll.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_SOCKET) += kevent_socket.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_PIPE) += kevent_pipe.o obj-$(CONFIG_KEVENT_SIGNAL) += kevent_signal.o -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:12 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: Generic event handling mechanism. The patch applied cleanly to 2.6.20 final, but I got a build error: CC kernel/kevent/kevent.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_user.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_timer.o CC kernel/kevent/kevent_poll.o make[2]: *** No rule to make target `kernel/kevent/epoll.o', needed by `kernel/kevent/built-in.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [kernel/kevent] Error 2 make: *** [kernel] Error 2 - DML - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
