Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation - Invites comments from Community Members

2005-01-16 Thread Werner Almesberger
Rik van Riel wrote:
> Only secrets can be trade secrets.

I think he's just trying to re-invent patents under a different
name. IMHO, this isn't necessarily an outright lunatic idea, but
I wouldn't be surprised if it received a friendlier reception if
contradictory naming could be avoided.

- Werner

-- 
  _
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
/_http://www.almesberger.net//
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation - Invites comments from Community Members

2005-01-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, christos gentsis wrote:
second: does this US law means that everything could be a "trade 
secret"? even something like the GUI? or a process bar? and in case that 
someone will register them what is going to happens?
Only secrets can be trade secrets.
As soon as somebody else figures it out and publishes it,
it's no longer a secret, and can no longer be a trade
secret.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/