Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
> Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug > that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of probably > Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final? I dont plan to. Now is not the time to do this. We also need to understand the issue in detail - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
Greetings! Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
Greetings! Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of probably Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final? I dont plan to. Now is not the time to do this. We also need to understand the issue in detail - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > 2.2.18pre16 > o Finally get the m68k tree merged(Andrew McPherson >and a cast of many) Ah. Very good. > o NFSv3 server patches merge (Dave Higgen) This is also good. 2.2.18 looks most promising of all 2.2 series kernels so far. No problems with 2.2.18pre15 at home currently; just reiserfs needs manual patching in headers since it interferes with additional patches. Not a 2.2.18pre problem, though. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
> P.S. I apologize if this driver is allready marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x > -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make > sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced. Its already marked experimental, no problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
> Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under > asm-i386? :-) Its called 'I can apply this last diff just a minute before release, it cant possibly go wrong'. Fixed in my tree Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
P.S. I apologize if this driver is allready marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced. Its already marked experimental, no problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: 2.2.18pre16 o Finally get the m68k tree merged(Andrew McPherson and a cast of many) Ah. Very good. o NFSv3 server patches merge (Dave Higgen) This is also good. 2.2.18 looks most promising of all 2.2 series kernels so far. No problems with 2.2.18pre15 at home currently; just reiserfs needs manual patching in headers since it interferes with additional patches. Not a 2.2.18pre problem, though. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:27:25AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > -=usb backport (no effect if you say no to usb) Alan -- As the USB Mass Storage driver maintainer, I'd like to ask you to mark the USB Mass Storage driver as EXPERIMENTAL for the 2.2.x kernel series. This is an unsupported, known buggy backport. It's prone to OOPSing and lockups. Unfortunatly, I don't have time to fix all of these problems -- the original design assumed the presence of the new SCSI error-handling code, and without that, workarounds will be difficult. Matt Dharm P.S. I apologize if this driver is allready marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced. -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Ye gods! I have feet??! -- Dust Puppy User Friendly, 12/4/1997 PGP signature
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under asm-i386? :-) I know this makes more work for you Alan, but all of these silly errors (bogus reject files left in the tree, mistakedly leaving vmlinux.lds autogenerated files in the tree, etc.) would have a minuscule chance of surviving if you made prex-->prex+1 diffs yourself and read them over carefully before each release. I have to make these myself to merge my tree at each pre-patch and this is how I find all sorts of errors like this one. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre16
Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under asm-i386? :-) I know this makes more work for you Alan, but all of these silly errors (bogus reject files left in the tree, mistakedly leaving vmlinux.lds autogenerated files in the tree, etc.) would have a minuscule chance of surviving if you made prex--prex+1 diffs yourself and read them over carefully before each release. I have to make these myself to merge my tree at each pre-patch and this is how I find all sorts of errors like this one. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
