Re: Possible tty VT1 disallocate regression
On 06/14/2013 05:35 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
Hi,
Ever since commit 421b40a6286e ("tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock
order"), the first VT does not clear when I log out. AFAIK, this means
that disallocation is not working? The problem only affects the first
VT, the others clear when logging out.
And if you revert that patch, does it all start working again?
thanks,
greg k-h
p.s. In the future, please cc: the people who handled the patch you are
asking about, otherwise stuff like this often gets missed in the noise
of lkml.
I've already been re-reviewing the VT indexing to see if or what I missed.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Possible tty VT1 disallocate regression
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ever since commit 421b40a6286e ("tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock
> order"), the first VT does not clear when I log out. AFAIK, this means
> that disallocation is not working? The problem only affects the first
> VT, the others clear when logging out.
And if you revert that patch, does it all start working again?
thanks,
greg k-h
p.s. In the future, please cc: the people who handled the patch you are
asking about, otherwise stuff like this often gets missed in the noise
of lkml.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Possible tty VT1 disallocate regression
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Ever since commit 421b40a6286e (tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock order), the first VT does not clear when I log out. AFAIK, this means that disallocation is not working? The problem only affects the first VT, the others clear when logging out. And if you revert that patch, does it all start working again? thanks, greg k-h p.s. In the future, please cc: the people who handled the patch you are asking about, otherwise stuff like this often gets missed in the noise of lkml. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Possible tty VT1 disallocate regression
On 06/14/2013 05:35 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Ever since commit 421b40a6286e (tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock order), the first VT does not clear when I log out. AFAIK, this means that disallocation is not working? The problem only affects the first VT, the others clear when logging out. And if you revert that patch, does it all start working again? thanks, greg k-h p.s. In the future, please cc: the people who handled the patch you are asking about, otherwise stuff like this often gets missed in the noise of lkml. I've already been re-reviewing the VT indexing to see if or what I missed. Thanks, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
