Re: Re[2]: ReiserFS 2.4.4/3.x.0k-pre2

2001-05-15 Thread Chris Mason



On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 02:24:36 PM +0400 Samium Gromoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   Hello,
>  I`m still experiencing file tail corruptions
>   on subj.
>  And more: after i had restored bblocked patrition
>   (by relying on drive`s ability to remap bblks on
>   write by wroting small modification of debugreiserfs
>   which zeroified all bblks), i had _runtime_ tail
>corruptions of the mc`s dir hotlist which i tried 
>to rewrite again and again.
>   i found, that "sync"ing after modifying helps to keep
>   file fine, so it does until now.

Hmmm, are you sure the disk is good now?

What kinds of things are you doing on the files where you see tail
corruptions?  Can you reliably reproduce the corruption?

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re[2]: ReiserFS 2.4.4/3.x.0k-pre2

2001-05-15 Thread Samium Gromoff

  Hello,
 I`m still experiencing file tail corruptions
  on subj.
 And more: after i had restored bblocked patrition
  (by relying on drive`s ability to remap bblks on
  write by wroting small modification of debugreiserfs
  which zeroified all bblks), i had _runtime_ tail
   corruptions of the mc`s dir hotlist which i tried 
   to rewrite again and again.
  i found, that "sync"ing after modifying helps to keep
  file fine, so it does until now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/