Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-03-05 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/5/21 12:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Christoph, since there's multiple commits with issues, mind resending
>> a fixed branch? Then I'll drop the one I pulled today.
> 
> I've fixed the commit id and dropped the patch without the author
> signoff, but your branch still has the current patches.

Killed it this morning, please resend it. Plan on shipping to Linus
today so we ensure we hit -rc2.

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-03-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Christoph, since there's multiple commits with issues, mind resending
> a fixed branch? Then I'll drop the one I pulled today.

I've fixed the commit id and dropped the patch without the author
signoff, but your branch still has the current patches.


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-03-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/4/21 4:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   284e4cdb0c0b ("nvme-hwmon: Return error code when registration fails")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: ec420cdcfab4 ("nvme/hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: ed7770f66286 ("nvme-hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation")

Christoph, since there's multiple commits with issues, mind resending
a fixed branch? Then I'll drop the one I pulled today.


-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  284e4cdb0c0b ("nvme-hwmon: Return error code when registration fails")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: ec420cdcfab4 ("nvme/hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation")

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: ed7770f66286 ("nvme-hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpdEP11JEmwp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-02-22 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni
On 2/22/21 13:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
>   179d16007236 ("block: remove superfluous param in blk_fill_rwbs()")
>
> Fixes tag
>
>   Fixes: 1b9a9ab78b0 ("blktrace: use op accessors")
>
> has these problem(s):
>
>   - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
> or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
>
> -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Yes, it was my fault it should be 1b9a9ab78b0a the last 'a' is missing.



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-02-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  179d16007236 ("block: remove superfluous param in blk_fill_rwbs()")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 1b9a9ab78b0 ("blktrace: use op accessors")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpGtWOQNxr6z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On 2/19/21 9:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   76676c992506 ("io_uring: fix io_rsrc_ref_quiesce races")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: 0ce4a72632317 ("io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling 
> io_run_task_work*")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: a4f2225d1cb2 ("io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling 
> io_run_task_work*")

Fixed it up, thanks Stephen.

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-02-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  76676c992506 ("io_uring: fix io_rsrc_ref_quiesce races")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 0ce4a72632317 ("io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling 
io_run_task_work*")

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: a4f2225d1cb2 ("io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling 
io_run_task_work*")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpOB8SLSghjl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-02-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  8a0c014cd205 ("floppy: reintroduce O_NDELAY fix")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 09954bad4 ("floppy: refactor open() flags handling")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long

Fixes tag

  Fixes: f2791e7ead ("Revert "floppy: refactor open() flags handling"")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long

These can be fixed for future commits by setting core.abbrev to 12
(or more) or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set
(or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp1Izv4ouBAj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
injection")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
their I/O")

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
their I/O")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpiWwH2DILIf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 1/26/21 9:01 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 26-01-21 08:47:55, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/26/21 6:29 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Mon 25-01-21 11:39:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
 On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
>> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
>>  ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
>> injection")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
>> inject their I/O")
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>>  - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> Maybe you meant
>>
>> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
>> inject their I/O")
>>
>
> Hi Jens,
> how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
> Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?

 We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
 you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.
>>>
>>> FWIW I have a commit hook in my git tree that just refuses a commit with
>>> unknown Fixes tag SHA. Exactly to catch such mishaps in the patches I
>>> merge...
>>
>> That's not a bad idea, would help catch it upfront. Can you share the
>> hook?
> 
> Sure, attached. Note that the hook just gets commit ID from the Fixes tag
> and formats it with 12 commit ID digits and appropriate commit subject.

Thanks, that looks great, and also fixes up short shas.


-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 26-01-21 08:47:55, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/26/21 6:29 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 25-01-21 11:39:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
>  Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
>   ha scritto:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  In commit
> 
>   d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
>  injection")
> 
>  Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
>  inject their I/O")
> 
>  has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
>  Maybe you meant
> 
>  Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
>  inject their I/O")
> 
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>> how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
> >>> Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?
> >>
> >> We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
> >> you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.
> > 
> > FWIW I have a commit hook in my git tree that just refuses a commit with
> > unknown Fixes tag SHA. Exactly to catch such mishaps in the patches I
> > merge...
> 
> That's not a bad idea, would help catch it upfront. Can you share the
> hook?

Sure, attached. Note that the hook just gets commit ID from the Fixes tag
and formats it with 12 commit ID digits and appropriate commit subject.

Honza
-- 
Jan Kara 
SUSE Labs, CR
#!/bin/sh
#
# Called by "git commit" with one argument, the name of the file
# that has the commit message.  The hook should exit with non-zero
# status after issuing an appropriate message if it wants to stop the
# commit.  The hook is allowed to edit the commit message file.

# Process all Fixes tags, check commit IDs and set appropriate commit titles.

for COMMIT in $(sed -n -e 's/^Fixes: \([0-9a-z]*\).*/\1/p' "$1"); do
GOOD=$(git show -s --abbrev-commit --abbrev=12 --pretty=format:"%h 
(\"%s\")%n" $COMMIT -- 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$GOOD" ]; then
echo "Unknown commit: $COMMIT"
exit 1
fi
echo "Setting fixes tag: $GOOD"
sed -i -e "s/^Fixes: $COMMIT.*/Fixes: $GOOD/" "$1"
done

exit 0


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 1/26/21 6:29 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 25-01-21 11:39:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>>
>>>
 Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
  ha scritto:

 Hi all,

 In commit

  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
 injection")

 Fixes tag

  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
 inject their I/O")

 has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

 Maybe you meant

 Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
 their I/O")

>>>
>>> Hi Jens,
>>> how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
>>> Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?
>>
>> We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
>> you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.
> 
> FWIW I have a commit hook in my git tree that just refuses a commit with
> unknown Fixes tag SHA. Exactly to catch such mishaps in the patches I
> merge...

That's not a bad idea, would help catch it upfront. Can you share the
hook?

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-26 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 25-01-21 11:39:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
> >>  ha scritto:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> In commit
> >>
> >>  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
> >> injection")
> >>
> >> Fixes tag
> >>
> >>  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally 
> >> inject their I/O")
> >>
> >> has these problem(s):
> >>
> >>  - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >>
> >> Maybe you meant
> >>
> >> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
> >> their I/O")
> >>
> > 
> > Hi Jens,
> > how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
> > Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?
> 
> We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
> you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.

FWIW I have a commit hook in my git tree that just refuses a commit with
unknown Fixes tag SHA. Exactly to catch such mishaps in the patches I
merge...

Honza
-- 
Jan Kara 
SUSE Labs, CR


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On 1/25/21 11:35 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> 
>> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
>>  ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
>> injection")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
>> their I/O")
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>>  - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> Maybe you meant
>>
>> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
>> their I/O")
>>
> 
> Hi Jens,
> how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
> Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?

We just have to ignore it... But in the future, always double check that
you are using the right shas, not some sha from an internal tree.

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2021-01-25 Thread Paolo Valente



> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell 
>  ha scritto:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker 
> injection")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
> their I/O")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>  - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject 
> their I/O")
> 

Hi Jens,
how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?

Thanks,
Paolo

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-17 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/17/20 1:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   358e7cbf87b4 ("s390/dasd: fix hanging device offline processing")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: 47825e05d93e ("s390/dasd: fix endless loop after read unit address 
> configuration")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: 41995342b40c ("s390/dasd: fix endless loop after read unit address 
> configuration")

Thanks, I fixed it up.

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  358e7cbf87b4 ("s390/dasd: fix hanging device offline processing")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 47825e05d93e ("s390/dasd: fix endless loop after read unit address 
configuration")

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: 41995342b40c ("s390/dasd: fix endless loop after read unit address 
configuration")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpxU29RTFZat.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-01 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/1/20 2:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:09:24 -0700 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>>
>> On 12/1/20 2:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> In commit
>>>
>>>   573cc9d095bc ("blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in 
>>> blkcg_fill_root_iostats")
>>>
>>> Fixes tag
>>>
>>>   Fixes: ef45fe470e1 ("blk-cgroup: show global disk stats in root cgroup 
>>> io.stat")
>>>
>>> has these problem(s):
>>>
>>>   - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
>>>
>>> For the future, this can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more)
>>> or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to
>>> "auto").  
>>
>> It's in Linus's tree, not in -next. The ship has sailed...
> 
> Ummm, 573cc9d095bc is only in your tree as far as I can see ...
> however, I don't really expect these short SHA1 issues to be fixed up
> (as that would require rebasing your tree), just that people will try
> not to do the same in the future.

Hmm yes, but that's because I botched something up. I'll take a look!

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens,

On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:09:24 -0700 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>
> On 12/1/20 2:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > In commit
> > 
> >   573cc9d095bc ("blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in 
> > blkcg_fill_root_iostats")
> > 
> > Fixes tag
> > 
> >   Fixes: ef45fe470e1 ("blk-cgroup: show global disk stats in root cgroup 
> > io.stat")
> > 
> > has these problem(s):
> > 
> >   - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> > 
> > For the future, this can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more)
> > or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to
> > "auto").  
> 
> It's in Linus's tree, not in -next. The ship has sailed...

Ummm, 573cc9d095bc is only in your tree as far as I can see ...
however, I don't really expect these short SHA1 issues to be fixed up
(as that would require rebasing your tree), just that people will try
not to do the same in the future.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpCi6ELhDtWx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-01 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/1/20 2:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   573cc9d095bc ("blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in blkcg_fill_root_iostats")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: ef45fe470e1 ("blk-cgroup: show global disk stats in root cgroup 
> io.stat")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> 
> For the future, this can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more)
> or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to
> "auto").

It's in Linus's tree, not in -next. The ship has sailed...

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  573cc9d095bc ("blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in blkcg_fill_root_iostats")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: ef45fe470e1 ("blk-cgroup: show global disk stats in root cgroup 
io.stat")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long

For the future, this can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more)
or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to
"auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpi_BuQgVufg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-11-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  107673613884 ("blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in blkcg_fill_root_iostats")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: ef45fe470e1 ("blk-cgroup: show global disk stats in root cgroup 
io.stat")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long

For the future, this can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more)
or (for git v2.11 or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to
"auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpb3wRdLsTWw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-09-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  10988d55ae96 ("md/raid10: Change the return type of raid10_handle_discard to 
int")

Fixes tag

  fixes: 8f694215ae4c (md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request)

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

Maybe you meant

Fixes: 828d14fd7a6c ("md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpVObKSGpULx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-07-30 Thread Jens Axboe
On 7/29/20 4:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [Just adding cc's]
> 
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:08:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>   64d452b3560b ("nvme-loop: set ctrl state connecting after init")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>   Fixes: aa63fa6776a7 ("nvme-fabrics: allow to queue requests for live 
>> queues")
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> I can't easily find what commit is meant :-(

Yeah, it's obviously garbage, the commit doesn't even exist, let alone the sha.

Chaitanya, where's this from??

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

[Just adding cc's]

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:08:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> In commit
> 
>   64d452b3560b ("nvme-loop: set ctrl state connecting after init")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: aa63fa6776a7 ("nvme-fabrics: allow to queue requests for live 
> queues")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> I can't easily find what commit is meant :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpmp0DYRHa_I.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  64d452b3560b ("nvme-loop: set ctrl state connecting after init")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: aa63fa6776a7 ("nvme-fabrics: allow to queue requests for live queues")

has these problem(s):

  - Target SHA1 does not exist

I can't easily find what commit is meant :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpL2jUosDbJF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-29 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/29/20 4:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:25:01 -0600 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>>
>> On 6/29/20 10:21 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 29/06/2020 01:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
 Hi all,

 In commit

   8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")

 Fixes tag

   Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred 
 completions")  
>>>
>>> Jens, could you please fix this up after me?
>>> full hash: a1d7c393c4711a9ce6c239c3ab053a50dc96505a  
>>
>> I don't think that's a grave enough concern to rebase, it's just "missing" a
>> single digit of the sha.
> 
> Yeah, its more of a "please fix your git config". :-)

Agree! But I'm guessing that Pavel did this manually, which I end up
doing a lot too... And then mistakes happen.

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:25:01 -0600 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>
> On 6/29/20 10:21 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > On 29/06/2020 01:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> In commit
> >>
> >>   8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")
> >>
> >> Fixes tag
> >>
> >>   Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred 
> >> completions")  
> > 
> > Jens, could you please fix this up after me?
> > full hash: a1d7c393c4711a9ce6c239c3ab053a50dc96505a  
> 
> I don't think that's a grave enough concern to rebase, it's just "missing" a
> single digit of the sha.

Yeah, its more of a "please fix your git config". :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpcDQMqK6Acz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-29 Thread Pavel Begunkov
On 29/06/2020 01:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred 
> completions")

Jens, could you please fix this up after me?
full hash: a1d7c393c4711a9ce6c239c3ab053a50dc96505a

> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
> or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-29 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/29/20 10:21 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 29/06/2020 01:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>   8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>   Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred 
>> completions")
> 
> Jens, could you please fix this up after me?
> full hash: a1d7c393c4711a9ce6c239c3ab053a50dc96505a

I don't think that's a grave enough concern to rebase, it's just "missing" a
single digit of the sha.

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred completions")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp63DiZ4Us8z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-28 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/26/20 11:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:25:31 -0600 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>>
>> Right, but that's what git format-patch does when the line is long.
> 
> I just tested, and "git format-patch" (for me) does *not* split those lines.

Huh, I could have sworn it's done that for me in the past, just like it
splits the Subject: line into multiple lines as well (that I just did
verify that it still does).

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-27 Thread Pavel Begunkov
On 27/06/2020 08:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:56:05 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev 
>  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
 Hi all,

 In commit

   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")

 Fixes tag

   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize

 has these problem(s):

   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes

 Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  
>>>
>>> Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
>>> I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
>>> output ends up being for the fixes line:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>> io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")
>>>
>>> Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
>>>
>>> even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
>>> do with the longer line?  
>>
>> Yeah, I'll try to see if there's something I can do here, but it's going 
>> to be largely guesswork. Here's the original email:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22111b29e298f5f606130fcf4307bda99dbec089.1593077359.git.asml.sile...@gmail.com/raw
>>
>> The Fixes: footer really does get split into two. It's not that hard to 
>> add logic just for the Fixes tag (since it conveniently follows a set 
>> pattern), but finding a universal fix for split footers will be more 
>> difficult.
>>
>> I'll see what I can do.
> 
> But (what am I missing?) the Fixes: tag has been split over 2 lines in
> the original message ... on lore and my copy.  There is nothing for b4
> to do here, the author needs to do this right.

Yes, it was split from the beginning. It's really a shame it can't handle
multi-line tags, but well, I'll keep that in mind.

Though, it's curious how

```
Fixes ("line1
line2")
```

became 
```
line2")

Fixes ("line1
```

And that's what the rest of the thread is about.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens,

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:25:31 -0600 Jens Axboe  wrote:
>
> Right, but that's what git format-patch does when the line is long.

I just tested, and "git format-patch" (for me) does *not* split those lines.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpMPaX2H1NdF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Konstantin,

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:56:05 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev 
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > In commit
> > > 
> > >   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")
> > > 
> > > Fixes tag
> > > 
> > >   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
> > > 
> > > has these problem(s):
> > > 
> > >   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
> > >   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> > > 
> > > Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  
> > 
> > Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
> > I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
> > output ends up being for the fixes line:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")
> > 
> > Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
> > 
> > even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
> > do with the longer line?  
> 
> Yeah, I'll try to see if there's something I can do here, but it's going 
> to be largely guesswork. Here's the original email:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22111b29e298f5f606130fcf4307bda99dbec089.1593077359.git.asml.sile...@gmail.com/raw
> 
> The Fixes: footer really does get split into two. It's not that hard to 
> add logic just for the Fixes tag (since it conveniently follows a set 
> pattern), but finding a universal fix for split footers will be more 
> difficult.
> 
> I'll see what I can do.

But (what am I missing?) the Fixes: tag has been split over 2 lines in
the original message ... on lore and my copy.  There is nothing for b4
to do here, the author needs to do this right.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgptkJwEvBQnn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/26/20 7:56 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In commit
>>>
>>>   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")
>>>
>>> Fixes tag
>>>
>>>   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
>>>
>>> has these problem(s):
>>>
>>>   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
>>>   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
>>>
>>> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.
>>
>> Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
>> I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
>> output ends up being for the fixes line:
>>
>> [snip]
>> io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")
>>
>> Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
>>
>> even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
>> do with the longer line?
> 
> Yeah, I'll try to see if there's something I can do here, but it's going 
> to be largely guesswork. Here's the original email:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22111b29e298f5f606130fcf4307bda99dbec089.1593077359.git.asml.sile...@gmail.com/raw
> 
> The Fixes: footer really does get split into two. It's not that hard to 
> add logic just for the Fixes tag (since it conveniently follows a set 
> pattern), but finding a universal fix for split footers will be more 
> difficult.

Right, but that's what git format-patch does when the line is long. Do
we have other tags where that's a concern? If not, then the fix should
be solid I think.

> I'll see what I can do.

Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe



Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > In commit
> > 
> >   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")
> > 
> > Fixes tag
> > 
> >   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
> > 
> > has these problem(s):
> > 
> >   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
> >   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> > 
> > Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.
> 
> Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
> I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
> output ends up being for the fixes line:
> 
> [snip]
> io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")
> 
> Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
> 
> even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
> do with the longer line?

Yeah, I'll try to see if there's something I can do here, but it's going 
to be largely guesswork. Here's the original email:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22111b29e298f5f606130fcf4307bda99dbec089.1593077359.git.asml.sile...@gmail.com/raw

The Fixes: footer really does get split into two. It's not that hard to 
add logic just for the Fixes tag (since it conveniently follows a set 
pattern), but finding a universal fix for split footers will be more 
difficult.

I'll see what I can do.

-K


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
>   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> 
> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.

Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
output ends up being for the fixes line:

[snip]
io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")

Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize

even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
do with the longer line?

CC Konstantin.

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-06-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize

has these problem(s):

  - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
  - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes

Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpA2IUxBdAJ6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2020-05-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  dc35ada4251f ("block: fix a warning when blkdev.h is included for 
!CONFIG_BLOCK builds")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 956d510ee78 ("block: add disk/bio-based accounting helpers")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp6GrxzxtYE0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-10-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Bart,

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:36:36 -0700 Bart Van Assche  wrote:
>
> On 10/7/19 1:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> >Fixes: e34cbd307477 ("blk-wbt: add general throttling mechanism"; v4.10).
> 
> The above fixes tag follows the recommended format except that it is 
> followed by a kernel version number. Is there a recommended format for 
> embedding the kernel version number in a Fixes: tag? I think that 
> information is useful. I haven't found any recommendations for how to do 
> that in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

I have not seen any recommended way to do that, but there is no
necessity to embed the version as it can easily be derived:

$ git describe --contains e34cbd307477
v4.10-rc1~153^2~94

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpczfFS_JUbd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-10-10 Thread Bart Van Assche

On 10/7/19 1:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

In commit

   1d200e9d6f63 ("block: Fix writeback throttling W=1 compiler warnings")

Fixes tag

   Fixes: e34cbd307477 ("blk-wbt: add general throttling mechanism"; v4.10).

has these problem(s):

   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
   - Subject does not match target commit subject
 Just use
git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'


Hi Stephen,

The above fixes tag follows the recommended format except that it is 
followed by a kernel version number. Is there a recommended format for 
embedding the kernel version number in a Fixes: tag? I think that 
information is useful. I haven't found any recommendations for how to do 
that in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.


Thanks,

Bart.




linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  1d200e9d6f63 ("block: Fix writeback throttling W=1 compiler warnings")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: e34cbd307477 ("blk-wbt: add general throttling mechanism"; v4.10).

has these problem(s):

  - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
  - Subject does not match target commit subject
Just use
git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpYE3UoOq0be.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-09-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  8776f3fa15a5 ("io_uring: fix wrong sequence setting logic")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: de0617e4671 ("io_uring: add support for marking commands as draining")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpm5PC70IbnW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-07-12 Thread Minwoo Im
On 19-07-11 16:03:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/11/19 3:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > In commit
> > 
> >8f3858763d33 ("nvme: fix NULL deref for fabrics options")
> > 
> > Fixes tag
> > 
> >Fixes: 958f2a0f8 ("nvme-tcp: set the STABLE_WRITES flag when data digests
> > 
> > has these problem(s):
> > 
> >- SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> >  Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
> >  or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
> >- Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
> >- Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> > 
> > Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also do not
> > include blank lines among the tags.

I'm sorry for noises here.  I will keep that in mind.

Thanks Stephen,

> 
> I should have caught that. Since it's top-of-tree and recent, I'll
> amend it.

Jens,  I will do it from the next time.  Thanks for ammend.


Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-07-11 Thread Jens Axboe
On 7/11/19 3:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>8f3858763d33 ("nvme: fix NULL deref for fabrics options")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>Fixes: 958f2a0f8 ("nvme-tcp: set the STABLE_WRITES flag when data digests
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>- SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
>  Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
>  or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
>- Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
>- Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> 
> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also do not
> include blank lines among the tags.

I should have caught that. Since it's top-of-tree and recent, I'll
amend it.

-- 
Jens Axboe



linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-07-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

In commit

  8f3858763d33 ("nvme: fix NULL deref for fabrics options")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 958f2a0f8 ("nvme-tcp: set the STABLE_WRITES flag when data digests

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
  - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
  - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes

Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also do not
include blank lines among the tags.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpvcz5_dAWD1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

2019-02-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens,

In commit

  8f4e80da764e ("block: bounce: make sure that bvec table is updated")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: 6dc4f100c ("block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over 
multi-page bvec")

has these problem(s):

  - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpJceDTchM6W.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature