Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:37:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> Commit
> 
>   5137d303659d ("net: flow_offload: Fix memory leak for indirect flow block")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Sorry, that is in the net tree (not net-next).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpWq1_dBee5o.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  5137d303659d ("net: flow_offload: Fix memory leak for indirect flow block")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpdWo5aLHtjU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Saeed Mahameed]

On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 08:31 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   0d2ffdc8d400 ("net/mlx5: Don't call timecounter cyc2time directly
> from 1PPS flow")
>   87f3495cbe8d ("net/mlx5: Release clock lock before scheduling a PPS
> work")
>   aac2df7f022e ("net/mlx5: Rename ptp clock info")
>   fb609b5112bd ("net/mlx5: Always use container_of to find mdev
> pointer from clock struct")
>   ec529b44abfe ("net/mlx5: remove erroneous fallthrough")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
> 

Sorry for the mix-up, i overwrote the old mlnx email address with the
new nvidia one but didn't consider the committer email :S.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commits

  0d2ffdc8d400 ("net/mlx5: Don't call timecounter cyc2time directly from 1PPS 
flow")
  87f3495cbe8d ("net/mlx5: Release clock lock before scheduling a PPS work")
  aac2df7f022e ("net/mlx5: Rename ptp clock info")
  fb609b5112bd ("net/mlx5: Always use container_of to find mdev pointer from 
clock struct")
  ec529b44abfe ("net/mlx5: remove erroneous fallthrough")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpqo3tFRSMaz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  0093870aa891 ("batman-adv: Migrate to linux/prandom.h")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpLCAWM2Sq7P.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  6c4e9bcfb489 ("net/mlx5: Delete extra dump stack that gives nothing")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpbtbU05hg6_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  1315971fea66 ("net/mlx5e: Fix missing switch_id for representors")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpjpTuMGtYOK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  07bab9502641 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Refactor eswitch ingress acl codes")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpTHwbH_eR74.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  be904b855200 ("sfc: make capability checking a nic_type function")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp4jUme3tRDf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Randy Dunlap]

On 10/2/19 3:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   0f04f8ea62ce ("Minor fixes to the CAIF Transport drivers Kconfig file")
>   21d549769e79 ("Isolate CAIF transport drivers into their own menu")
>   0903102f5785 ("Clean up the net/caif/Kconfig menu")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors.
> 
> I guess  and  may be the
> same person?  Please be consistent.

  Yes.  Yes, will do that.

-- 
~Randy

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commits

  0f04f8ea62ce ("Minor fixes to the CAIF Transport drivers Kconfig file")
  21d549769e79 ("Isolate CAIF transport drivers into their own menu")
  0903102f5785 ("Clean up the net/caif/Kconfig menu")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors.

I guess  and  may be the
same person?  Please be consistent.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpk5qlos1KUv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Oleksij Rempel]

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:41:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 
> [Not sure if I should complain about this one ...]

Here is the original pull request message for this patch series:
"The final patch is the collective effort of many entities (The j1939
authors: Oliver Hartkopp, Bastian Stender, Elenita Hinds, kbuild test
robot, Kurt Van Dijck, Maxime Jayat, Robin van der Gracht, Oleksij
Rempel, Marc Kleine-Budde). It adds support of SAE J1939 protocol to the
CAN networking stack."
https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg313476.html

Since the patch can be hardly assigned to one author we deiced to use
address of CAN mailing list.

Best regards,
Oleksij Rempel
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686   | Fax:   +49-5121-206917- |

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Luciano Coelho]

On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 00:42 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   aa43ae121675 ("iwlwifi: LTR updates")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Oops, that was my fault.  What can we do about it? Is it enough if I
give my s-o-b publicly here?

I hereby sign off this change:

Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho 


--
Cheers,
Luca.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  aa43ae121675 ("iwlwifi: LTR updates")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpMPkHMrX50z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

[Not sure if I should complain about this one ...]

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpu3pVOzLkqZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Yifeng Sun]

Hi Stephen,

Sure, thanks!
Yifeng

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:54 PM Stephen Rothwell  wrote:
>
> Hi Yifeng,
>
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:37:26 -0700 Yifeng Sun  wrote:
> >
> > My apologies, thanks for the email. Please add the signed-off if you can.
>
> Dave does not rebase his trees, so that is not possible.  Just remember
> for next time, thanks :-)
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Yifeng,

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:37:26 -0700 Yifeng Sun  wrote:
>
> My apologies, thanks for the email. Please add the signed-off if you can.

Dave does not rebase his trees, so that is not possible.  Just remember
for next time, thanks :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpsJqsY4ng0g.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Yifeng Sun]

Hi Stephen,

My apologies, thanks for the email. Please add the signed-off if you can.

Signed-off-by: Yifeng Sun 

Thanks,
Yifeng

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:30 PM Stephen Rothwell  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
>   aa733660dbd8 ("openvswitch: Print error when ovs_execute_actions() fails")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  aa733660dbd8 ("openvswitch: Print error when ovs_execute_actions() fails")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpfvIM92z2r0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  6e52fca36c67 ("tc-tests: Add tc action ct tests")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpzirs1HLpWZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Miller]

From: lepton 
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:27:45 -0800

> I sent another version with signed off serveral days ago:
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg543829.html
> 
> So for some reason it got missed?

I didn't see it before I applied the initial patch because I was
heavily backlogged, I saw it afterwards...

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Miller]

From: Stephen Rothwell 
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:06:19 +1100

> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   a22d3251423f ("Fix ERROR:do not initialise statics to 0 in af_vsock.c")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

I know, I caught it right after I pushed out, sorry :(

I really have to go back to working on that automation so this stops
happening.  My bad.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  a22d3251423f ("Fix ERROR:do not initialise statics to 0 in af_vsock.c")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgp8AvKEBACNp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  9cd00a8aa42e ("net: phy: phylink: Poll link GPIOs")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgprfBXsa8EOP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  9cd00a8aa42e ("net: phy: phylink: Poll link GPIOs")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgprfBXsa8EOP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  cbad52e92ad7 ("sfc: don't warn on successful change of MAC")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  cbad52e92ad7 ("sfc: don't warn on successful change of MAC")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Kirill Smelkov]

Francois,

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:55:24AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov  :
> [...]
> > I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> > first posting from ~ 1 month ago.
> 
> I thought it was longer than that. Sorry for the frustrating excess delay.
> 
> As Eric already said there is no problem and I am perfectly fine with
> the current attribution of this code.

Thanks for feedback.

> Use of errno.h::ELNRNG is really unusual but it's a different topic.

I wanted the error returned due to internal inconsistency to be different
from the error returned when there is error in provided parameters from
ethtool.

Your original patch was returning EINVAL for both cases which made it
hard to understand what is going on when the kernel was refusing to
accept something from user.

That's why I used ELNRNG (link number out of range) for situation when
lookup of timings vector by current link speed failed. A bit unusual,
yes, but this was the closest to the situation after studying `errno -l`
output.

Hope this clarifies a bit.

Please feel free to suggest a change here,
Kirill

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Kirill Smelkov]

Francois,

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:55:24AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov  :
> [...]
> > I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> > first posting from ~ 1 month ago.
> 
> I thought it was longer than that. Sorry for the frustrating excess delay.
> 
> As Eric already said there is no problem and I am perfectly fine with
> the current attribution of this code.

Thanks for feedback.

> Use of errno.h::ELNRNG is really unusual but it's a different topic.

I wanted the error returned due to internal inconsistency to be different
from the error returned when there is error in provided parameters from
ethtool.

Your original patch was returning EINVAL for both cases which made it
hard to understand what is going on when the kernel was refusing to
accept something from user.

That's why I used ELNRNG (link number out of range) for situation when
lookup of timings vector by current link speed failed. A bit unusual,
yes, but this was the closest to the situation after studying `errno -l`
output.

Hope this clarifies a bit.

Please feel free to suggest a change here,
Kirill

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Francois Romieu]

Kirill Smelkov  :
[...]
> I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

I thought it was longer than that. Sorry for the frustrating excess delay.

As Eric already said there is no problem and I am perfectly fine with
the current attribution of this code.

Use of errno.h::ELNRNG is really unusual but it's a different topic.

-- 
Ueimor

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Francois Romieu]

Kirill Smelkov  :
[...]
> I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

I thought it was longer than that. Sorry for the frustrating excess delay.

As Eric already said there is no problem and I am perfectly fine with
the current attribution of this code.

Use of errno.h::ELNRNG is really unusual but it's a different topic.

-- 
Ueimor

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Kirill Smelkov]

Francois,

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool 
> -C)")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).

Could we please get signoff for this your patch from 2012 which I've
reworked a bit to be commit 509708310cf9 ?

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg217984.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg218207.html

I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

Thanks beforehand,
Kirill

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Kirill Smelkov]

Francois,

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool 
> -C)")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).

Could we please get signoff for this your patch from 2012 which I've
reworked a bit to be commit 509708310cf9 ?

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg217984.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg218207.html

I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

Thanks beforehand,
Kirill

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Eric Dumazet]

On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 09:14 +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Francois,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool 
> > -C)")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).
> 
> Could we please get signoff for this your patch from 2012 which I've
> reworked a bit to be commit 509708310cf9 ?
> 
>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg217984.html
>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg218207.html
> 
> I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

Nothing we can do, patch is merged, we can not modify it anymore.

You provided all the rationale in the changelog, so no worries.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Eric Dumazet]

On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 09:14 +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Francois,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool 
> > -C)")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).
> 
> Could we please get signoff for this your patch from 2012 which I've
> reworked a bit to be commit 509708310cf9 ?
> 
>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg217984.html
>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg218207.html
> 
> I was keeping you in To and Cc all the time but got no reply at all since my
> first posting from ~ 1 month ago.

Nothing we can do, patch is merged, we can not modify it anymore.

You provided all the rationale in the changelog, so no worries.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool -C)")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  509708310cf9 ("r8169: Add support for interrupt coalesce tuning (ethtool -C)")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author (or its author is wrong).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  8f1975e31d8e ("inetpeer: speed up inetpeer_invalidate_tree()")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  8f1975e31d8e ("inetpeer: speed up inetpeer_invalidate_tree()")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Miller]

From: David Ahern 
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:53:48 -0600

> On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Commit
>> 
>>   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
>> address")
>> 
>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>> 
> 
> Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
> a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

Yes, it unfortunately got clipped off by GIT due to how the
commit message was written. :(

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Miller]

From: David Ahern 
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:53:48 -0600

> On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Commit
>> 
>>   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
>> address")
>> 
>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>> 
> 
> Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
> a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

Yes, it unfortunately got clipped off by GIT due to how the
commit message was written. :(

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi David,

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:53:48 -0600 David Ahern  wrote:
>
> On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
> > address")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 
> Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
> a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

Rats!

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi David,

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:53:48 -0600 David Ahern  wrote:
>
> On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
> > address")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 
> Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
> a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

Rats!

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Ahern]

On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
> address")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 

Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[David Ahern]

On 8/30/17 10:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local 
> address")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 

Eric pointed this out last night. The commit message copied output from
a command that contained '---' so git ignored the remainder of the message.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local address")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Commit

  1b70d792cf67 ("ipv6: Use rt6i_idev index for echo replies to a local address")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell