Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [ BROKEN vfs-next: fs/pipe.c ]
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130408: > > The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > next-20130405. > With the attached patch including a follow-up I was able to boot today's Linux-Next. I have reverted "Revert "pipe: fold file_operations instances in one" from linux-next and applied the fixed correct one from vfs-next. - Sedat - 3.9.0-rc6-next20130409-2-iniza-small.patch Description: Binary data
Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [ BROKEN vfs-next: fs/pipe.c ]
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130408: The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20130405. With the attached patch including a follow-up I was able to boot today's Linux-Next. I have reverted Revert pipe: fold file_operations instances in one from linux-next and applied the fixed correct one from vfs-next. - Sedat - 3.9.0-rc6-next20130409-2-iniza-small.patch Description: Binary data
