Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-18 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:12:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
> locatioat91n")
> 
> from the at91 tree and commit:
> 
>   010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")
> 
> from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me.

greg k-h


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-18 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:12:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
> locatioat91n")
> 
> from the at91 tree and commit:
> 
>   010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")
> 
> from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me.

greg k-h


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-18 Thread Nicolas Ferre

On 18/09/2018 at 05:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:

   MAINTAINERS

between commit:

   5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
locatioat91n")

from the at91 tree and commit:

   010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.


Resolution looks good to me.

Thanks. Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-18 Thread Nicolas Ferre

On 18/09/2018 at 05:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:

   MAINTAINERS

between commit:

   5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
locatioat91n")

from the at91 tree and commit:

   010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.


Resolution looks good to me.

Thanks. Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre


linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:

  MAINTAINERS

between commit:

  5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
locatioat91n")

from the at91 tree and commit:

  010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc MAINTAINERS
index 0d01245ef7b4,7f77f2c837a8..
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@@ -9539,72 -9582,14 +9554,80 @@@ L:   net...@vger.kernel.or
  S:Maintained
  F:drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_*
  
 +MICROCHIP LCDFB DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Maintained
 +F:drivers/video/fbdev/atmel_lcdfb.c
 +F:include/video/atmel_lcdc.h
 +
+ MICROCHIP / ATMEL MCP3911 ADC DRIVER
+ M:Marcus Folkesson 
+ M:Kent Gustavsson 
+ L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
+ S:Supported
+ F:drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
+ F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/mcp3911.txt
+ 
 +MICROCHIP MMC/SD/SDIO MCI DRIVER
 +M:Ludovic Desroches 
 +S:Maintained
 +F:drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP NAND DRIVER
 +M:Tudor Ambarus 
 +L:linux-...@lists.infradead.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/*
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
 +
 +MICROCHIP PWM DRIVER
 +M:Claudiu Beznea 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-pwm.txt
 +
 +MICROCHIP SAMA5D2-COMPATIBLE ADC DRIVER
 +M:Ludovic Desroches 
 +M:Eugen Hristev 
 +L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt
 +F:include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.h
 +
 +MICROCHIP SAMA5D2-COMPATIBLE SHUTDOWN CONTROLLER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP SPI DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/spi/spi-atmel.*
 +
 +MICROCHIP SSC DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
 +F:include/linux/atmel-ssc.h
 +
 +MICROCHIP TIMER COUNTER (TC) AND CLOCKSOURCE DRIVERS
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c
 +F:drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP USBA UDC DRIVER
 +M:Cristian Birsan 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.*
 +
  MICROCHIP USB251XB DRIVER
  M:Richard Leitner 
  L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org


pgpXlDeFsxo7J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the at91 tree

2018-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:

  MAINTAINERS

between commit:

  5ae2f1f30197 ("MAINTAINERS: move former ATMEL entries to proper MICROCHIP 
locatioat91n")

from the at91 tree and commit:

  010de20412fc ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for mcp3911 ADC driver")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc MAINTAINERS
index 0d01245ef7b4,7f77f2c837a8..
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@@ -9539,72 -9582,14 +9554,80 @@@ L:   net...@vger.kernel.or
  S:Maintained
  F:drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_*
  
 +MICROCHIP LCDFB DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Maintained
 +F:drivers/video/fbdev/atmel_lcdfb.c
 +F:include/video/atmel_lcdc.h
 +
+ MICROCHIP / ATMEL MCP3911 ADC DRIVER
+ M:Marcus Folkesson 
+ M:Kent Gustavsson 
+ L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
+ S:Supported
+ F:drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
+ F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/mcp3911.txt
+ 
 +MICROCHIP MMC/SD/SDIO MCI DRIVER
 +M:Ludovic Desroches 
 +S:Maintained
 +F:drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP NAND DRIVER
 +M:Tudor Ambarus 
 +L:linux-...@lists.infradead.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/*
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
 +
 +MICROCHIP PWM DRIVER
 +M:Claudiu Beznea 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-pwm.txt
 +
 +MICROCHIP SAMA5D2-COMPATIBLE ADC DRIVER
 +M:Ludovic Desroches 
 +M:Eugen Hristev 
 +L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
 +F:Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt
 +F:include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.h
 +
 +MICROCHIP SAMA5D2-COMPATIBLE SHUTDOWN CONTROLLER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP SPI DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/spi/spi-atmel.*
 +
 +MICROCHIP SSC DRIVER
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
 +F:include/linux/atmel-ssc.h
 +
 +MICROCHIP TIMER COUNTER (TC) AND CLOCKSOURCE DRIVERS
 +M:Nicolas Ferre 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c
 +F:drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
 +
 +MICROCHIP USBA UDC DRIVER
 +M:Cristian Birsan 
 +L:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 +S:Supported
 +F:drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.*
 +
  MICROCHIP USB251XB DRIVER
  M:Richard Leitner 
  L:linux-...@vger.kernel.org


pgpXlDeFsxo7J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature