Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-24 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Stephen Rothwell  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c and
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c between commit 871760ce97a9
> ("pnfs/blocklayout: move all rpc_pipefs related code into a single
> file") from the nfs tree and commit f139caf2e897 ("sched, cleanup,
> treewide: Remove set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) after schedule()")
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former move the code in these two files into
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c, so I deleted the 2 files and applied
> the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell 
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:29:19 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: merge fixup for sched cleanup of 
> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell 
> ---
>  fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> index 8d04bda2bd2e..e966c023b1b7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ bl_resolve_deviceid(struct nfs_server *server, struct 
> pnfs_block_volume *b,
>  
>   set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>   schedule();
> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>   remove_wait_queue(>bl_wq, );
>  
>   if (reply->status != BL_DEVICE_REQUEST_PROC) {

Looks good, thanks Stephen!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-24 Thread Ingo Molnar

* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c and
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c between commit 871760ce97a9
 (pnfs/blocklayout: move all rpc_pipefs related code into a single
 file) from the nfs tree and commit f139caf2e897 (sched, cleanup,
 treewide: Remove set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) after schedule())
 from the tip tree.
 
 I fixed it up (the former move the code in these two files into
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c, so I deleted the 2 files and applied
 the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
 action is required).
 
 From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:29:19 +1000
 Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: merge fixup for sched cleanup of 
 set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)
 
 Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
 ---
  fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
 index 8d04bda2bd2e..e966c023b1b7 100644
 --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
 +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
 @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ bl_resolve_deviceid(struct nfs_server *server, struct 
 pnfs_block_volume *b,
  
   set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
   schedule();
 - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
   remove_wait_queue(nn-bl_wq, wq);
  
   if (reply-status != BL_DEVICE_REQUEST_PROC) {

Looks good, thanks Stephen!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Thanks Stephen,

the fixup looks obviously correct to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Thanks Stephen,

the fixup looks obviously correct to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c and
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c between commit 871760ce97a9
("pnfs/blocklayout: move all rpc_pipefs related code into a single
file") from the nfs tree and commit f139caf2e897 ("sched, cleanup,
treewide: Remove set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) after schedule()")
from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (the former move the code in these two files into
fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c, so I deleted the 2 files and applied
the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
action is required).

From: Stephen Rothwell 
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:29:19 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: merge fixup for sched cleanup of 
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell 
---
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
index 8d04bda2bd2e..e966c023b1b7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ bl_resolve_deviceid(struct nfs_server *server, struct 
pnfs_block_volume *b,
 
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
-   __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(>bl_wq, );
 
if (reply->status != BL_DEVICE_REQUEST_PROC) {
-- 
2.1.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c and
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c between commit 871760ce97a9
(pnfs/blocklayout: move all rpc_pipefs related code into a single
file) from the nfs tree and commit f139caf2e897 (sched, cleanup,
treewide: Remove set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) after schedule())
from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (the former move the code in these two files into
fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c, so I deleted the 2 files and applied
the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
action is required).

From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:29:19 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: merge fixup for sched cleanup of 
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
---
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
index 8d04bda2bd2e..e966c023b1b7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ bl_resolve_deviceid(struct nfs_server *server, struct 
pnfs_block_volume *b,
 
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
-   __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(nn-bl_wq, wq);
 
if (reply-status != BL_DEVICE_REQUEST_PROC) {
-- 
2.1.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-08-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
fs/nfs/pagelist.c between commit e7029206ff43 ("nfs: check
wait_on_bit_lock err in page_group_lock") from the nfs tree and commit
743162013d40 ("sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action
functions") from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/nfs/pagelist.c
index 9425118e91d7,0be5050638f7..
--- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
@@@ -158,14 -149,8 +152,13 @@@ nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *re
  
WARN_ON_ONCE(head != head->wb_head);
  
 -  wait_on_bit_lock(>wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
 +  do {
 +  ret = wait_on_bit_lock(>wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
-   nfs_wait_bit_uninterruptible,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 +  } while (wait && ret != 0);
 +
 +  WARN_ON_ONCE(ret > 0);
 +  return ret;
  }
  
  /*


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfs tree

2014-08-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
fs/nfs/pagelist.c between commit e7029206ff43 (nfs: check
wait_on_bit_lock err in page_group_lock) from the nfs tree and commit
743162013d40 (sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action
functions) from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/nfs/pagelist.c
index 9425118e91d7,0be5050638f7..
--- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
@@@ -158,14 -149,8 +152,13 @@@ nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *re
  
WARN_ON_ONCE(head != head-wb_head);
  
 -  wait_on_bit_lock(head-wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
 +  do {
 +  ret = wait_on_bit_lock(head-wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK,
-   nfs_wait_bit_uninterruptible,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 +  } while (wait  ret != 0);
 +
 +  WARN_ON_ONCE(ret  0);
 +  return ret;
  }
  
  /*


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature